您现在的位置: 首页> 研究主题> 血压波动性

血压波动性

血压波动性的相关文献在1990年到2022年内共计84篇,主要集中在内科学、药学、中国医学 等领域,其中期刊论文78篇、会议论文1篇、专利文献456478篇;相关期刊59种,包括中国循环杂志、卒中与神经疾病、中国药理学报:英文版等; 相关会议1种,包括第六届国际心血管热点论坛暨心脏交叉学科论坛等;血压波动性的相关文献由186位作者贡献,包括苏定冯、夏作理、王云等。

血压波动性—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:78 占比:0.02%

会议论文>

论文:1 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:456478 占比:99.98%

总计:456557篇

血压波动性—发文趋势图

血压波动性

-研究学者

  • 苏定冯
  • 夏作理
  • 王云
  • 缪朝玉
  • 赵晓民
  • 韩纪举
  • 刘建国
  • 程勇
  • 秦树存
  • 蔡洪信
  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

年份

    • 王思梦; 韩秀娟; 龙妍; 黄素芳
    • 摘要: 目的了解住院主动脉夹层患者血压波动性现状,并探讨其影响因素。方法收集2019年1月—2020年6月在武汉市某三级甲等医院心脏大血管外科住院并行手术治疗的346例主动脉夹层患者的临床资料,对影响其血压波动性的相关因素进行多元线性回归分析。结果住院主动脉夹层患者收缩压波动为(11.65±3.60)mmHg(1 mmHg=0.133 kPa),舒张压波动为(8.03±1.98)mmHg;性别、年龄、高血压史、吸烟史、饮酒史、入院首诊血压(包括入院首诊收缩压和舒张压)、降压药的种类为血压波动性的主要影响因素(P<0.05)。结论主动脉夹层患者住院期间血压存在一定程度波动,建议医护人员在控制患者血压的同时减少血压的波动,以降低患者病情恶化及死亡风险,改善其预后。
    • 贾文彩
    • 摘要: 现阶段,医学领域对于血压波动性的和主动脉夹层的发生发展关系进行了研究,逐渐提起人们的重视.因为血压波动性会对患者内膜损伤和中膜层行性变,是在局部影响主动脉夹层的发生;还可以借助免疫反应、炎症的变化等全身因素引起主动脉夹层的发生.血压波动性多出现在已经发生主动脉夹层的患者当中,而且也是影响预后的重要原因,文章以下主要对血波动性的测量方法以及分类进行介绍,同时还对主动脉夹层发生发展影响的研究进展做进一步分析,主要是为医院临床医生研究主动脉夹层与血压波动性的关系,提供参考依据.
    • 李丽丽
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨家庭自测血压对高血压患者血压达标和血压波动性的评价作用.方法:选择我中心2016年11月至2018年7月期间本人管理的218例高血压患者,所有患者均进行家庭自测血压,依据血压家庭自测结果,分析血压达标情况,评价血压波动性.结果:①持续4周观察血压变化,早晨起床后血压显著升高,随后慢慢降低,夜间又慢慢升高.②一天中,10:00前218例患者血压达标率为59.17%(129/218),11:00-17:00期间218例患者血压达标率为78.89%(173/218),差异有统计学意义(X=9.095,P=0.002).结论:家庭自测血压,能够客观反映高血压患者全天血压控制情况,辅助医师分析病人血压长期波动性,具有推广性.
    • 于冠宇; 宋超; 冯翔; 周建; 景在平
    • 摘要: Hypertension is a kind of disease which seriously threatens human health.Recent studies have showed the target organ damage caused by blood pressure variability is greater than the high blood pressure.The relationship between hypertension and aortic dissection's occurrence and progression has attracted more and more attention recently.The variability of blood pressure can lead to local changes like the aortic vascular intima's damage and media's retrogression and induce systemic changes such as immune and inflammatory response,resulting in the occurrence of aortic dissection.Blood pressure variability is also an important factor affecting the prognosis of patients with aortic dissection already.The classification and measurement of the variability of blood pressure and the effect of blood pressure variability on the occurrence and progression of aortic dissection has been reviewed in this article with the purpose of providing a reference for the clinical study of the relationship between aortic dissection and blood pressure variability.%高血压病是严重威胁人类健康的一类疾病.近年来研究表明,血压波动对于靶器官的损伤较高血压本身更大.主动脉夹层是一种与高血压密切相关的疾病.近年来,主动脉夹层的发生发展与血压波动的关系,越来越受到关注.血压波动性可造成内膜损伤和中膜层退行性变,从而在局部影响主动脉夹层的发生;还可通过免疫反应,炎性变化等全身因素造成主动脉夹层的发生.血压波动性在已发生主动脉夹层的患者中也是影响预后的重要因素.本文主要介绍血压波动性的分类和测量方法,以及对主动脉夹层发生发展影响的研究进展,旨在为临床医生进行主动脉夹层与血压波动性的关系研究提供参考.
    • 王琛; 刘薇薇; 陈国芳; 周生奎; 平蕾; 刘雷婧; 张冬梅
