首页> 外文学位 >Motivational factors and the language proficiency of learners of Arabic in selected American universities.
【24h】

Motivational factors and the language proficiency of learners of Arabic in selected American universities.

机译:某些美国大学中阿拉伯语学习者的动机因素和语言能力。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the relationships between motivational factors and language proficiency of learners of Arabic in selected American universities. Selected language learner variables influence Arabic language learning motivation and language proficiency. Participants were 266 students who were spread out across the United States. The questionnaire was divided into three parts: (a) demographic, (b) motivation factors which developed from previous study (Ryu Yang 2001), and (c) language proficiency adapted from the Sung Language Self-Assessment Questionnaire (SLSAQ), a self-report questionnaire which is used to measure students' proficiency in four language areas: listening, speaking, reading and writing.; In this study, the researcher found from the participants report that not only were intrinsic motivation (IM) factors more motivating than extrinsic motivation (EM) factors, but also that there were relationships between language proficiency and both extrinsic and intrinsic motivation factors. In addition, this study reported that the strongest skills were speaking and reading while listening and writing were the weakest.; Moreover, the researcher found that there was no correlation between extrinsic motivation, intrinsic motivation and gender. However, there was a negative weak significant correlation between EM and educational level. There was no significant correlation between IM and educational level. Also, there was a significant weak correlation between extrinsic and intrinsic motivations and language proficiency.; The researcher discovered that the three variables; gender, educational level, and language proficiency influence learners' EM and IM. The researcher concluded that gender had no significant effect on either EM or IM. Furthermore, language proficiency had no significant effect on either EM or IM. Additionally, the educational level had a significant effect on EM but no significant effect on IM.; Finally, the researcher encourages the teachers to utilize the motivational factors to reach the objectives of the students. Also, the researcher found opportunity for improvement; therefore, the researcher proposed some approaches to enhance teaching the four skills in the Arabic language.
机译:这项研究检查了动机因素与所选美国大学中阿拉伯语学习者的语言能力之间的关系。选择的语言学习者变量会影响阿拉伯语学习动机和语言能力。参加者有266名学生,分布在美国各地。问卷分为三个部分:(a)人口统计,(b)从先前的研究中发展出来的动机因素(Ryu Yang 2001),以及(c)从自我语言“ Sung Language自我评估问卷”(SLSAQ)改编而成的语言能力-报告问卷,用于测量学生在四个语言领域的能力:听,说,读,写;在这项研究中,研究人员从参与者的报告中发现,不仅内在动机(IM)的因素比外在动机(EM)的因素更有动机,而且语言能力与外在动机和内在动机的因素之间也存在关系。另外,这项研究报告说,最强的技能是听说读写,而最弱的是听和写。此外,研究人员发现,外在动机,内在动机与性别之间没有关联。但是,新兴市场与教育水平之间存在负的弱显着相关性。 IM和教育水平之间没有显着相关性。此外,外部动机和内在动机与语言能力之间的相关性也很弱。研究人员发现了这三个变量。性别,教育水平和语言能力会影响学习者的EM和IM。研究人员得出结论,性别对EM或IM均无显着影响。此外,语言水平对EM或IM均无显着影响。此外,教育水平对EM有显着影响,但对IM则无显着影响。最后,研究人员鼓励教师利用激励因素来达到学生的目标。此外,研究人员发现了改进的机会。因此,研究人员提出了一些方法来增强阿拉伯语四种技能的教学。

著录项

  • 作者

    AlAeraini, Ahmad.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Education Curriculum and Instruction.; Education Higher.; Education Language and Literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 102 p.
  • 总页数 102
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教育;高等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号