您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 两孔法

两孔法

两孔法的相关文献在1996年到2022年内共计111篇,主要集中在外科学、内科学、肿瘤学 等领域,其中期刊论文108篇、会议论文2篇、专利文献372640篇;相关期刊67种,包括中国内镜杂志、临床外科杂志、腹腔镜外科杂志等; 相关会议2种,包括2014年台丽温三地外科学术研讨会、第四届中国武汉国际微创外科学术研讨会等;两孔法的相关文献由346位作者贡献,包括于霓、杨勇、王海峰等。

两孔法—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:108 占比:0.03%

会议论文>

论文:2 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:372640 占比:99.97%

总计:372750篇

两孔法—发文趋势图

两孔法

-研究学者

  • 于霓
  • 杨勇
  • 王海峰
  • 田明国
  • 金嵩
  • 任红霞
  • 刘培军
  • 刘臻伟
  • 张旭华
  • 李继良
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 郑孝榕; 马玉滨; 燕速
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨两孔(SPOT)腹腔镜胃癌根治术的临床安全性及可行性。方法:回顾性收集2015年10月至2020年12月收治的400例行腹腔镜胃癌根治术患者的临床资料;将符合研究标准的237例患者纳入本研究,其中男178例,女59例。依据手术方式分为传统多孔手术组(n=121)与SPOT组(n=116)。比较两组围手术期各项临床资料、实验室指标及术后患者恢复情况、并发症发生情况。结果:两组患者性别、年龄、体重指数、肿瘤部位、肿瘤长短径、手术时间、pT分期、pN分期、pTNM分期、术后进食时间、术后住院时间、术后实验室检验指标、淋巴结获取总数、淋巴结阳性数、肿瘤切缘、吻合口漏发生率等差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05);而两组淋巴结清扫时间、消化道重建时间、术中出血量、术后下床时间、术后排气时间、引流管拔除时间、切口相关并发症及术后第1天、第3天、第5天疼痛评分差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:SPOT腹腔镜胃癌根治术是安全、可行的,在术后加速康复方面具有一定优势,是胃癌治疗的可选择术式之一。
    • 胡伟
    • 摘要: 目的 观察对比两孔法和三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗肺癌效果.方法 将本院确诊收治的84例肺癌患者作为本次研究对象,随机双盲法分为两组,对照组40例采用三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术,观察组44例采用两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术,观察对比两种手术方法围术期指标.结果 观察组手术出血量及术后住院时间、不同时间点的VAS评分少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),但两组患者的手术时间、胸管留置时间及术后前3 d总引流量、并发症、淋巴结清扫数量及站数、N2淋巴结清扫数量以及站数差异无统计学意义.结论 相较于三孔法,两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术,应用效果更为安全可靠.
    • 郝延红; 席俊峰; 李婉宁
    • 摘要: Objective:To explore the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery ( video-assisted thoracic, surgery, VATS) under the influence of the two hole type spell bullae of lung resection and VAS score efficacy. Methods:From May 2014 to May 2016, 98 patients with bullous pulmonary bullae were operated under VATS. Under the advice of the physician, the patients were voluntarily divided into the observation group (49 cases) and the control group ( 49 cases) . The patients in the observation group were excised by two - hole method, and the traditional traditional three-hole resection was performed in the control group. The perioper-ative time, intraoperative blood loss, incision length, extubation time and hospitalization time, pulmonary function, VAS score and VRS score, postoperative complications, recurrence of one year and incidence of one year pneumothorax in two groups were compared. Results:There was no statistical difference in operative time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups. The length of incision, extubation time and hospitaliza-tion time in the observation group were significantly less than those in the control group. The difference of lung function between the two groups before and after treatment was not statistically significant. Before treatment, there was no significant difference in the VAS score and VRS score between the two groups. After treatment, the VAS score and VRS score of the two groups decreased significantly, and the decrease in the observation group was significantly better than that in the control group ( P 0.05) . Conclusion:The two hole method and three type of spell bullae of lung resection in pa-tients with symptoms under VATS are alleviated effectively the safety, and the two hole spell has less pain, less trauma, postoperative recovery and good characteristics such as fast, and it is worthy of reference.%目的:研究电视辅助胸腔镜手术(video-assisted thoracic surgery,VATS)下两孔法术式对肺大疱切除的疗效及VAS评分的影响.方法:从2014年5月至2016年5月,我院共有98例肺大疱患者接受VATS下手术切除术.以患者自愿将其分成观察组(49例)和对照组(49例).观察组患者采用两孔法切除术;对照组患者传统传统三孔法切除术;对比两组围术期手术时间、术中出血量、切口长度、拔管时间及住院时间,肺功能,VAS评分及VRS评分,术后并发症、一年复发及一年气胸发生情况.结果:两组患者手术时间及术中出血量差异无统计学意义,手术切口长度、拔管时间及住院时间观察组均少于对照组;治疗前后两组患者肺功能对比,差异均无统计学意义;治疗前两组患者VAS评分及VRS评分均差异无统计学意义,治疗后两组患者VAS评分及VRS评分均下降,且观察组下降幅度均优于对照组(均P0.05).结论:VATS下两孔法与三孔法术式对肺大疱切除后,患者症状均得到安全有效的缓解,且两孔法术式具有疼痛少、创伤小、术后恢复良好且快等特点,值得临床借鉴.
