...
首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Education >Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations
【24h】

Qualitative study about the ways teachers react to feedback from resident evaluations

机译:关于教师对居民评价反馈的反应的定性研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Currently, one of the main interventions that are widely expected to contribute to teachers’ professional development is confronting teachers with feedback from resident evaluations of their teaching performance. Receiving feedback, however, is a double edged sword. Teachers see themselves confronted with information about themselves and are, at the same time, expected to be role models in the way they respond to feedback. Knowledge about the teachers’ responses could be not only of benefit for their professional development, but also for supporting their role modeling. Therefore, research about professional development should include the way teachers respond to feedback. Method We designed a qualitative study with semi-structured individual conversations about feedback reports, gained from resident evaluations. Two researchers carried out a systematic analysis using qualitative research software. The analysis focused on what happened in the conversations and structured the data in three main themes: conversation process, acceptance and coping strategies. Results The result section describes the conversation patterns and atmosphere. Teachers accepted their results calmly, stating that, although they recognised some points of interest, they could not meet with every standard. Most used coping strategies were explaining the results from their personal beliefs about good teaching and attributing poor results to external factors and good results to themselves. However, some teachers admitted that they had poor results because of the fact that they were not “sharp enough” in their resident group, implying that they did not do their best. Conclusions Our study not only confirms that the effects of feedback depend first and foremost on the recipient but also enlightens the meaning and role of acceptance and being a role model. We think that the results justify the conclusion that teachers who are responsible for the day release programmes in the three departments tend to respond to the evaluation results just like human beings do and, at the time of the conversation, are initially not aware of the fact that they are role models in the way they respond to feedback.
机译:背景技术目前,人们普遍期望对教师的专业发展做出贡献的主要干预措施之一就是让教师面对来自居民对其教学绩效的评估的反馈。但是,收到反馈是一把双刃剑。教师看到自己面对有关自己的信息,同时希望他们成为回应反馈的榜样。有关教师反应的知识不仅可以帮助他们的专业发展,而且可以支持他们的榜样。因此,有关专业发展的研究应包括教师对反馈的反应方式。方法我们设计了定性研究,对居民反馈中的反馈报告进行了半结构化的个人对话。两名研究人员使用定性研究软件进行了系统分析。该分析着重讨论了对话中发生的情况,并以三个主要主题对数据进行了结构化:对话过程,接受和应对策略。结果结果部分描述了对话方式和气氛。老师平静地接受了他们的成绩,并说,尽管他们认识到一些兴趣点,但并不能满足所有标准。最常用的应对策略是解释他们对良好教学的个人信念所产生的结果,并将不良结果归因于外部因素,并将良好结果归因于自己。但是,一些老师承认他们的成绩很差,因为他们在居民小组中不够“鲜明”,这意味着他们没有尽力而为。结论我们的研究不仅确认反馈的影响首先取决于接收者,而且还启发了接受的意义和作用以及成为榜样的作用。我们认为,该结果证明了以下结论:在三个部门中负责日间发布计划的教师倾向于像人类一样对评估结果做出反应,并且在交谈时最初并不了解这一事实。他们是回应反馈的榜样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号