您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 麻醉,静脉内

麻醉,静脉内

麻醉,静脉内的相关文献在1999年到2015年内共计118篇,主要集中在外科学、药学、妇产科学 等领域,其中期刊论文118篇、专利文献195485篇;相关期刊51种,包括医学临床研究、腹腔镜外科杂志、安徽医科大学学报等; 麻醉,静脉内的相关文献由366位作者贡献,包括吴新民、王世端、曾凯等。

麻醉,静脉内—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:118 占比:0.06%

专利文献>

论文:195485 占比:99.94%

总计:195603篇

麻醉,静脉内—发文趋势图

麻醉,静脉内

-研究学者

  • 吴新民
  • 王世端
  • 曾凯
  • 曾因明
  • 褚海辰
  • 许幸
  • 余聚生
  • 刘高望
  • 史永胜
  • 吴向南
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 朱姝颖
    • 摘要: Objective:To discuss the anesthesia effects of using sufentanil combined with propofol total intravenous anesthesia. Methods:Sixty patients with thoracic surgery were chosen and divided into two groups according to the random number method ( 30 cases in each group ):the control group was given the traditional intravenous anesthesia;the observation group was given sufentanil 0. 5~1. 5 μg· kg-1 · h-1 combined with propofol 3 ~5 mg · kg-1 · h-1 venous continuous pump and 0. 6 g · kg-1 · min-1 of atracurium was used to keep muscle relaxan. The anesthesia effects and complications of the two groups were recorded and compared. Results:Heart rate of the two groups was declined at T1 compared with T0,and results showed that heart rate of the control group was higher than that of the observation group(P<0. 01) from T2 to T5;systolic blood pressure(SBP) values of the control group were decreased at T1 compared with T0 while SBP values of the observation group were decreased at T3 compared with T0,and SBP values of the control group from T2 to T5 were higher than those of the observation group(P<0. 01);at T4 SpO2 values of the two group were higher than at T0,SpO2 values of and the control group were higher than that of the observation group(P<0. 01). In the control group the extubation time was(18. 3 ± 7. 8) min,significantly longer than that in the observation group(12. 8 ± 6. 9) min(P <0. 01);Postoperative adverse reaction rate of the control group was 30. 0% higher than that of the observation group 6. 7%(P <0. 05). Awakening period match rate in the observation group was 93. 3% higher than that in the control group 80. 0% (P <0. 05). Conclusions:Using sufentanil combined with propofol has better anesthesia effects,also with shorter postoperative awake time and low incidence of adverse reactions,which is worthy of clinical promotion.%目的::探讨舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于胸科手术的麻醉效果。方法:选取行胸科手术患者60例,按照随机数字法分为观察组和对照组各30例。对照组给予传统的静吸复合全身麻醉;观察组给予舒芬太尼0.5~1.5μg·kg-1·h-1联合丙泊酚3~5 mg·kg-1·h-1静脉持续泵注,肌松维持均为阿曲库铵0.6μg·kg-1·min-1静脉泵注;对比2组患者的麻醉效果及不良反应。结果:2组T1心率均较T0明显下降(P<0.01),且对照组的T2~T5的心率均显著高于观察组(P<0.01);对照组T1较T0的收缩压(SBP)值明显下降,观察组T3较T0的SBP值亦显著下降(P<0.01),对照组T2~T5的SBP值均明显高于观察组(P<0.01);2组T4 SpO2均较T0明显升高(P<0.01),对照组T3 SpO2值显著高于观察组(P<0.01)。对照组拔管时间为(18.3±7.8)min,明显长于观察组的(12.8±6.9)min(P<0.01);术后对照组总不良反应率30.0%,高于观察组的6.7%(P<0.05)。观察组苏醒期配合率为93.3%,高于对照组的80.0%(P<0.05)。结论:舒芬太尼联合丙泊酚全凭静脉麻醉用于胸科手术麻醉效果好,术后清醒快且不良反应发生率低,值得临床推广使用。
