您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 经胆囊管

经胆囊管

经胆囊管的相关文献在1986年到2023年内共计1483篇,主要集中在外科学、内科学、特种医学 等领域,其中期刊论文65篇、会议论文3篇、专利文献1415篇;相关期刊41种,包括中国内镜杂志、浙江临床医学、腹部外科等; 相关会议3种,包括2011年全国微创外科高峰论坛暨《中国微创外科杂志》创刊十周年庆典、第23届肝胆胰外科学术经验交流会、2006年浙江省医学会微创外科学年会等;经胆囊管的相关文献由2237位作者贡献,包括乔铁、不公告发明人、耿金宏等。

经胆囊管—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:65 占比:4.38%

会议论文>

论文:3 占比:0.20%

专利文献>

论文:1415 占比:95.41%

总计:1483篇

经胆囊管—发文趋势图

经胆囊管

-研究学者

  • 乔铁
  • 不公告发明人
  • 耿金宏
  • 胡海
  • 赵步长
  • 张诚
  • 杨玉龙
  • 赵刚
  • 王玉玲
  • 管辉球
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

学科

年份

    • 冯矗; 罗浩; 陈飞; 李晓宇
    • 摘要: 胆总管结石是普外科最常见也是最严重的胆道疾病之一。主要引起梗阻性黄疸、急性化脓性胆管炎,急性重症坏死性胰腺炎,继发性肝脓肿等,长期胆总管结石会引起继发性肝硬化等严重并发症。随着腹腔镜、胆道镜等内窥镜技术的飞速发展,微创治疗已成为目前肝胆手术中的主流,手术方式主要包括腹腔镜下胆囊切除术(LC)+胆总管探查取石术(LCBDE),可根据结石大小数量灵活施行胆总管一期缝合或T管外引流。近年来,腹腔镜下经胆囊管途径胆总管探查取石术(LTCBDE)在切除胆囊后,经胆囊管伸入胆道镜完成胆总管结石的探查取石,使患者通过一次手术操作获得较为彻底的治疗。其无需切开胆总管,具有创伤小、疼痛轻、手术时间短、恢复进程快等优点,受到临床外科医师广泛的关注[1],该手术方式也在各大医疗机构逐步开展。同济大学附属上海市普陀区人民医院自2009年实施第1例腹腔镜下经胆总管途径探查取石术以来,目前取石手术的成功率超过97%,本研究主要回顾性分析了上海市普陀区人民医院2013年1月至2021年12月施行腹腔镜胆总管探查术治疗胆总管结石的相关资料,现报告如下。
    • 宋涛; 王艳丽; 王鹏; 陈学峰; 韩洁; 姚英民
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔镜下经胆囊管途径治疗胆总管结石的可行性、安全性.方法:回顾分析2015年1月至2018年1月为135例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者行腹腔镜手术的临床资料,其中65例行腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术(LTCBDE);70例行腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术(LCBDE).对比两组患者一般情况、手术时间、术中出血量、腹腔引流时间、住院时间、住院费用、并发症发生率.结果:两组患者一般情况、术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),LTCBDE组术后住院时间、术后腹腔引流时间、住院费用、手术时间优于LCBDE组(P<0.05).结论:LTCBDE可避免术后T管引流,提高生活质量,缩短住院时间,具有经济优势.
    • 李荣霖
    • 摘要: 近年来腹腔镜下经胆囊管胆总管探查术(laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration,LTCBDE)的应用越来越广泛,对于胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的诊治优势突出,除了具有创伤小、恢复快的特点,还具有医疗效率高、医疗花费低的优势.本文通过介绍该技术的发展历史、手术方法、适应证、禁忌症、优势、临床应用等,使读者对该技术获得充分了解,进而探索出对于肝胆疾病以更合理、更规范的有效治疗.
    • 何招才; 武步强; 马雪平; 王武; 栗彦琪; 崔广
    • 摘要: 目的:比较腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)联合不同入路的腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的疗效,以评价和探讨各种腹腔镜胆总管探查术入路的优劣和临床价值.方法:回顾性分析接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术联合不同入路的腹腔镜胆总管探查术后一期缝合治疗的67例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者的临床资料.根据手术方式分为LC联合经胆囊管汇入部微切开入路的腹腔镜胆总管探查术组(LC+TC-LCBDE,n=28)和LC联合经胆总管切开入路的腹腔镜胆总管探查术组(LC+TD-LCBDE,n=39),比较2组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后住院时间、腹腔引流时间、术后并发症以及术后随访结果.结果:LC+TC-LCBDE组腹腔引流时间为(3.11±1.53)d,少于LC+TD-LCBDE组的(3.96±1.83)d(P0.05).结论:LC联合经胆囊管汇入部微切开入路的腹腔镜胆总管探查术效果好,并发症少,患者恢复快,值得临床推广.
    • 卿哲; 段键; 夏仁品
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔镜联合胆道镜经胆囊管行胆总管探查的适应证及手术技巧.方法:2016年10月至2017年10月采用双镜联合经胆囊管行胆总管探查术治疗125例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者.结果:122例(97.6%)成功完成手术,1例因结石直径较大(约2 cm),2例因急性胆囊炎、胆囊管水肿粘连严重,改行腹腔镜胆总管探查取石术.手术时间60~130 min,平均(80.4±15.7) min;术中出血量5~20 mL,平均(10.4±4.5) mL;术后住院2~7d,平均(4.3±1.9)d;住院费用12 130.2~21 378.5元,平均(16 542.0±2 375.6)元.术后1例出现结石残留,残石率为0.8%(1/122);并发症发生率为3.3%(4/122).结论:对于胆囊结石合并胆总管结石,尤其继发性胆总管结石,双镜联合经胆囊管胆总管探查取石疗效良好,严格把握手术指征,此术式可作为可行的治疗方法之一.
    • 余海峰; 鲁光锐; 殷佩; 郭通; 俞亚红
