您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 术后放射治疗

术后放射治疗

术后放射治疗的相关文献在1989年到2022年内共计120篇,主要集中在肿瘤学、临床医学、外科学 等领域,其中期刊论文106篇、会议论文9篇、专利文献353781篇;相关期刊80种,包括中国医学物理学杂志、齐鲁护理杂志、癌症进展等; 相关会议8种,包括2015临床急重症经验交流高峰论坛、2014华东胸部肿瘤论坛暨第七届浙江省胸部肿瘤论坛、第三届北京三博国际神经科学论坛暨显微神经外科技术研讨会等;术后放射治疗的相关文献由357位作者贡献,包括王中和、余子豪、姜德福等。

术后放射治疗—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:106 占比:0.03%

会议论文>

论文:9 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:353781 占比:99.97%

总计:353896篇

术后放射治疗—发文趋势图

术后放射治疗

-研究学者

  • 王中和
  • 余子豪
  • 姜德福
  • 崔贝
  • 张玉霞
  • 李济培
  • 李高峰
  • 杨宗贻
  • 梁平
  • 白红升
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 周润蕾; 方立纯; 程代薇
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨不同放射治疗方案对瘢痕疙瘩术后治疗的有效率、复发率及并发症等的影响.方法 检索自1990年1月至2018年8月瘢痕疙瘩术后联合放射治疗的相关文献,数据库包括PubMed、EMbase、Cochrane library、CNKI、VIP(维普期刊)、万方医学网等,并提取相关试验数据,纳入Meta分析.结果 对瘢痕疙瘩术后放射治疗时机的研究共纳入10篇文献,根据术后放射治疗开始时间,分为术后72 h内与术后72 h后放射治疗组,两组有效率比较,其差异具有统计学意义(P< 0.000 01),OR=10.80 [5.92,19.69];瘢痕疙瘩术后放射治疗分割剂量纳入7篇文献,根据不同分割剂量分为两组,即小分割剂量组(单次放射治疗剂量≤2 Gy)与大分割剂量组(单次放射剂量>2 Gy),两组有效率比较,其差异具有统计学意义(P< 0.000 01),OR=0.25 [0.16,0.38];大分割剂量组与小分割剂量组并发症发生率具有统计学意义(P< 0.000 01),OR=3.73 [2.44,5.71];两组局部红斑发生率比较,无统计学意义(P>0.05);局部色素沉着发生率比较,具有统计学意义(P<0.05),OR=2.36 [1.08,5.19].结论 瘢痕疙瘩切除术后72 h内开始放射治疗,其效果优于72 h后开始放射治疗;大分割剂量组治疗效果优于小分割剂量组.大分割剂量组治疗后,并发症发生率总体高于小分割剂量组,其中局部红斑发生率无明显差异.
    • 秦尚彬; 高献书; 李洪振; 李晓颖; 亓昕; 任雪盈
    • 摘要: 目的 评价前列腺癌术后中等分割照射的急性不良反应.方法 选取2017年2月至8月,本院20例前列腺癌术后患者入组.中等分割处方剂量为盆腔45 Gy/25次,1.8 Gy/次;前列腺床62.75 Gy/25次,2.51 Gy/次.不良反应的评价采用北美放射肿瘤协作组(RTOG)急性不良反应评价标准和常见不良事件评价标准(CTCAE) 4.0.结果 中位随访时间7.5个月.1例(5%)患者出现了2级急性胃肠反应;2例(10%)患者出现了2级急性泌尿反应.2例(10%)患者放射治疗期间出现了2级尿失禁,放疗后1个月恢复至0级或1级.结论 与既往常规分割照射文献相比,前列腺癌术后中等分割照射模式(2.51 Gy/次×25次)没有明显增加患者急性胃肠、泌尿系统不良反应.近期随访结果显示,没有增加患者尿失禁风险.%Objective To assess the acute toxicity of a hypo-fractionated regimen of intensity-modulated radiotherapy to the prostatic bed after prostatectomy.Methods From February to August 2017,twenty cases with prostate adenocarcinoma after prostatectomy were recruited.The prescribed dose to the whole pelvis and the prostatic bed was 45 Gy delivered in 1.8 Gy per fraction and 62.75 Gy delivered in 2.51 Gy per fraction,respectively.Acute toxicity was recorded and graded according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) criteria and Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) 4.0.Results The median follow-up was 7.5 months.Grade 2 acute genitourinary and gastrointestinal toxicity was observed respectively in two cases (10%) and one (5%),respectively.Two cases (10%) complained of grade 2 urinary incontinence during radiation therapy,but recovered to grade 0 or grade 1 after the first month of follow-up.Conclusions After prostatectomy,moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy (2.51 Gy × 25) compared with conventional fractionated radiotherapy previously reported did not increase the risk of acute toxicity.The incidence of urinary incontinence did not increase during short-term of follow-up.
    • 李能平; 杨志雄