    • 高瑞君; 胡振宇; 沈有舟; 李文静
    • 摘要: @@%目的 探讨静脉麻醉在尘肺患者支气管镜肺泡灌洗术中的应用价值.方法 将接受支气管镜治疗术的尘肺患者51例(133次)分为表面麻醉组37例(97次)和静脉麻醉组14例(36次),比较两组操作所需时间、操作过程中患者的反应和术中血压、心率和氧饱和度的变化.结果 表面麻醉组在支气管镜置入后5和10 min的收缩压和心率均高于麻醉前,明显高于同时点的静脉麻醉组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).与表面麻醉组比较,静脉麻醉组支气管镜置入后5min的氧饱和度明显下降,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但在置入后10min时已经恢复.表面麻醉组1例患者因过度紧张未完成灌洗,静脉麻醉组患者均完成灌洗.静脉麻醉组的操作时间明显高于表面麻醉组较长,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).静脉麻醉组出现咳嗽、憋气等刺激反应明显低于表面麻醉组.结论 开展静脉麻醉下的支气管肺泡灌洗术,舒适、安全、有效,值得提倡和推广.
    • 王卡; 田国刚; 田毅; 吴爱珍
    • 摘要: 目的 评价舒芬太尼-氯胺酮-异丙酚复合静脉麻醉在小儿泌尿外科手术中的应用.方法 择期行小儿泌尿外科手术患儿40例,随机数字表法分为芬太尼组(F组)和舒芬太尼组(S组).麻醉诱导时F组静脉注射芬太尼2 μg/kg,S组静脉注射舒芬太尼0.2 μg/kg.记录患儿入室时(T0)、麻醉诱导后5 min (T1)、手术切皮时(T2)以及术毕(T3)时的HR、MAP、SpO2.记录手术时间、术中氯胺酮追加量、苏醒时间、术后躁动及恶心呕吐、寒战、呼吸抑制等不良反应的发生情况.结果 S组在T1、T2时刻HR、MAP明显低于F组,S组术中氯胺酮追加量为(28.0±10.5) mg,明显低于F组的(39.5±14.6) mg (P<0.05).S组躁动发生率为10%,明显低于F组的35%.结论 舒芬太尼-氯胺酮-异丙酚复合静脉麻醉显示出更稳定的心血管效应、更少的术后躁动发生率,具有较好的临床应用价值.
    • 杜娟; 迟云阳; 姜秀良; 马加海
    • 摘要: [目的]观察全凭静脉麻醉下糖尿病患者罗库溴铵肌松效应与术后肌松残余(PORC)的发生率.[方法]择期行腹腔镜下子宫切除手术患者60例,ASA Ⅰ~Ⅱ,依据是否合并2型糖尿病分为糖尿病组(DM组)和非糖尿病组(ND 组),每组30例.全部患者采用全凭静脉麻醉,麻醉诱导时静脉注射罗库溴铵0.6 mg/kg 行气管插管.术中采用四个成串刺激(TOF)监测肌松效应.记录起效时间:从注药至 T1(0.1 Hz 单刺激肌颤搐高度)最大抑制所用时间;维持时间:TOFr(4个成串刺激中第4个肌颤搐与第1个肌颤搐的比值即T4/T1)从0恢复到25%所用时间;恢复指数:TOFr 从25%恢复到75%的时间,以及拔管即刻 TOFr 0.05),术后 PORC 发生率 DM 组高于 ND 组( P <0.05).[结论]与非糖尿病患者比较,全凭静脉麻醉时糖尿病患者罗库溴铵的起效时间、维持时间无显著差异,但 PORC 发生率高且持续时间长.
    • 张田田; 王世端; 黄辉; 孙健; 刘雪
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨右美托咪定-氯胺酮静脉复合用于膝关节镜手术麻醉的可行性.方法 择期行膝关节镜手术的患者50例,年龄18~60岁,ASA Ⅰ级或Ⅱ级,随机分为右美托咪定-氯胺酮组(D-K组)和丙泊酚-芬太尼组(P-F组),每组25例.D-K组给予右美托咪定(负荷量1μg· kg-1,继以1.5 μg·kg-1·h-1持续泵注)和氯胺酮(负荷量0.5 mg·kg-1,继以1 mg·kg-1·h-1持续泵注)静脉复合麻醉;P-F组给予靶控输注丙泊酚(起始靶浓度3 mg·L-1)和静脉注射芬太尼2 μg· kg-1复合麻醉.观察警觉与镇静(OAA/S)评分、脑电双频指数(BIS)、脉搏血氧饱和度(SpO2)等指标,记录麻醉诱导时间、定向力恢复时间以及不良反应情况,术后调查手术者及患者满意度.结果 D-K组患者术中呼吸维持平稳,SpO2均在96%以上,呼气末CO2分压维持正常;P-F组共有19例SpO2低于90%,需要放置通气道和(或)辅助通气,2组差异显著(P<0.05).D-K组术中血流动力学较P-F组更加稳定,但当BIS≤60时心率下降明显.D-K组麻醉诱导时间和定向力恢复时间长于P-F组(P<0.05).2组患者及手术医师对麻醉效果的满意率相仿.结论 右美托咪定-氯胺酮复合可安全用于膝关节镜手术的麻醉,对呼吸无明显抑制作用,可使血流动力学更加稳定,为此类保留自主呼吸的麻醉提供了安全保障.