您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 烧伤,吸入性

烧伤,吸入性

烧伤,吸入性的相关文献在1998年到2021年内共计93篇,主要集中在外科学、临床医学、内科学 等领域,其中期刊论文93篇、专利文献448283篇;相关期刊29种,包括中华劳动卫生职业病杂志、中国临床护理、中华护理杂志等; 烧伤,吸入性的相关文献由330位作者贡献,包括郭光华、朱峰、王年云等。

烧伤,吸入性—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:93 占比:0.02%

专利文献>

论文:448283 占比:99.98%

总计:448376篇

烧伤,吸入性—发文趋势图

烧伤,吸入性

-研究学者

  • 郭光华
  • 朱峰
  • 王年云
  • 刘名倬
  • 廖新成
  • 杨宗城
  • 付忠华
  • 张国安
  • 贾赤宇
  • 冯世海
  • 期刊论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 蒋勇; 王康安; 王宝丽; 胡伦阳; 朱邦晖; 伍国胜; 孙瑜; 夏照帆
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨合并烧伤总面积<30%体表总面积(TBSA)的吸入性损伤患者的流行病学特征及治疗结局. 方法 对2008年1月-2016年12月海军军医大学第一附属医院收治的符合入选标准的266例合并烧伤总面积<30%TBSA的吸入性损伤患者的病历资料进行同顾性观察性研究.统计患者的性别、年龄、受伤地点、吸入性损伤致伤因素、吸入性损伤严重程度、合并烧伤总面积、气管切开情况、气管切开时间、机械通气情况、是否入住重症监护病房(ICU)、支气管肺泡灌洗液微生物培养结果、总住院天数、住ICU天数、机械通气天数、呼吸道感染情况.采用单因素和多因素线性回归分析筛选影响患者住ICU天数、总住院天数、机械通气天数的危险因素.采用单因素和多因素logistic同归分析筛选影响患者呼吸道感染的危险因素. 结果 266例患者中男190例、女76例,年龄主要集中在≥21岁且<65岁(217例),常见的受伤地点是密闭空间,吸入性损伤最常见致伤因素是热空气,轻度和中度吸入性损伤较为常见,合并烧伤总面积为9.00%(3.25%,18.00%)TBSA.在111例接受气管切开术的患者中,大部分患者在被送至海军军医大学第一附属医院前接受了气管切开术.本组患者总住院天数为27(10,55)d,160例入住ICU患者住ICU天数为15.5(6.0,40.0)d,109例行机械通气患者机械通气天数为6.0(1.3,11.5)d.119例患者在住院期间发生过呼吸道感染,检出了548株共35种病原体,以革兰阴性菌为主.单因素线性回归分析显示,年龄、吸入性损伤致伤因素、合并烧伤总面积、吸入性损伤严重程度(中度和重度)、气管切开情况、机械通气情况和呼吸道感染情况是患者总住院天数的影响因素(β=-0.198、-0.224、0.021、0.127、0.164、-0.298、0.357、0.447,95%置信区间=-0.397~-0.001、-0.395 ~-0.053、0.015~0.028、0.009~0.263、0.008~0.319、-0.419~-0.176、0.242~0.471、0.340~0.555,P<0.1).多因素线性回归分析显示,行机械通气、有呼吸道感染是影响患者总住院天数的独立危险因素(β=0.146、0.383,95%置信区间=0.022~0.271、0.261~0.506,P<0.05或P<0.01).单因素线性回归分析显示,吸入性损伤致伤因素、合并烧伤总面积、吸入性损伤严重程度(中度和重度)、气管切开情况(未行气管切开术、预防性气管切开术)、机械通气情况、呼吸道感染情况是患者住ICU天数的影响因素(β=0.225、0.008、0.237、0.203、-0.408、-0.334、0.309、0.523,95%置信区间=0.053~0.502、0.006~0.010、-0.018~0.457、-0.022~0.428、-0.575~-0.241、-0.687~-0.018、0.132~0.486、0.369~0.678,P<0.1).