首页> 外文OA文献 >The reading prism: questioning literary texts within a reading community to develop active independent readers
【2h】

The reading prism: questioning literary texts within a reading community to develop active independent readers

机译:阅读棱镜:在阅读社区内质疑文学文本,以培养积极的独立读者

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The introduction of a literature programme (emphasising the teaching of thinking skills) as part of the Israeli English curriculum, led to this qualitative action research case study. The rationale for this study was further strengthened by two concerns. First, self-proclaimed readers (readers who claim they read a lot) read literature superficially. Second, even when teachers enable richer discussions through open-ended questions and implied use of reading comprehension strategies (RCS), pupils do not appropriate these strategies for their own reading. The year-and-a-half long study was conducted with 53 pupils from two advanced classes in two secondary schools. It began by looking at whether self-proclaimed readers were aware of the RCS they use while reading and how this knowledge or lack of it influenced their reading. The findings revealed that pupils use RCS haphazardly due to lack of awareness of what they are doing or need to do while reading. Consequently, a reading strategy PaRDeS was designed and implemented with the idea that pupils would appropriate it.ududThe data analysed through constructive-interpretive-hermeneutic methods shows the effects on pupils' reading during and after the implementation of the PaRDeS reading strategy (a question generating strategy based on the Ministry's thinking skills). The study reveals how metacognitive discussions improved pupils' awareness of what they were doing and enhanced their use of PaRDeS. Furthermore, the study observes how the strategy can be improved by using it within a community of readers. Thus, pupils moved from the periphery of the classroom space to the centre as they appropriated the strategy and took control of their discussions and therefore their comprehension.ududThe study also reveals that using PaRDeS helps pupils understand that inference is central to constructing understanding of literary texts. In addition, the strategy causes pupils to view texts as multi-layered and enables them to read iteratively to create a global meaning that is greater than the sum of understanding of each part of the text. This synergy is further enhanced when pupils bring their questions to the community to analyse texts from different perspectives.ududSynergy led to the central finding of this study, an understanding of why PaRDeS may improve reading comprehension. The study concludes that a reading prism is created due to the PaRDeS question types, the scaffolding of the strategy and its utilisation in the community. This prism is constructed from six points: reader, text, author, contexts of knowledge and experience, teacher/facilitator and participants in a reading community. As the points of the reading prism interact, the hermeneutic space is established in which hermeneutic dialogue occurs. Close observation of what is happening within the hermeneutic space reveals that because of the interaction between the points, pupils use several reading styles iteratively and that these reading styles enhance thinking styles. Consequently, pupils co-created enriched textual interpretation, which also led to individual creative analysis through writing assignments.ududTo conclude, this study suggests that when an environment is created to implement and use PaRDeS, the resulting synergy between members of the learning community leads to enhanced thinking necessary for both enriched understanding of the text and the development of active independent readers.
机译:作为以色列英语课程的一部分,引入了文学课程(强调思维技能的教学),从而促成了这一定性的行动研究案例研究。两项关注进一步加强了这项研究的理由。首先,自吹自reader的读者(声称自己读了很多书的读者)表面地阅读了文学。其次,即使教师通过开放式问题和默示阅读理解策略(RCS)进行更丰富的讨论时,学生也不会将这些策略用于自己的阅读。这项为期一年半的研究是对来自两所中学的两个高级班的53名学生进行的。首先,我们着眼于自吹自reader的读者是否知道他们在阅读时使用的RCS,以及这种知识或缺乏知识如何影响他们的阅读。调查结果表明,由于学生在阅读时对自己正在做的事情或需要做的事情缺乏了解,因此他们随意使用RCS。因此,设计和实施一种阅读策略PaRDeS的目的是让学生适应。 ud ud通过建构-解释-解释学方法分析的数据显示,在实施PaRDeS阅读策略期间和之后,对学生阅读的影响(根据教育部的思维能力提出问题的策略)。这项研究揭示了元认知讨论如何提高学生对自己正在做的事情的认识并增强他们对PaRDeS的使用。此外,研究观察到如何通过在读者社区中使用该策略来改进该策略。因此,学生在采用策略并控制他们的讨论和理解力后,从教室空间的边缘移到了中心。 ud ud这项研究还表明,使用PaRDeS可以帮助学生理解推理对于构建理解力至关重要文学文本。另外,该策略使学生将文本视为多层,并使他们能够反复阅读以创建全局含义,该含义大于对文本各部分的理解总和。当学生向社区提出他们的问题以从不同角度分析文本时,这种协同作用会进一步增强。 ud ud协同作用是本研究的主要发现,这理解了PaRDeS为什么可以提高阅读理解力。研究得出的结论是,由于PaRDeS问题类型,策略的脚手架及其在社区中的利用,创建了一个阅读棱镜。这个棱镜由六个方面构成:读者,课文,作者,知识和经验的背景,老师/协助者和阅读社区的参与者。当阅读棱镜的各点相互作用时,就会建立解释空间,在该空间中发生解释性对话。对诠释空间内正在发生的事情的密切观察表明,由于各点之间的相互作用,学生反复使用了几种阅读方式,这些阅读方式增强了思维方式。因此,学生共同创造了丰富的文本解释,这也通过写作作业导致了个人创造力的分析。社区导致了对丰富文本理解和活跃独立读者发展所必需的增强思维。

著录项

  • 作者

    Persoff Joanna Channah;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号