%IM To investigate the feasibility of dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination in knee arthroscopy. METHODS Fifty patients with ASA I or II , aged 18-60 years, scheduled for knee arthroscopy were randomly divided into two groups (25 patients in each) . In the D-K group, dexmedetomidine (a bolus of 1 μg·kg-1 was administered for 10 mins, followed by 1.5 μg · kg-1 · h-1 infusion during the operation) and ketamine (a bolus of 0.5 mg-kg-1 was administered, followed by 1 mg-kg-1· h-1 infusion during the operation) were applied. In the P-F group, target-controlled infusion of propofol (the target plasma concentration was set at 3 μg·L-1) and 2 μg·kg-1 fentanyl were given. The observer' s assessment of alertness/sedation (OAA/S)scale, bispeotral index (BIS), respiratory rate (RR), end-tidal carbon dioxide tension (PeiCO2), mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) , pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2) and heart rate ( HR) were continuously monitored. Induction time, orientation recovery time and adverse reactions were also recorded. Level of satisfaction with quality of anesthesia was evaluated by patients and surgeons. RESULTS The patients in the group D-K did not have significant respiratory depression (SpO2 ≥ 96% and PprCO2 remained normal) . In the P-F group, 19 patients (SpO2 ≤S 90%) altogether had to insert orophatyngeal airway or give assisted ventilation. Compared with the P-F group, the hemodynamic in the D-K group was more stable, but HR decreased significantly when BIS ≤ 60. The induction time and orientation recovery time of D-K group were longer than those of P-F group (P < 0.05) . There was no significant difference in the level of satisfaction with quality of anesthesia evaluated by patients and surgeons between two groups. CONCLUSION Dexmedetomidine-ketamine combination has light influence on breathing and more stable hemodynamic and is safe and feasible in knee arthroseopy.
    • 徐文; 林世清
    • 摘要: [目的]比较俯卧位腰椎手术患者全凭静脉麻醉和七氟烷平衡麻醉对术后肺功能的影响.[方法]选择择期行俯卧位腰椎手术的患者96例.美国麻醉医师学会分级I~Ⅱ级.随机均分为全凭静脉组(T组)和七氟烷组(S组)各48例.T组术中静脉泵注芬太尼和丙泊酚维持麻醉,S组吸入七氟烷和50%N2O维持麻醉.术前和术后分别测量两组患者的用力肺活量(FVC),第1秒用力呼气量(FEV1),最大呼气中断流量(MEF 25~75),最大呼气流量(PEF).记录两组患者的手术时间、麻醉时间.[结果]术前两组患者一般资料和肺功能参数比较差异无显著性(P>0.05),术后所有呼吸参数较术前均有下降(P<0.01),而且TIVA组患者的FVC下降比BAL组更明显(P<0.05).[结论]TIVA和用七氟烷BAL用于俯卧位腰椎手术患者,术后短期内均可出现肺功能减退.TIVA患者全麻苏醒后的FVC相对术前下降比用七氟烷BAL更明显.%[Objective]To compare the postoperative lung function between total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) and balanced anesthesia(BAL) with sevoflurane in patients undergoing lumbar surgery at prone position.