多因素线性回归分析显示,有呼吸道感染是影响患者住ICU天数的独立危险因素(β=0.440,95%置信区间=0.278~0.601,P<0.01).单因素线性回归分析显示,受伤地点、吸入性损伤致伤因素(烟雾、化学气体)、合并烧伤总面积、吸入性损伤严重程度(中度和重度)、气管切开情况(未行气管切开术、预防性气管切开术)、呼吸道感染情况是患者机械通气天数的影响因素(β=-0.300、0.545、0.163、0.005、0.487、0.799、-0.791、-0.736、0.300,95%置信区间=-0.565~-0.034、0.145~0.946、0.051~1.188、0.001~0.009、0.127~0.847、0.436~1.162、-1.075~-0.508、-1.243~-0.229、0.005~0.605,P<0.1).多因素线性回归分析显示,吸入烟雾、重度吸入性损伤、有呼吸道感染是影响患者机械通气天数的独立危险因素(β=0.210、0.495、0.263,95%置信区间=0.138~0.560、0.143~0.848、0.007~0.519,P<0.05或P<0.01).单因素logistic回归分析显示,年龄、受伤地点、合并烧伤总面积(10%~19%TBSA、20%~29%TBSA)、吸入性损伤严重程度(中度和重度)、气管切开情况(预防性气管切开术、未行气管切开术)、机械通气情况是患者呼吸道感染的影响因素(比值比=1.079、0.815、1.400、1.331、1.803、1.958、0.990、0.320、3.094,95%置信区间=0.840~1.362、0.641~1.044、1.122~1.526、1.028~1.661、1.344~2.405、1.460~2.612、0.744~1.320、0.241~0.424、2.331~4.090,P<0.1).多因素logistic回归分析显示,行机械通气是影响患者呼吸道感染的独立危险因素(比值比=4.300,95%置信区间=2.152~8.624,P<0.01). 结论 合并<30%TBSA烧伤总面积的吸入性损伤人群以中青年男性为主.影响合并烧伤总面积<30%TBSA的吸入性损伤患者院内结局的因素包括吸入烟雾、吸入性损伤严重程度、行机械通气、有呼吸道感染.此外,预防性气管切开术在降低中度或重度吸入性损伤患者呼吸道感染中有潜在价值.
    • 豆哲; 张国安
    • 摘要: 目的 了解我国烧伤患者吸入性损伤的流行病学特征.方法 采用系统综述的方法.以"吸入性损伤、呼吸道烧伤、喉烧伤"为检索词检索《中国期刊全文数据库》《万方数据库》《中国生物医学文献数据库》,以"burns、inhalation injury"为检索词检索《PubMed》《Embase》数据库,检索各数据库自建库起至2019年1月收录的有关我国烧伤患者吸入性损伤的流行病学特征的回顾性研究.对纳入文献进行数据提取,内容包括第1作者、研究单位、研究年份/年限、研究对象、烧伤患者数、吸入性损伤发生率以及吸入性损伤患者性别、年龄、致伤原因、病死率、死亡原因.结果 本研究共纳入24篇文献,第1作者来自全国多个单位,为国内多个省/市的重点烧伤救治单位针对1958-2016年收治住院烧伤患者或严重烧伤患者吸入性损伤发生情况进行的单中心或多中心流行病学统计研究,烧伤患者数为103~64 320例.住院烧伤患者吸入性损伤发生率为4.89%~11.28%,未见明显趋势变化;严重烧伤患者吸入性损伤的发生率仍然较高,大部分文献报道为19.09%~32.38%.吸入性损伤患者男性多于女性,男女比为1.61:1.00~4.95:1.00;以青壮年为高发人群,致伤原因以火焰烧伤为主.吸入性损伤患者病死率为5.17%~58.67%,其中2000年以来病死率为5.17%~24.75%,各地区医院报道后期病死率较前期有明显下降.吸入性损伤患者的死亡原因有上呼吸道梗阻、脓毒症、呼吸功能衰竭及肺部严重感染.结论 1958-2016年,我国烧伤患者吸入性损伤发生率未见明显趋势变化;吸入性损伤以青壮年男性为高发人群,致伤原因以火焰烧伤为主,2000年以来的病死率普遍较前期下降.