    • 摘要: Objective To compare the safety and applicability of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration(LTCBDE)and combined duodenoscopic,laparoscopic and choledochoscopic common bile duct exploration(namely Tri-scopy common bile duct exploration)in treatment of cholecystolithiasis.Methods We retrospectively enrolled 410 consecutive patients with choledocholithiasis.Among these people,130 patients received LTCBDE(group A),and 280 patients underwent Tri-scopy common bile duct exploration(group B).The variables of two groups(including the demographic factors,operative time,intraoperative blood loss,length of hospital stay,cost of hospitalization stay,stone clearance,and postoperative complications)were collected and analyzed.Results There were no significant differences between two groups in age,gender,jaundice,serum ALT,the diameter of the common bile duct and the number of stones(with all P>0.05).The mean diameter of the stones in group A was smaller than that in group B(P0.05).Group A had shorter operation time[(105.32±29.60)min vs(124.47±44.88)min)],less blood loss[(27.26±14.33)ml vs.(68.12±16.47)ml],less hospital stay [(5.38±1.08)d vs(7.35±1.36)d] and lower cost[¥(25182.16±3190.35)vs ¥(47389.87±2608.01)],with all P0.05).结论 与三镜联合术比较,腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查取石术手术时间短、术中出血少、恢复快、费用低,适合较小的胆总管结石.临床医生可根据患者病情选择合适的手术方式.
    • 赵臣; 贾国洪; 贾志芳
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨腹腔镜经胆囊管胆总管探查术(laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration,LTCBDE)的经验及其应用价值.方法:回顾分析2014年8月至2016年6月为65例胆囊结石合并胆总管结石患者行LTCBDE的临床资料.结果:63例成功完成LTCBDE,其中14例采用胆囊管汇入部微切开技术;2例因操作困难改行切开胆总管前壁取石.2例患者术中胆道镜探查未发现结石.1例患者术后2个月因腹痛行胆道磁共振检查提示胆总管结石,结石残余率1.6%,行内镜逆行胰胆管造影+内镜十二指肠乳头括约肌切开术处理.术后63例患者随访3 ~19个月,无腹痛、发热、黄疸等异常发现.结论:LTCBDE需要选择合适的患者,只有严格把握手术适应证,才能最大限度地发挥LTCBDE的优势.%Objective:To discuss the experience and application value of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE).Methods:Retrospective analysis was made on the clinical data of 65 patients who suffered from choledocholithiasis and cholecystolithiasis and underwent LTCBDE from Aug.2014 to Jun.2016.Results:LTCBDE was successful in 63 patients,14 cases completed cystic duct micro-incision combined with laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.2 cases were converted to common bile duct approach.No stones were found in the common bile duct in 2 patients during surgery.After two months,one patient underwent the magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography because of postoperative abdominal pain,and stones were found in common bile duct of this patient,the rate of residual stones was 1.6% (1/63),this patient then received endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography + endoscopic sphincterotomy.After surgery 63 patients were followed up for 3 to 19 months.There were no abdominal pain,fever,jaundice or other abnormal findings.Conclusions:LTCBDE requires appropriate patient.Only strict grasping the indications of LTCBDE can help surgeons maximize the benefits of LTCBDE.
    • 陈超波; 胡伟东; 许紫鹏; 顾盐炎; 赵刚