[Methods]A total of 96 patients(American Society of Anesthesiologists Ⅰ~ Ⅱ ) undergoing elective lumbar surgery were randomly assigned to TIVA group(group T) and BAL with sevoflurane group(group S).Group T was intravenously injected with fentanyl and propofol for maintenance anesthesia.Group S inhaled sevoflurane and 50% N2O for maintenance anesthesia.Forced vital capacity(FVC), forced expiratory volume in 1s(FEV1), mid-expiratory flow(MEF 25~75) and peak expiratory flow(PEF) were measured before and after anesthesia.Anesthesia and operation durations were also recorded.[Results]There was no significant difference in the general data and lung function parameters between two group before operation( P >0.05).Compared with before operation, lung function parameters decreased after operation( P <0.01) and the FVC of TIVA group decreased more significantly than BAL group( P <0.05).[Conclusion]Both TIVA and BAL with sevoflurane in patients undergoing lumbar surgery at prone position may occur the reduction of lung function in the short term after operation.Compared with before operation, the FVC of TIVA patients after general anesthesia recovery decrease more obviously than BAL with sevoflurane.
    • 宋志鸿; 石缨; 薛晓东; 张晋东
    • 摘要: Objective To compare the effects between controlled infusion of propofol combined with fentanyl or sufentanil on patients who underwent gastric surgery. Methods Forty adult patients of ASA grade Ⅰ or Ⅱ who underwent elective gastric surgery were randomly divided into two groups, sufentanil group ( group S, n= 20 ) and fentany1 group ( group F,n = 20 ). Anesthesia was induced with midazo1am, propofol and sufentanil or fentanyl. After tracheal intubation, patients in group S received continuous intravenous infusion of sufentanil at a speed of 0.02 ~ 0.05 μg · kg- 1 · min- 1 while patients in group F received a bolus of fentanyl 1 ~ 2 μg/kg when necessary. Anesthesia was maintained by target-controlled infusion of propofol with initial target concentration of 2 μg/ml, dose was increased progressively until satisfied anesthesia was achieved.Sufentanil infusion was stopped after skin closure. The anesthetic efficacies of the two groups were evaluated based on hemodynamic changes ( MAP and HR ) at seven time points throughout the operation. After operation, time to spontaneous respiration recovery, eye opening and extubation were recorded. The OAA/S score was evaluated at 5 minutes after extubation. Results Patients in group F experienced significantly higher MAP after tracheal intubation and headpins insertion ( P < 0.05 ). Patients in group S experienced significantly lower HR during operation and skin closure ( P < 0.05 ). Time to spontaneous