    • 蒋南红; 王德运; 陈斓; 谢卫国
    • 摘要: 目的 介绍新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)疫情期间烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者的救治体会. 方法 2020年2月1日-3月1日COVID-19疫情高发期间武汉大学同仁医院暨武汉市第三医院烧伤科收治烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者6例,其中男4例、女2例,年龄为21 ~ 63岁,入院时间为伤后2~4h,烧伤总面积为1% ~ 20% TBSA,Ⅲ度烧伤面积为1% ~12%TBSA.其中1例重度吸入性损伤、2例轻度吸入性损伤、3例中度吸入性损伤.患者入院时体温均正常,近2周无发热、咳嗽.入院时,1例患者胸部CT示双肺下叶、左肺上叶见多发条片状及结节稍高密度影,2例患者胸部CT示双肺纹理增粗,其余患者胸部CT正常.入院后给予6例患者常规治疗,期间医护人员注意防护,并参照COVID-19诊疗方案筛查COVID-19.伤后1、3、6、9d取患者静脉血检测白细胞计数、中性粒细胞、淋巴细胞绝对值、降钙素原水平.伤后3、6d行实时荧光定量反转录PCR新型冠状病毒核酸检测.入院后记录患者体温.记录伤后1周内胸部CT检查结果和患者的预后情况.呈正态分布的计量资料以x±s表示,非正态分布的计量资料以M(P25,P75)表示. 结果 (1)伤后1、3、6、9d患者的白细胞计数分别为(19.8±3.8)×109/L、(17.2±3.4)×109/L、(13.3±3.1)×109/L、(11.1±1.6)×109/L,中性粒细胞分别为0.919±0.019、0.899 ±0.011、0.855 ±0.034、0.811±0.035,淋巴细胞绝对值分别为(0.65 ±0.18)×109/L、(0.65 ±0.24)×109/L、(0.91 ±0.34)×109/L、(1.23±0.42)×109/L,降钙素原水平分别为0.49(0.36,1.64)、0.39 (0.26,0.73)、0.28(0.18,0.33)、0.12(0.11,0.20) ng/mL;白细胞计数、中性粒细胞均高于正常值,呈下降趋势;淋巴细胞绝对值于伤后6d起恢复至正常值;降钙素原水平均高于正常值.(2)伤后3、6d,6例患者新型冠状病毒核酸检测结果均呈阴性.6例患者体温波动范围为36.5 ~38.6°C.伤后1周内6例患者胸部CT未筛查出COVID-19典型影像学特征.治疗14~ 32 d,6例患者均治愈出院. 结论 在COVID-19疫情期间,烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者应在做好医护防护的条件下救治,同时应积极排查病毒,减少医患感染COVID-19风险.
    • 王树明; 刘锐; 刘振宝; 田枫; 井维斌
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨低分子肝素钠持续气道内给药联合静脉滴注乌司他丁治疗吸入性损伤的效果.方法 选择2017年1月至2019年12月黑龙江省医院烧伤科收治的24例大面积烧伤合并吸入性损伤致急性肺损伤的患者,回顾性分析其病例资料.按随机数字表法将患者分为治疗组和对照组,每组12例.对照组给予常规治疗,包括补液抗休克、创面处理、营养支持、抗感染和气道管理等综合治疗.治疗组在对照组治疗的基础上,给予低分子肝素钠溶液持续气道内滴入(100 AxaIU/kg,1次/d)联合静脉滴注乌司他丁(10万U/次,3次/d)治疗2周.治疗前、治疗2周后,采用急性生理与慢性健康评估Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)评分评估2组患者总体病情;采用放射免疫分析法定量测定2组患者血浆肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)和C反应蛋白(CRP)水平;对患者血气指标(氧分压、二氧化碳分压、血液pH值及氧合指数)进行测定,并观察2组患者治疗2周后的病死率.数据比较采用t检验和x2检验.结果 治疗前,对照组和治疗组患者APACHEⅡ评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗2周后,治疗组患者APACHEⅡ评分(12.1±3.3)分,明显低于对照组[(17.3±4.2)分],2组比较差异有统计学意义(t=6.31,P<0.05).治疗前,对照组和治疗组患者血浆TNF-α和CRP水平比较,差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05);治疗2周后,治疗组患者血浆TNF-α和CRP分别为(4.3±0.4)、(10.1±3.7)μg/L,明显低于对照组[(23.1±4.2)、(26.6±4.4)μg/L],2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=4.32、3.34,P值均小于0.05).治疗前,对照组和治疗组患者氧分压、二氧化碳分压、血液pH值及氧合指数比较,差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05);治疗2周后,对照组和治疗组患者血液pH值分别为7.43 ±0.06、7.38 ±0.23,2组比较差异无统计学意义(t=0.18,P>0.05);治疗组的氧分压和氧合指数分别为(91.4 ±4.1) mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133 kPa)、351.2±31.5,明显高于对照组[(73.6±3.8) mmHg、286.3 ±21.1],2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=3.25、2.56,P值均小于0.05);治疗组患者二氧化碳分压为(35.1±3.9) mmHg,明显低于对照组[(41.8±3.2)mmHg],差异有统计学意义(=2.13,P <0.05).治疗2周后,治疗组的病死率为8.33% (1/12),与对照组[25.00% (3/12)]比较明显降低,差异有统计学意义(x2=4.26,P<0.05).结论 低分子肝素钠持续气道内给药联合静脉滴注乌司他丁治疗吸入性损伤可明显抑制炎症反应,改善肺功能,降低病死率.
    • 马捷; 邓津菊; 吴健; 路若楠
    • 摘要: 氢氟酸吸入性损伤虽发病率较低,但治疗棘手,轻者咳嗽、咽痛,重者可发展为急性呼吸窘迫综合征危及生命,还可导致罕见的肺部疾病如反应性气道功能障碍综合征及肺泡蛋白沉积症.目前对氢氟酸吸入性损伤尚无明确的诊疗规范,笔者通过查阅国内外有关文献,总结了氢氟酸吸入性损伤的发病率、致伤机制、临床诊断及治疗,并提出脉搏轮廓心输出量监测及体外膜氧合呼吸支持治疗重症患者有较大的应用前景,以供同行参考.