    • 摘要: Objective:To evaluate the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration in the treatment of gallstones and common bile duct stones. Methods:A total of 152 patients who were diagnosed with gallstones and common bile duct stones from Jan. 2015 to Jan. 2017 were enrolled in the retrospective analysis study. Among them,66 cases were in laparoscop-ic transcystic common bile duct exploration ( LTCBDE) group,while the other 86 cases were in laparoscopic common bile duct explora-tion ( LCBDE) group. These patients were followed up for 6 months. Statistical analysis was performed on the general condition,opera-tion time,intraoperative bleeding,intraperitoneal drainage time,hospitalization time,total cost of hospitalization and complications. Re-sults:There were no conversions to laparotomy and no deaths in the two groups. The difference of operation time between LCBDE group and LTCBDE group was not statistically significant (P>0. 05). The postoperative hospital stay and the time of intraperitoneal drainage were shortened,the cost of hospitalization was reduced,and postoperative bile leakage were lower in the LTCBDE group,and the differ-ences were statistically significant (P0.05),LTCBDE组术后住院时间、术后腹腔引流时间、住院费用、术后胆漏发生率优于LCBDE组(P<0.05).LCBDE组中13例患者行T管引流,LTCBDE组均行胆总管一期缝合,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:LTCBDE可避免术后T管引流,缩短了住院时间,术后并发症少,具有安全、经济、有效的微创优势.
    • 满泉; 庞慧芳; 郭伟
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨腹腔镜术中联合胆道镜经胆囊管胆道探查(laparoscopic transcystic common bill duct exploration,LTCBDE)并取石术实施日间手术的可行性.方法 回顾性分析2016年2月至2017年5月在首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院由同一组手术团队完成的39例择期行LTCBDE治疗胆囊结石合并胆总管结石的临床资料.所有患者均在门诊完成术前检查和术前评估;患者于手术当日入院,术后24 h内离院回家;回家12 h内电话随访,术后第7日门诊随访.结果 39例患者均顺利完成LTCBDE,无胆总管切开及中转开腹,术后所有患者均于入院24 h内出院,其中手术当天出院37例,过夜观察次日晨出院2例.手术时间45~113 min,平均手术时间(72.5±24.8)min;39例患者术后6 h均进流食,术后腹部切口疼痛23例,恶心、呕吐12例,伤口少量渗血2例,给予常规对症处理后缓解.住院费用平均(9134.6±824.4)元.随访至今无腹部不适症状.结论 严格掌握适应证,选择性施行LTCBDE的日间手术是安全可行的,适合有条件的大型医院开展.%Objective To investigate the feasibility of laparoscopy combined with transcystic common bile duct exploration in ambulatory surgery. Methods Exploratory research was performed on the clinical outcome of 39 patients by LTCBDE between Feb. 2016 to May 2017 in Beijing Friendship Hospital. Results Thirty-nine LTCBDE were perfomed. No conversion to open surgery or incision of common bile duct was performed. All patients were discharged during 24 h after operation. Of which 37 cases were discharged on the day of surgery, 2 cases were discharged the following morning. The operation duration was 45~113 minutes, the average opera-tion duration was (72.5±24.8) min. Thirty-nine patients were given semi-liquid diet 6 h after the operation. Pain at abdominal incision was described in 23 cases. Postoperative nausea and vomiting occurred in 12 cases. Wound bleeding happened in 2 cases, and treated with routine treatment. The average hospitalization expenses was (9134.6±824.4) yuan. Conclusion Day-case LTCBDE is safe, and feasible. It is suitable for large experienced hos-pitals.
    • 刘勇; 韩威; 龚平明; 石威
    • 摘要: 目的 分析腹腔镜下经胆囊管治疗继发胆总管结石的临床疗效.方法 选取在该院接受治疗的胆结石继发胆总管结石的患者120例,按照随机的方法平均分给观察组与对照组,每组60例患者.观察组实施腹腔镜下经胆囊管治疗继发胆总管结石的方法治疗,对照组采用传统的腹腔镜下胆总管探查T管引流术.治疗一段时间后,比较两组患者的手术时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、术中出血情况、并发症的总发生率和住院时间.结果 观察组的术中手术时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、术中出血情况、并发症的发生率和住院时间均少于对照组;其中观察组在住院时间(5.4±2.1)d明显低于观察组(16.5±6.9)d,术后水、电解质紊乱、伤口疼痛和感染等并发症总发生率(6.66%)明显低于对照组的总发生率(61.67%),差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论 腹腔镜下经胆囊管治疗胆结石合并胆总管结石优于传统的腹腔镜下胆总管探查T管引流术,术中的出血量少、更安全且并发症少,恢复快,建议广泛使用.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号