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨急性脑出血患者90 d临床预后的相关危险因素,并分析脑出血最初24 h血压变异性与预后的关系.方法 选取徐州市中心医院神经内科2013年10月~2016年1月收治6 h内入院的高血压性脑出血患者124例.用mRS(modified Rankin Scale)量表表示患者90 d临床预后,0~1分判定预后良好组及2~6分为预后不良组,分别记录入院后24 h内不同时间段的的收缩压和舒张压(32次血压值),用血压标准差(SD)、变异系数(CV)及最大-最小差值(Max-Min)来表示血压波动性(BPV).用多因素logistic回归分析血压波动性与患者90 d临床预后的关系.结果 (1)2组基线水平(年龄、性别、血肿体积、入院神经功能评分如GCS,NIHSS)无明显差异(P>0.05),2组血压波动性有明显差异(P<0.05);(2)spearman相关分析显示收缩压的BPV(SD、CV、Max-Min)与90 d临床预后呈正相关,其相关系数分别为0.188,0.35,0.272,P均<0.05;(3)多因素Logisitic回归分析显示收缩压及舒张压的SD、CV、Max-Min与90 d临床预后有关,其中收缩压OR分别为5.12,3.477,5.12,P均<0.01;舒张压OR分别为1.35,2.24,1.04,P均<0.05.结论 急性高血压性脑出血患者的最初24 h收缩压的血压波动性是影响90 d临床预后的重要因素,早期平稳降压有利于临床预后.%Objective To analyze the related risk factors of 90-day clinical outcomes in cerebral hemorrhage patients with hypertension and to evaluate the relation between blood pressure (BP) variability and the 90 days clinical outcome.Methods 124 acute spontaneous ICH patients were identified and enrolled in Xuzhou Central Hospital from October 2013 to 2016 January for within 6 hours from the onset of symptoms. The measurement of outcome was the 90 days functional status assessed by the modified Rankin Scale following a baseline severity-adjusted analysis.The primary outcome was death or major disability at 90th day (modified Rankin Scale score 2) and the secondary outcome was an ordinal shift in modified Rankin Scale scores at 90th day.BP measurements over the first 24 hours after admission were recorded(total 32), and standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV), maximum minimum difference (Max-Min) were determined to characterize both systolic and diastolic BP variability (BPV). Estimated associations between blood pressure variability and outcomes were analyzed by logistic and proportional odds regression models in this study.Results Among the 124 enrolled patients with ICH, there is a statistically significant difference in blood pressure variability of two groups (P<0.05).In the Spearman correlation analysis, only the systolic blood pressure of guideline-recommended group BPV (SD, CV, MAX-MIN) was positively related to clinical outcomes (r=0.188, 0.35, 0.272, P<0.05).A dose response relationship with a poor outcome was found for each measure of systolic BPV-adjusted odd ratios (ORs) for the highest third of SD,CV,Max-Min(OR=5.12,3.477,5.12,P<0.01). The strength of association with diastolic BPV turned out to be weaker and significant only for the higher values (adjusted ORs for the highest thirds of SD,CV,Max-Min:1.35,2.24,1.04,P<0.05).Conclusion In patients, Baseline characteristics of patients with acute ICH were similar between groups,BPV was a strong predictor of 90 days clinical outcome and might represent a still neglected potential therapeutic target. The benefits of early treatment to reduce blood pressure might be improved by smooth and sustained control, and particularly by avoiding peaks in systolic blood pressure.
    • 程敏; 王梦琳; 徐燕