    • 江贤亮; 徐美清; 徐世斌
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术的临床效果. 方法 回顾分析我科2014年10月~2015年12月完成的72例两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术(DP组),按病灶所在肺叶位置及良恶性质配对选择同期我院完成的72例三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术作为对照(TP组),比较2组手术时间、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数量、胸腔引流管留置时间、术后住院时间、术后前3 d疼痛程度总分(VAS疼痛评分法)、术后并发症,电话或门诊随访. 结果 2组均无手术死亡.DP与TP组术中出血量[(107.9 ±56.6)ml vs.(95.0 ±46.8)ml,t=1.490,P=0.138]、淋巴结清扫数量[(13.9 ±2.7)枚 vs.(14.5 ±2.6)枚,t=1.358,P=0.177]和术后并发症发生率[11.1%(8/72)vs.9.7%(7/72),χ2=0.074,P=0.785]无统计学差异.DP组手术时间(153.6 ±22.6)min明显长于TP组(143.6 ±25.8)min(t=2.474,P=0.015),胸腔引流管留置时间(5.2 ±1.7)d 明显短于TP组(6.4 ±1.1)d(t=5.029,P=0.000),术后住院时间(6.1 ±1.6)d明显短于TP组(7.6 ±1.2)d(t=6.364,P=0.000),术后前3 d疼痛VAS总分(12.3 ±1.9)分明显低于 TP组(14.4 ±1.8)分(t=6.808,P=0.000).2组术后随访6~20个月,均无并发症和复发. 结论 两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术安全可行,对于有选择的病例可能是更好的手术方法.%Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 72 patients who underwent double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(DP group)from October 2014 to December 2015 in our hospital.A paired comparison was made with 72 patients who had the same lesion location and the nature(benign or malignant)and underwent three-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy(TP group)in the same period.The clinical outcomes included operation time, intraoperative blood loss,the number of lymph node, the chest tube time,postoperative hospital stay, incision pain VAS scores within three days and complications.Postoperative follow-ups were taken with telephone calls or out-patient reviews. Results No operative morality occurred in both groups.There were no statistical significances between the DP Group and the TP Group in intraoperative blood loss[(107.9 ±56.6)ml vs.(95.0 ± 46.8)ml,t=1.490,P=0.138],the number of lymph node(13.9 ±2.7 vs.14.5 ±2.6,t=1.358,P=0.177)and complication rate[11.1%(8/72)vs.9.7%(7/72),χ2=0.074,P=0.785].The DP group had significant longer operation time[(153.6 ± 22.6)min vs.(143.6 ±25.8)min, t=2.474, P=0.015], shorter chest tube time[(5.2 ±1.7)d vs.(6.4 ±1.1)d, t=5.029,P=0.000],shorter postoperative hospital stay[(6.1 ±1.6)d vs.7.6 ±1.2, t=6.364, P=0.000], and lower incision pain VAS scores within three days[(12.3 ±1.9)points vs.(14.4 ±1.8)points, t=6.808, P=0.000]as compared to the TP group.No short-term complication was noticed in both groups during a follow-up time ranged from 6 to 20 months. Conclusions Double-port video-assisted thoracoscopic lobectomy is safe and feasible.It is a preferred surgical mode for selected cases.
    • 马春涛; 张海玲; 孔欢; 荊彦明
    • 摘要: 目的 评价两孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎的临床疗效.方法 择取2017年9月~2018年4月本院诊治的116例阑尾炎患者,以随机数的方式分为传统组(n=58)、腹腔镜组(n=58).即传统组为传统开腹手术,腹腔镜组为两孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术,对比各组总有效率、围术期指标.结果 腹腔镜组总有效率为96.55%,传统组则为86.21%,各数据对比有意义(P<0.05).传统组手术时间、术中出血量、下床活动时间、肠鸣音消失时间、住院时间均较差于腹腔镜组,各数据对比有意义(P<0.05).结论 针对阑尾炎患者而言,两孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术能够显著提高患者总有效率,还可缩短手术时间、住院时间、下床活动时间、肠鸣音消失时间,减少术中出血量,存在推广价值.
    • 孔新亮; 王强; 申玉芳; 许崇良; 桑遥彩