    • 摘要: 目的:分析Ⅲa期非小细胞肺癌术后辅助放疗开始时间与手术间隔的时间对患者远期生存的影响.方法:回顾性分析我院收治的42例Ⅲa期非小细胞肺癌术后放疗患者的临床资料,其中卡氏评分60~90分;男性22例,女性20例;年龄30~74岁,中位年龄55岁;鳞癌13例,腺癌23例,其它6例;切缘阳性17例,阴性25例;术后放疗开始时间与手术间隔的时间13~120天,放射治疗采用常规放疗或三维适形放疗,放疗剂量40~66 Gy,所有患者均行2~6疗程以铂类为主的双药联合化疗.结果:术后放疗开始时间与手术间隔时间长者(43~120天)5年生存率好于间隔时间短者(13~42天)(P=0.040),手术与术后放疗开始时间的间隔对手术切缘阳性者的5年生存率影响差异无统计学意义(P=0.067).结论:对Ⅲa期非小细胞肺癌患者,术后早放疗并不能提高患者的生存,若术后计划行放化疗,放疗在手术后1个半月后开始可能效果更好.
    • 戴红娅; 黄江华; 陈露; 钟良志; 周一兵
    • 摘要: 目的:研究RapidArc和IMRT技术在脑胶质瘤术后放疗中保护海马的剂量学比较.方法:选取22例脑胶质瘤术后行放疗患者,在其CT和MRI图像融合基础上勾画靶区和危及器官,分别设计IMRT和RapidArc计划,比较两种计划在计划靶区及危及器官的剂量学参数.结果:两种计划均能满足处方剂量要求.与IMRT技术相比,RapidArc技术靶区适形度指数更接近于1(P<0.05)、靶区剂量均匀性指数无显著差异;在脑干和海马保护上,RapidArc技术比IMRT技术有明显优势,特别是海马的Dmax和Dmean值均显示在RapidArc技术中低于IMRT技术(P<0.05).结论:RapidArc计划可以达到或优于IMRT技术的靶区剂量分布,能更好地降低海马的受照射量,且相对MU和治疗时间均有很大的优势,是脑胶质瘤术后海马保护放射治疗计划较好的选择.
    • 刘景文; 李先明
    • 摘要: 头颈部腺样囊性癌发病率较低,目前主要治疗手段为手术联合术后放射治疗,但对于术后放射治疗的必要性及选取何种放射治疗手段可以使患者获益最大的问题目前仍有广泛争议.本文综合各方面因素,考虑目前头颈部腺样囊性癌的术后放疗主要以常规光子放疗为主,中子放疗虽能提高局部控制率,但晚期毒性反应不可忽视,质子、碳离子放疗虽有其物理特点上的优势,但因病例数少,且其放疗机器价格昂贵等客观障碍,尚未收集足够数据证明其优势.
    • 张丝媛; 铁剑; 于会明; 张艺宝
    • 摘要: Objective To compare the survival effects between using electron beams (EB) and modulated X-ray beams (XB) for boosting irradiation in breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery and postoperative radiotherapy.Methods This study retrospectively included 485 breast cancer patients who underwent breast-conserving surgery at Beijing Cancer Hospital.All patients underwent either EB or XB for tumor bed boost irradiation (10-16 Gy/5-8 fractions) after whole-breast irradiation of 46-50 Gy/23-25 fractions.Results Median follow-up time for the cohort was 96.04 months.Statistically significant increase of local recurrence free Survival (LRFS) was observed in XB group than in EB group.The 5-year and 10-year LRFS was both 98.4% in XB group,as well as 94.2% and 93.2% in EB group,respectively (x2 =4.190,P < 0.05).But there was not statistically significant difference in 5-year and 10-year overall survival (OS) between XB group(96.7% and 95.8%) and EB group(94.9% and 89.4%),respectively (P > 0.05).The multivariate analysis showed that LRFS was significantly correlated with age≤40,positive pathological lymph nodes and positive expression of Her-2 receptor.But boost irradiation method was not independent prognostic factor for LRFS and OS (P > 0.05).Conclusions For cancer patients treated with breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast postoperative radiation followed by a boost irradiation to tumor bed,XB irradiation was superior to EB irradiation in term of LRFS,yet no difference of OS was observed in both groups.%目的 比较乳腺癌保乳手术后瘤床电子线二维补量和X射线三维调强补量方法对肿瘤局部控制率及患者生存的影响.方法 回顾性分析485例于北京肿瘤医院接受乳腺癌保乳手术的患者,术后全乳腺照射46 ~50 Gy/23 ~25次后,一组患者采用电子线技术,另一组采用X射线调强技术进行瘤床补量放疗,补量剂量均为10~16 Gy/5~8次.结果 全组患者的中位随访时间为96.04个月.X射线调强瘤床补量组的5年和10年无局部复发生存率(LRFS)均为98.4%,明显优于电子线补量组5年的94.2%和10年的93.2%(x2=4.190,P<0.05).但两组的总生存率(0S)间无明显差异,X射线组5年和10年的OS率分别为96.7%和95.8%,电子线组的分别为94.9%和89.4% (P >0.05).在多因素分析中,年龄≤40岁、腋窝淋巴结有转移及Her-2高表达是LRFS的独立预后因素,而放疗瘤床补量方式不是LRFS和OS的预后因素(P>0.05).结论 乳腺癌保乳手术后,X射线调强放疗较电子线二维放疗在瘤床补量治疗上有更好的肿瘤局部控制率,但对患者生存无明显影响.
    • 徐欣; 马秀梅; 周荻; 白永瑞