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨原发性高血压病患者血压波动性(BPV)与颅内外动脉狭窄的关系及其对颅内外动脉狭窄发生的预测价值.方法 选取2013年8月-2015年10月在北京大学人民医院住院的原发性高血压病患者共80例.对患者进行24 h动态血压监测(ABPM),以血压读数的标准差(SD)代表BPV值.采用CT血管造影(CTA)和/或磁共振血管造影(MRA)诊断患者颅内外动脉的狭窄程度.采用Spearman相关性分析探讨原发性高血压病患者BPV与颅内外动脉狭窄的关系,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评价24 h BPV预测颅内外动脉狭窄发生的价值.结果 Spearman相关分析结果显示,24 h、昼间的BPV与颅内外动脉狭窄呈正相关(P<0.05).24 h收缩压SD对颅内外动脉狭窄预测的ROC曲线下面积为0.712〔95%CI(0.595,0.829),P=0.004〕;24 h舒张压SD对颅内外动脉狭窄预测的ROC曲线下面积为0.690〔95%CI(0.568,0.812),P=0.009〕.结论 24 h、昼间的BPV与颅内外动脉狭窄呈正相关,24 h BPV对颅内外动脉狭窄的发生有一定的预测价值.%Objective To explore the relationship between blood pressure variability (BPV)and intracranial/extracranial artery stenosis in primary hypertensive patients,and the value of BPV on predicting intracranial/ extracranial arterial stenosis. Methods The enrolled participants were 80 primary hypertensive patients who received inpatient treatment from Peking University People′s Hospital from August 2013 to October 2015. 24 h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM)were performed. BPV was assessed as the within - subject standard deviation of blood pressure readings. CT angiography (CTA)and/ or magnetic resonance angiography (MRA)examinations were performed to diagnose the stenosis of the intracranial/ extracranial artery stenosis. Spearman correlation analysis was conducted to investigate the relationship between BPV and intracranial/extracranial artery stenosis in primary hypertension. ROC curve analysis was carried out to assess the value of 24 h BPV for the prediction of intracranial/ extracranial arterial stenosis. Results The Spearman correlation analysis showed that both 24 h BPV and daytime BPV were positively correlated with the severity of intracranial/ extracranial artery stenosis (P < 0. 05). The area under the ROC curve of 24 h systolic SD for the prediction of intracranial/ extracranial artery stenosis was 0. 712 〔95% CI (0. 595,0. 829),P = 0. 004〕. The area under the ROC curve of 24 h diastolic SD for the prediction of intracranial/ extracranial artery stenosis was 0. 690 〔95% CI (0. 568,0. 812 ),P = 0. 009〕. Conclusion 24 h BPV and daytime BPV were significantly related to intraeranial/ extracranial artery stenosis. 24 h BPV could predict the occurrence of intracranial/ extracranial artery stenosis.
    • 王丽冰
    • 摘要: 目的:研究老年原发性高血压患者合并2型糖尿病患者动态血压检测与血压波动性的临床分析。方法:选取2015年11月-2016年11月经我院确诊为原发性高血压和糖尿病合并原发性老年患者纳入180例,根据无糖尿病分为治疗组87例原发性高血压,对照组93例糖尿病合并原发性高血压。24h检测(ABP)动态血压,对比两组患者血压波动性(BPV)与动态血压(ABP)的数值。结果:研究显示,老年糖尿病合并原发性高血压患者夜间收缩压数值显著增高(P〈0.01);24h与日间收缩压血压变异性明显增大(P〈0.05)。结论:糖尿病自主神经可能对2型糖尿病患者合并老年原发性高血压患者动态血压和血压波动性变大有一定影响,造成正常血压节律失衡。
    • 王丽冰
    • 摘要: 目的:研究老年原发性高血压患者合并2型糖尿病患者动态血压检测与血压波动性的临床分析.方法:选取2015年11月-2016年11月经我院确诊为原发性高血压和糖尿病合并原发性老年患者纳入180例,根据无糖尿病分为治疗组87例原发性高血压,对照组93例糖尿病合并原发性高血压.24h检测(ABP)动态血压,对比两组患者血压波动性(BPV)与动态血压(ABP)的数值.结果:研究显示,老年糖尿病合并原发性高血压患者夜间收缩压数值显著增高(P<0.01);24h与日间收缩压血压变异性明显增大(P<0.05).结论:糖尿病自主神经可能对2型糖尿病患者合并老年原发性高血压患者动态血压和血压波动性变大有一定影响,造成正常血压节律失衡.
    • 董炜
    • 摘要: 目的探讨血压波动性对社区老年高血压患者睡眠质量及认知功能的影响。方法选取2015年9月至2016年11月于医院进行治疗的老年高血压患者135例,均行24 h动态血压检测,并根据夜间血压下降率分为杓型组(47例)、非杓型组(42例)、超杓型组(25例)、反杓型组(21例),比较各组间睡眠质量及认知功能。结果与杓型组比较,非杓型组、超杓型组及反杓型组简易智能状况检查(MMSE)评分、睡眠时间及觉醒次数均改善,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);与非杓型组比较,超杓型组及反杓型组MMSE评分、睡眠时间及觉醒次数均改善,比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论血压波动性将影响社区老年高血压患者睡眠质量,损伤患者认知功能。
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号