    • 程雨虹; 孟美芬; 陈丽娟; 刘文军
    • 摘要: 目的 检索、评价、总结国内外关于烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者气管切开管理的最佳证据,为临床实践与标准制订提供参考.方法 系统检索万方、知网、PubMed、中国医脉通指南网和美国烧伤协会等数据库、指南网站以及专业协会的所有证据,包括临床决策、指南、证据总结、系统评价及专家共识.检索时限为建库至2019年4月30日.由2名经过循证培训的研究人员独立进行文献质量评价与证据提取.结果 本研究共纳入22篇文献,总结出74条最佳证据.结论 临床上应用证据时,需充分考虑具体的临床情景,结合专业判断与患者意愿,针对性地选用证据,从而提升护理质量,降低烧伤合并性损伤气管切开患者并发症的发生率,改善其预后.
    • 孙超; 黄华星; 邓献
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨核苷酸结合寡聚化结构域样受体蛋白3(NLRP3)炎性小体、炎性因子、半胱氨酸天冬氨酸蛋白酶-1(Caspase-1)与烧伤合并吸入性损伤的预后相关性.方法 回顾性分析2015年3月至2019年12月北海市人民医院烧伤外科收治的47例烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的临床资料.根据患者住院期间病情恢复情况分为预后良好组(n =19)和预后不良组(n=28).收集2组患者的临床资料,包括患者性别、年龄、烧伤后入院时间、烧伤面积、烧伤深度;采用酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和实时荧光定量聚合酶链反应(qRT-PCR)法分别检测血清中白细胞介素(IL)-1β、IL-6、IL-8、IL-18、肿瘤坏死因子-α(TNF-α)水平及外周血单个核细胞中NLRP3炎性小体mRNA,Caspase-1 mRNA水平.数据行t检验、x2检验或Fisher确切概率法、多因素Logistic回归分析及Pearson相关性分析.结果 2组患者性别、年龄、烧伤后入院时间、烧伤面积、烧伤深度、IL-6比较,差异均无统计学意义(P值均大于0.05).预后良好组患者IL-1β、IL-18、NLRP3炎性小体mRNA、Caspase-1 mRNA表达水平分别为(37.28 ±6.54)pg/mL、(38.26 ±8.79)pg/mL、1.75 ±0.35,1.15 ±0.27,预后不良组患者IL-1β、IL-18、NLRP3炎性小体mRNA、Caspase-1 mRNA 表达水平分别为(49.46 ±8.87)pg/mL、(76.83 ± 10.58)pg/mL,2.23 ±0.41、1.94±0.36,2组比较差异均有统计学意义(t=5.11、13.10,4.17,8.13,P值均小于0.05);多因素Logistic回归分析显示,IL-1β、IL-18、NLRP3炎性小体mRNA、Caspase-1 mRNA表达水平是导致烧伤合吸入性损伤预后不良的独立危险因素(β=1.56、0.87、1.05、1.11,P值均小于0.05).经Pearson相关分析显示,IL-1β、IL-18、NLRP3炎性小体mRNA、Caspase-1 mRNA水平与烧伤合并吸入性损伤预后不良呈正相关(r=0.42、0.39、0.52、0.56,P值均小于0.05).结论 IL-1β、IL-18、NLRP3炎性小体、Caspase-1的水平异常升高可作为烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者预后不良的特征指标,可根据上述指标指导临床进行早期救治,有助于降低烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的病死率.