respiration recovery, eye opening and extubation was significantly shorter in group S than in group F ( P < 0.05 ). The OAA/S score was significantly higher in group S ( P < 0.05 ). No significant difference of incidence of postoperative complications was found between the two groups ( P > 0.05 ). Conclusion Compared with fentanyl, the use of sufentanil infusion in combination with target controlled infusion of propofol provide more stable hemodynamic changes during gastric surgery. Recovery from anesthesia of propofol sufentanil is faster than that of propofol fentanyl.%目的 评价胃部手术患者丙泊酚靶控输注复合舒芬太尼或芬太尼麻醉的效果.方法 择期胃部手术患者40例,ASA I级或II级,随机分为2组,每组20例.丙泊酚加舒芬太尼组(S组)和丙泊酚加芬太尼组(F组),术中S组持续输注舒芬太尼0.02~0.05 μg·kg-1·min-1,F组单次静脉注射芬太尼,每次1~2 μg/kg.分别于麻醉诱导前(T0,基础值)、气管插管前即刻(T1)、气管插管后即刻(T2)、切皮后即刻(T3)、胃部手术约50%(T4)、皮下缝合开始后即刻(T5)、拔除气管导管即刻(T6)和拔除气管导管后30 min(T7)各时间点记录平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR).术后恢复阶段观察患者的自主呼吸恢复时间、轻唤睁眼时间、拔管时间,并于拔管后5 min 记录患者的警觉/镇静评分(OAA/S评分).结果 F组在T2、T3、T5时MAP及HR均高于S组(P0.05).结论 在胃部手术时联合应用丙泊酚和舒芬太尼进行全凭静脉麻醉(TIVA),能提供更为稳定的血流动力学,患者术后苏醒快、苏醒质量高,麻醉可控性更好.
    • 王晶青; 朱洪生
    • 摘要: 目的 观察电针辅助静脉麻醉用于无痛人流的血流动力学变化及术后镇痛效果.方法 120例无痛人流患者,随机分成两组,电针组和对照组,每组60例,记录无痛人流手术中丙泊酚的用量,手术前、中、后平均动脉压,心率,血氧饱和度的变化,以及术后镇痛评级.结果 电针组丙泊酚用量明显减少,血压、心率及血氧饱和度平稳,术后镇痛优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 电针辅助静脉麻醉用于无痛人流,可有效减少丙泊酚用量,减少呼吸抑制的发生,使呼吸循环更趋于稳定,增强术后镇痛效果.
    • 黄小辉; 王宗朝
    • 摘要: 目的 探索芬太尼或瑞芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉用于经鼻盲探气管插管的安全性及有效性.方法 ASAⅠ-Ⅱ级拟在全身麻醉气管插管下行择期手术的患者80例,年龄18~64岁,以芬太尼2μg/kg或瑞芬太尼1μg/kg、异丙酚2 mg/kg静脉诱导后随机分为4组,每组20例:异丙酚4 mg/(kg·h)(P4)组、异丙酚6 mg/(kg·h)(P6)组、异丙酚8 mg/(kg·h)(P8)组和异丙酚4 mg/(kg·h)+瑞芬太尼5μg/(kg·h)(R)组,微量泵持续静脉注射,行经鼻盲探气管插管.观察各组患者麻醉诱导插管过程中循环、呼吸(MAP、DBP、SBP、HR、ECG、RR和SPO2)改变及盲探气管插管的第1次成功率;记录插管过程中知晓发生率和后鼻孔损伤出血等并发症.结果 各组循环稳定,但P8、R组插管时循环变化较小,R组插管时部分患者HR较慢;各组呼吸均有不同程度抑制,但P8、R组最明显,R组呼吸频率明显低于其它3组,吸氧后各组SPO2均能维持正常;P8、R组盲探气管插管的第1次成功率明显高于其它2组.结论 芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉较瑞芬太尼复合异丙酚静脉麻醉用于经鼻盲探气管插管更安全、可靠,诱导后异丙酚维持量以8 mg/(kg·h)为宜.
    • 史斌; 孙庆旭
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨不同麻醉方法及麻醉深度对胃癌手术患者细胞免疫功能的影响,为临床手术采取合理的麻醉方法提供科学根据.方法:将80例胃癌手术患者随机分成静吸复合麻醉组(A组)和单纯静脉麻醉组(B组),每组40例,组内再各分为深麻醉组(AH组,BH组)和浅麻醉组(AL组,BL组).深麻醉组和浅麻醉组脑电双频指数(bispectral index,BIS)分别为35~50和55~68.两组分别于麻醉前、术毕及术后72 h检测外周血T淋巴细胞亚群及NK细胞数量.结果:术毕各组CD3+、CD4+、CD4+/CD8+及NK细胞数量均较麻醉前下降(P<0.05),同种麻醉方法AL组、BL组较AH组、BH组下降明显(P<0.05);术后72 h各组各项指标均恢复至麻醉前水平;在相同时段不同麻醉方法深、浅麻醉组之间各指标差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论:静吸复合麻醉与单纯静脉麻醉均可影响患者的细胞免疫功能,但深麻醉状态较浅麻醉状态影响小,可能与患者应激反应有关.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号