    • 摘要: 目的· 探讨局部晚期食管鳞癌术后患者放射治疗的预后因素,以及淋巴结转移状态对患者生存及治疗失败模式的影响.方法· 收集2006—2013年接受肿瘤根治术后放射治疗的121例局部晚期食管鳞癌患者资料,采用Kaplan-Meier法计算无病生存时间(DFS)和总生存时间(OS),分别利用log-rank法和Cox模型进行单因素和多因素预后分析,比较不同淋巴结转移状态患者OS及复发模式的差异.结果·121例患者的中位DFS为22.57个月,中位OS为32.90个月.多因素分析结果显示KPS评分、病变长度、阳性淋巴结比例(pLNR)是DFS和OS的独立预后因素.对于淋巴结阳性的患者,pLNR≤0.15和pLNR>0.15患者的中位OS分别为33.43和19.20个月(P=0.04);无淋巴结跳跃式转移(NSM)患者的中位OS优于有NSM患者,但差异无统计学意义;pLNR>0.15且有NSM患者的OS显著差于其他淋巴结阳性的患者(中位OS:14.33个月vs 32.50个月;P=0.02);pLNR较阳性淋巴结数对OS有更好的预测价值(AUC=0.673,P=0.04).治疗失败模式的分析结果显示:pLNR>0.15患者中远处转移较局部复发多见,而pLNR≤0.15患者中局部复发较远处转移多见.结论·淋巴结转移状态与食管癌术后患者放射治疗的预后相关.对于淋巴结阳性的患者,pLNR对OS有更好的预测价值;不同pLNR患者放射治疗后复发模式存在差异,高pLNR且有NSM患者的预后较差.%Objective · To explore the prognostic factors for postoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the effects of lymph nodes metastasis status on the survival of patients and failure modes of treatment. Methods · Data of 121 patients with locally advanced ESCC who underwent radical resection and postoperative radiotherapy from 2006 to 2013 were collected. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were performed to investigate prognostic factors with the log-rank test and the Cox regression model. The differences in OS and recurrence patterns between patients with different lymph node metastasis status were compared. Results · The median DFS of all patients was 22.57 months and median OS was 32.90 months.Multivariate analysis showed that KPS score, length of lesion, and positive lymph nodes ratio (pLNR) were independent prognostic factors for DFS and OS. For patients with positive lymph nodes, the median DFS of patients with pLNR ≤ 0.15 and pLNR>0.15 were 33.43 and 19.20 months (P=0.04).Patients without nodal skip metastasis (NSM) had better median OS than patients with NSM, but the difference was not statistically significant. OS was significantly worse in patients with pLNR>0.15 and NSM than in other patients with positive lymph nodes (median OS of 14.33 vs 32.50 months, P=0.02).pLNR had a better prognostic value for OS than the number of positive lymph nodes (AUC=0.673, P=0.04). Analysis of the failure patterns showed that more distant metastases were observed in patients with pLNR>0.15, while more local and regional recurrences were observed in patients with pLNR ≤ 0. 15. Conclusion · The status of lymph nodes metastasis is associated with the prognosis of postoperative radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced ESCC. pLNR has a better prognostic value for OS for patients with positive lymph nodes. The recurrence pattern varies in patients with different pLNR after postoperative radiotherapy. The patients with high pLNR and NSM have poor prognosis.
    • 侯鑫; 姚元虎
    • 摘要: 目的 通过分析54例侵袭性胸腺瘤患者的治疗结果,探讨影响患者预后的相关因素.方法 回顾性分析54例侵袭性胸腺瘤患者的临床及随访资料,其中男27例,女27例,中位年龄50岁.手术完整切除40例,部分切除14例.依照Masaoka分期,Ⅱ期患者23例,Ⅲ期患者21例,Ⅳ期患者10例.其中Ⅱ期患者术后未行辅助放疗或化疗,Ⅲ、Ⅳ期患者中行术后辅助放疗和(或)化疗21例,10例未行术后辅助放疗或化疗.对可能影响预后的因素,采用Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险模型分别进行单因素和多因素分析.结果 全组3年生存率、5年生存率为:88.9%,74.1%.单因素分析示Masaoka分期、手术切除完整性、术后是否行辅助放疗和(或)化疗对生存差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).多因素分析显示Masaoka分期、术后行辅助放疗和(或)化疗是独立预后因素(P<0.05).结论 手术切除完整性与侵袭性胸腺瘤患者的预后密切相关;Masaoka分期是影响预后的独立因素,术后辅助放疗和(或)化疗可以给患者带来显著的生存获益.
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号