    • 王志勇; 冯世海; 范宝莉; 谢宇钢; 马伟; 贾享成; 耿辉
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨导向性限制性液体管理策略(RFMS)对严重烧伤合并重度吸入性损伤患者的影响. 方法 将笔者单位2014年12月-2017年12月收治的16例符合入选标准且行RFMS的严重烧伤合并重度吸入性损伤患者作为导向治疗组;将笔者单位2012年12月-2017年12月收治的34例符合入选标准但未行RFMS的严重烧伤合并重度吸入性损伤患者作为常规治疗组,回顾性分析2组患者的病历资料.伤后2d内,导向治疗组采用脉搏轮廓心排血量监测技术监测平均动脉压(MAP)、中心静脉压(CVP)、血管外肺水指数(ELWI)、全心舒张末期容积指数、肺血管通透性指数,常规治疗组患者采用常规方法监测MAP、CVP.伤后3~7d,2组患者均按笔者单位常规方法进行补液治疗,维持血流动力学稳定,导向治疗组患者另以ELWI≤7 mL· kg-1·m-2为液体治疗导向指标实施限制性液体管理策略(RFMS).伤后3~7d,记录2组患者24 h总入量、总出量、总入出量差,血乳酸值及氧合指数;统计伤后3~7d、伤后8~28 d急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的发生情况及伤后28 d内机械通气时间、病死情况.对数据行x2检验、t检验及重复测量方差分析. 结果 伤后3、4、5、6、7d,导向治疗组患者的24 h总入量与常规治疗组相近(t=-0.835、-1.618、-2.463、-1.244、-2.552,P>0.05).伤后3d,2组患者24 h总出量、总入出量差相近(t=0.931、-2.274,P >0.05).伤后4、5、6、7d,导向治疗组患者24 h总出量明显高于常规治疗组(t=2.645、2.352、1.847、1.152,P<0.05).伤后4、5、6、7d,导向治疗组患者24 h总入出量差为(2 928±768)、(2 028 ±1 001)、(2 186 ±815)、(2 071 ±963)mL,明显低于常规治疗组(4 455±960)、(3 434±819)、(3 233±1 022)、(3453±829)mL,t=-4.331、-3.882、-3.211、-4.024,P<0.05.伤后3、4、5、6、7d,导向治疗组患者血乳酸值与常规治疗组相近(t=0.847、1.221、0.994、1.873、1.948,P>0.05).伤后3、4d,导向治疗组患者氧合指数为(298±78)、(324±85)mmHg(1 mmHg =0.133 kPa),与常规治疗组的(270±110)、(291±90) mmHg相近(t=1.574、2.011,P>0.05).伤后5、6、7d,导向治疗组患者氧合指数为(372±88)、(369±65)、(377±39) mmHg,明显高于常规治疗组的(302±103)、(313±89)、(336±78)mmHg,t=3.657、3.223、2.441,P<0.05.伤后3~7d,导向治疗组发生ARDS的患者略少于常规治疗组,但组间比较,差异无统计学意义(x2=0.105,P>0.05);伤后8~28 d,导向治疗组发生ARDS的患者明显少于常规治疗组(x2=0.827,P<0.05).导向治疗组患者伤后28 d内机械通气时间明显短于常规治疗组(t=-2.895,P<0.05).导向治疗组伤后28 d内死亡患者少于常规治疗组,但组间比较,差异无统计学意义(x 2=0.002,P>0.05). 结论 在血流动力学稳定的条件下,伤后3~7d实施以ELWI≤7 mL· kg-1·m-2为导向指标的RFMS,能有效降低严重烧伤合并重度吸入性损伤患者后期ARDS的发生率,并缩短机械通气时间.%Objective To explore the influence of directed restrictive fluid management strategy (RFMS) on patients with serious burns complicated by severe inhalation injury.Methods Sixteen patients with serious burns complicated by severe inhalation injury hospitalized in our department from December 2014 to December 2017,meeting the inclusion criteria and treated with RFMS,were enrolled in directed treatment group.Thirty-four patients with serious burns complicated by severe inhalation injury hospitalized in our department from December 2012 to December 2017,meeting the inclusion criteria and without RFMS,were enrolled in routine treatment group.Medical records of patients in 2 groups were retrospectively analyzed.Within post injury day 2,mean arterial pressure (MAP),central venous pressure (CVP),extravascular lung water index (ELWI),global end-diastolic volume index,and pulmonary vascular permeability index of patients in directed treatment group were monitored by pulse contour cardiac output monitoring technology,while MAP and CVP of patients in routine treatment group were monitored by routine method.On post injury day 3 to 7,patients in 2 groups were treated with routine fluid supplement therapy of our Department to maintain hemodynamic stability,and patients in directed treatment group were treated according to RFMS directed with goal of ELWI≤7 mL · kg-1 · m-2.On post injury day 3 to 7,total fluid intake,total fluid output,and total fluid difference between fluid intake and output within 24 h,value of blood lactic acid,and oxygenation index of patients in 2 groups were recorded.Occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) on post injury day 3 to 7 and 8 to 28,mechanical ventilation time within post injury day 28,and occurrence of death of patients in 2 groups were counted.Data were processed with chi-square test,t test,and analysis of variance for repeated measurement.Results The total fluid intakes within 24 h of patients in directed treatment group were close to those in routine treatment group on post injury day 3,4,5,6,7 (t =-0.835,-1.618,-2.463,-1.244,-2.552,P >0.05).The total