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨悬吊式经脐两孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术的安全性与可行性.方法:将2014年9月至2017年3月收治的258例急性单纯性阑尾炎及慢性阑尾炎患者随机分为经脐组(n=130)与三孔组(n=128).对比分析两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后排气时间、并发症发生率、术后腹部切口满意度、术后疼痛、住院时间.结果:两组术中出血量[(34.19±14.22) ml vs.(32.71±13.02) ml]、住院时间[(2.77±0.71) d vs.(2.83±0.76) d]、并发症发生率(0.77% vs.1.56%)差异无统计学意义;经脐组术后胃肠功能恢复较三孔组快[(12.48±5.40) h vs.(17.71±9.99) h,P<0.05],术后疼痛评分[(2.30±1.05)分vs.(3.58±1.28)分]、切口满意度评分[(4.46±0.59)分vs.(3.87±0.70)分]优于三孔组;手术时间经脐组长于三孔组[(47.67±8.04) min vs.(23.20±5.18) min,P<0.05].术后随访1~32个月,两组均无严重并发症发生.结论:悬吊式经脐两孔法腹腔镜阑尾切除术安全、可行,术后患者胃肠功能恢复快,疼痛反应轻,腹部切口瘢痕少且隐蔽.%Objective:To investigate the safety and feasibility of transumbilical double-port suspended laparoscopic appendectomy.Methods:Two hundred and fifty-eight patients with acute simple or chronic appendicitis between Sep.2014 and Mar.2017 were randomly divided into two groups:transumbilical group (130 cases) and three-port group (128 cases).The operation time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative exhaust time,complication incidence,postoperative abdominal incision satisfaction,postoperative pain and hospitalization time were compared between the two groups.Results:There was no significant difference in intraoperative blood loss [(34.19±14.22) ml vs.(32.71±13.02) ml],hospitalization time [(2.77±0.71) d vs.(2.83±0.76) d] or complication incidence (0.77% vs.1.56%) between the two groups.The transumbilical group had better postoperative gastrointestinal function recovery [(12.48±5.40) h vs.(17.71±9.99) h,P<0.05],postoperative pain score [(2.30±1.05) vs.(3.58±1.28)] and postoperative abdominal incision satisfaction [(4.46±0.59) vs.(3.87±0.70)] compared with the three-port group.The operation time of transumbilical group was longer than that of the three-port group [(47.67±8.04) min vs.(23.20±5.18) min,P<0.05].Patients were followed up for 1-32 months,and there was no serious complication in either group.Conclusions:Transumbilical double-port suspended laparoscopic appendectomy is as safe and feasible as the traditional laparoscopic appendectomy,and is associated with quick postoperative gastrointestinal recovery,few pain,small and hidden abdominal scar.
    • 王冬冬; 许咏冬; 李智成; 熊健; 王长涛
    • 摘要: 目的 对比观察两孔法、三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗肺癌的效果.方法 将97例肺癌患者随机分为观察组45例和对照组52例,观察组采用两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗,对照组采用三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗,比较两组手术时间、术后住院时间、胸管留置时间、术中出血量、术后前3天引流总量、并发症,以及术中清扫淋巴结数量和站数、N2淋巴结清扫数量和站数,术后第3天、1个月、6个月行视觉模拟疼痛评分(VAS).结果 两组手术时间、胸管留置时间、术后前3天引流总量及术后并发症比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05);与对照组比较,观察组术中出血量少、术后住院时间短(P均<0.05).两组淋巴结清扫数量、站数及N2淋巴结清扫数量、站数比较,差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05).与对照组比较,观察组术后第3天、1个月及6个月VAS降低(P均<0.05).结论 与三孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术相比,两孔法胸腔镜肺叶切除术联合系统性淋巴结清扫术治疗肺癌手术出血量少、术后住院时间短且术后疼痛程度轻.
    • 张正旭; 候延君; 宋传健; 张毅奎
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨两孔法腹腔镜胆囊切除术牵拉钩的应用.方法 回顾分析2013年10月至2016年11月采用自制的1.2 mm胆囊牵拉钩辅助完成46例两孔法LC,结果 46例手术均顺利完成,无一例中转常规腹腔镜手术或开腹手术.结论 腹腔镜胆囊切除术已成为治疗胆囊良性疾病的金标准.术者不仅应以更加实用、微创的方式治疗疾病,更要满足患者的心理需求,尽量避免或减少患者的心理创伤.
    • 罗保华; 肖运政; 边瑜健
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨两孔法腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术临床效果.方法 选取2014-03-2017-02间深圳市西丽人民医院收治的原发性精索静脉曲张患者75例作为本次研究对象,根据患者就诊号的单双号将所有患者分为观察组和对照组,38例单号为观察组,37例双号为对照组,所有患者均采用硬膜外阻滞麻醉或全麻后进行手术,观察组患者采用两孔法腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术进行治疗,对照组患者采用传统腹腔镜手术进行治疗,观察两组患者手术时间、住院时间及并发症情况.结果 经治疗后两组患者的临床症状均有显著改善,观察组患者单侧手术时间、双侧手术时间、住院时间某内容与对照组比较,观察组患者无1例患者有术后并发症,对照组3例患者出现鞘膜积液和1例患者阴囊水肿,观察组患者时间均显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义.结论 两孔法腹腔镜精索静脉高位结扎术治疗精索静脉曲张的手术时间、住院时间及术后并发症发生率均较少,临床应用前景广阔.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号