fluid outputs and total fluid differences between fluid intake and output within 24 h of patients in 2 groups on post injury day 3 were close (t =0.931,-2.274,P >0.05).The total fluid outputs within 24 h of patients in directed treatment group were significantly higher than those in routine treatment group on post injury day 4,5,6,7 (t =2.645,2.352,1.847,1.152,P < 0.05).The total fluid differences between fluid intake and output within 24 h of patients in directed treatment group were (2 928 ±768),(2 028 ± 1 001),(2 186 ±815),and (2 071 ±963) mL,significantly lower than (4 455 ±960),(3 434 ±819),(3 233 ± 1 022),and (3 453 ±829) mL in routine treatment group (t =-4.331,-3.882,-3.211,-4.024,P <0.05).The values of blood lactic acid of patients in directed treatment group and routine treatment group on post injury day 3,4,5,6,7 were close (t =0.847,1.221,0.994,1.873,1.948,P >0.05).The oxygenation indexes of patients in directed treatment group on post injury day 3 and 4 were (298 ± 78) and (324±85) mmHg (1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),which were close to (270±110) and (291 ±90) mmHg in routine treatment group (t =-1.574,2.011,P > 0.05).The oxygenation indexes of patients in directed treatment group on post injury day 5,6,7 were (372 ±88),(369 ±65),and (377 ±39) mmHg,significantly higher than (302 ± 103),(313 ± 89),and (336 ±78) mmHg in routine treatment group (t =3.657,3.223,2.441,P <0.05).On post injury day3,4,5,6,7,patients with ARDS in directed treatment group were less than those in routine treatment group,but with no significantly statistical difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.105,P > 0.05).On post injury day 8 to 28,patients with ARDS in directed treatment group were significantly less than those in routine treatment group (x2 =0.827,P < 0.05).The mechanical ventilation time within post injury day 28 of patients in directed treatment group was apparently shorter than that in routine treatment group (t =-2.895,P < 0.05).Death of patients in directed treatment group within post injury day 28 was less than that in routine treatment group,but with no significantly statistical difference between the 2 groups (x2 =0.002,P > 0.05).Conclusions Under the circumstance of hemodynamics stability,RFMS directed with goal of ELWI ≤7 mL · kg-1 · m-2 on post injury day 3 to 7 is an useful strategy,which can reduce occurrence rate of ADRS and shorten mechanical ventilation time of patients with serious burns complicated by severe inhalation injury at late stage of burns.
    • 王欣; 张雪宁; 吴梦琳; 贾俐聪; 谢莉娜; 孟钺; 冯世海; 马伟
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨特重度烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者支气管壁厚度(BWT)动态变化趋势,并确定BWT对患者预后诊断的意义. 方法 2016年7-11月,南开大学附属医院(天津市第四医院)重症烧伤科收治43例符合入选标准的特重度烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者,将其根据入院14d内预后情况分为存活组27例和死亡组16例.所有患者均在入院时完成纤维支气管镜检查,依据简明损伤定级行吸入性损伤评级.分别于入院时及入院24 h、3d、7d、14d对2组患者行胸部高分辨率CT检查,测量右肺上叶支气管主干开口处的BWT.绘制43例患者入院时吸入性损伤评级及入院时BWT的受试者工作特征曲线,评估其对死亡的预测效果.对数据行x 2检验、独立样本t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验、重复测量方差分析、LSD-t检验. 结果 (1)存活组中吸入性损伤评级0、1、2、3、4级患者数分别为0、19、6、2、0例,死亡组中分别为0、2、7、7、0例,2组差异明显(Z=-3.79,P<0.01).(2)死亡组患者入院时及入院24 h、3d、7d、14 d的BWT分别为(2.72±0.26)、(3.18 ±0.22)、(2.98±0.18)、(2.29±0.17)、(1.45±0.21)mrn,明显大于存活组的(2.24±0.15)、(2.49±0.15)、(1.51±0.17)、(1.04±0.16)、(1.01±0.13)mm(t=7.55、12.14、27.11、19.99、7.11,P<0.01).存活组、死亡组患者入院24 h、3d、7d、14 d的BWT均与对应组内入院时有明显差异(t=5.97、16.63、28.21、38.57,5.34、3.31、4.39、6.48,P<0.01),入院3、7、14d的BWT均较对应组内入院24 h减小(t=22.27、34.02、45.03,2.77、10.53、10.59,P<0.01),入院7、14 d的BWT均较对应组内入院3d减小(t=10.49、18.26,9.57、11.44,P<0.01),入院14d的BWT均较对应组内入院7d减小(t=6.97、6.15,P<0.01).(3)预测43例患者死亡的入院时吸入性损伤评级、入院时BWT的受试者工作特征曲线下总面积分别为0.880、0.956(95%置信区间分别为0.768 ~ 0.991、0.882 ~1.000,P<0.05),入院时吸入性损伤评级、入院时BWT的最佳阈值分别为1.5级、2.75 mm,其对死亡预测的敏感度分别为87.50%、83.33%,特异度分别为77.78%、96.00%. 结论 存活和死亡的特重度烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者伤后BWT均明显增大,而存活患者的BWT恢复至正常水平较快.BWT可用于特重度烧伤伴吸入性损伤患者的吸入性损伤严重程度评估及死亡预测.%Objective To explore the dynamic variation trend of bronchial wall thickness (BWT)in severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury,and to determine the value of BWT to prognosis of patients.Methods Forty-three severely burned patients with inhalation injury hospitalized in Intensive Burn Department of the Affiliated Hospital of Nankai University (Tianjin No.4 Hospital) from July to November 2016,conforming to the study criteria,were divided into survival group (n =27) and death group (n =16) according to the prognosis of patients within 14 days after admission.All patients underwent fiberoptic bronchoscopy and inhalation injury rating based on abbreviated injury scale at admission.High resolution CT examination was performed in patients of two groups at admission and 24 h post admission,3,7,and 14 d post admission to measure the BWT of right superior lobar bronchus trunk opening.Receiver operating characteristic curves of rating of inhalation damage at admission and BWT at admission were drawn to evaluate the predictive value for death of 43 patients.Data were processed with chi-square test,independent sample t test,Wilcoxon rank sum test,analysis of variance for repeated measurement and least-significant difference-t test.Results (1) The numbers of patients rated as 0,1,2,3,and 4 grade for inhalation injury in survival group and death group were 0,19,6,2,and 0,and 0,2,7,7,and 0,respectively.There were statistically significant differences between the two groups (Z =-3.79,P < 0.01).(2) BWT of patients in death group at admission and 24 h post admission,3,7,and 14 d post admission was respectively (2.72 ±0.26),(3.18 ±0.22),(2.98 ±0.18),(2.29 ±0.17),and (1.45 ±0.21) mm,which was significantly larger than (2.24 ±0.15),(2.49 ±0.15),(1.51 ±0.17),(1.04 ±0.16),and (1.01±0.13) mm in survival group (t =7.55,12.14,27.11,19.99,7.11,P <0.01).BWT of patients in survival group and death group at 24 h post admission,3,7,and 14 d post admission showed statistically significant difference when compared with that at admission within the corresponding group (t =5.97,16.63,28.21,38.57,5.34,3.31,4.39,6.48,P <0.01).BWT of patients in survival group and death group on 3,7,and 14 d post admission was significantly smaller than that at 24 h post admission within the corresponding group (t =22.27,34.02,45.03,2.77,10.53,10.59,P <0.01).BWT of patients in survival group and death group on 7 and 14 d post admission was significantly smaller than that on 3 d post admission within the corresponding group (t =10.49,18.26,9.57,11.44,P <0.01).BWT of patients in survival group and death group on 14 d post admission was significantly smaller than that on 7 d post admission within the corresponding group (t =6.97,6.15,P < 0.01).(3) The total areas under ROC curves of inhalation injury rating at admission and BWT at admission for predicting death of 43 patients were 0.880 and 0.956,respectively (with 95% confidence intervals 0.768-0.991,0.882-1.000,P < 0.05).Grade 1.5 and 2.75 mm were respectively chosen as the optimal threshold values of inhalation injury rating at admission and BWT at admission,with sensitivity of 87.50%,83.33% and specificity of 77.78%,96.00%,respectively.Conclusions The BWT of survived and dead patients with severe burn and inhalation injury increases significantly post burn,while the BWT of survived patients restores to normal level faster.BWT can be used to assess the severity of inhalation injury and to predict death in severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury.
    • 孙丹; 赵朋; 倪佳莹; 孙婧婧; 任颖炜; 王芳; 朱利红
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨并分析气道管理小组在群体严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者救治中的作用.方法 对2012年1月-2014年8月,笔者单位收治的符合入选标准的58例严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的病历资料进行回顾性分析.根据是否由气道管理小组执行气道护理,将2012年1月-2014年7月收治的27例患者纳入对照组,2014年8月2日收治的昆山工厂铝粉尘爆炸事故中烧伤的31例患者纳入观察组.对照组患者由责任护士进行常规气道护理;观察组患者接受气道管理小组的气道集中专项护理,具体措施包括对患者气道进行全面评估、精细化气道护理、机械通气的集中管理.比较2组患者伤后第1、7、14天动脉血气分析指标和氧合指数,监测并记录2组患者伤后1、2、3周痰液黏稠度、呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)发生率及机械通气时间,比较2组患者的救治成功率.对数据行重复测量方差分析、t检验和Bonferroni校正、x 2检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验.结果 (1)2组患者伤后第1天的pH值、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)、氧合指数比较,差异无统计学意义(t=0.595、-0.166、1.518、-0.828、0.458,P>0.05).观察组患者伤后第7、14天pH值分别为7.327±0.050、7.367±0.043,明显优于对照组的7.304±0.021、7.390±0.029(t=-2.385、2.391,P<0.05);PaO2分别为(95.1±6.7)、(106.3±7.8)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),明显高于对照组的(91.6±5.7)、(102.0±8.3) mmHg(t=-2.109、-2.059,P<0.05);PaCO2分别为(41±4)、(40±4) mmHg,低于对照组的(43±5)、(43±4)mmHg(t=2.220、2.304,P<0.05);SaO2分别为0.95±0.04、0.96±0.04,明显高于对照组的0.93土0.05、0.94±0.05(t=-2.201、-2.016,P<0.05);氧合指数分别为(286土18)、(329±20) mmHg,明显高于对照组的(277±14)、(306±58)mmHg(t=-2.263、-2.022,P<0.05).(2)观察组患者伤后第1、2、3周痰液黏稠度优于对照组(Z=-2.096、-2.076、-2.033,P<0.05).(3)观察组患者VAP发生率低于对照组,机械通气时间短于对照组(x2 =4.244,t=2.425,P<0.05).(4)观察组患者救治成功率显著高于对照组(x2 =4.244,P<0.05).结论 气道管理小组的专项集中护理可有效改善严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的氧合状态和痰液黏稠度,减少VAP的发生,缩短机械通气时间,有利于群体严重烧伤合并吸入性损伤患者的救治.%Objective To explore and analyze the effects of airway management team (AMT) in the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury.Methods The clinical data of 58 severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury hospitalized in our unit from January 2012 to August 2014,conforming to the inclusion criteria,were retrospectively analyzed.According to whether airway management was implemented by AMT or not,patients hospitalized from January 2012 to July 2014 were divided into control group (n =27),while patients in Kunshan factory aluminum dust explosion accident hospitalized on 2nd August 2014 were divided into observation group (n =31).Patients in control group received regular airway nursing carried out by nurses on duty,while patients in observation group received specialized airway concentration nursing implemented by AMT.The concrete implementation included overall assessment of patients' airway,elaborate airway care,and controlled management of mechanical ventilation.Arterial blood gas indexes and oxygenation index of patients in the two groups on post injury day (PID) 1,7,and 14 were compared.Sputum viscosity,ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) occurrence rate,and ventilation time of patients in the two groups in post injury week(s) 1,2,and 3 after admission were monitored and recorded.Survival rates of patients in the two groups were compared.Data were processed with analysis of variance for repeated measurement,t test and Bonferroni correction,chi-square test,and Wilcoxon rank sum test.Results (1) There were no statistically significant differences in pH value,arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2),arterial partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2),arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2),and oxygenation index of patients in the two groups on PID 1 (t =0.595,-0.166,1.518,-0.828,0.458,P >0.05).The pH values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were 7.327 ± 0.050 and 7.367 ± 0.043,respectively,significantly better than those in control group (7.304 ± 0.021 and 7.390 ±0.029,respectively,t =-2.385,2.391,P <0.05).The PaO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (95.1 ± 6.7) and (106.3 ± 7.8) mmHg (1 mmHg =0.133 kPa),respectively,significantly higher than those in control group [(91.6 ± 5.7) and (102.0 ± 8.3) mmHg,respectively,t =-2.109,-2.059,P < O.05].The PaCO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (41 ±4) and (40 ±4) mmHg,respectively,significantly lower than those in control group [(43±5) and (43 ±4) mmHg,respectively,t =2.220,2.304,P <0.05].TheSaO2 values of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were 0.95 ± 0.04 and 0.96 ± 0.04,respectively,significantly higher than those in control group (0.93 ±0.05 and 0.94±0.05,respectively,t =-2.201,-2.016,P <0.05).The oxygenation indexes of patients in observation group on PID 7 and 14 were (286 ± 18) and (329 ± 20) mmHg,significantly higher than those in control group [(277 ± 14) and (306 ± 58) mmHg,respectively,t =-2.263,-2.022,P < 0.05].(2) Sputum viscosity of patients in observation group in post injury week(s) 1,2,and3 were superior to that in control group (Z =-2.096,-2.076,-2.033,P < 0.05).(3) VAP occurrence rate of patients in observation group was lower than that in control group,and time of mechanical ventilation of patients in observation group was shorter than that in control group (x 2 =4.244,t =2.425,P < 0.05).(4) Survival rate of patients in observation group was higher than that in control group (x 2 =4.244,P < 0.05).Conclusions The special intensive care of airway management by AMT can effectively improve the oxygenation status of severely burned patients combined with inhalation injury,alleviate the sputum viscosity,reduce the occurrence of VAP,and shorten the time of mechanical ventilation,thus benefits the treatment of severely mass burn patients combined with inhalation injury.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号