This study is descriptive research investigating metacognitive reading strategies which are frequently used among university students in reading TOEFL test materials at English Education Program in Bandung, West Java. This study also aims to find out which metacognitive reading strategies are considered the most helpful for the students especially in answering questions in reading comprehension test successfully and the reasons why they employed those strategies.ududThe participants of this study were third-year students of English Education Program in Bandung. The data were obtained from three sources as interviews, TAPs (Thinking-Aloud Protocols) that followed Aengpongpaow (2008) and reading journals which were conducted with 20 students; 10 high and low achieving students. The data were analyzed using instruments adapted from Metacognitive Reading Strategies Categories based on Cohen (1998) and previous study conducted by Kummin&Rahman (2010).ududThe results of data analysis show that high and low achieving students most frequently used repetition, problem solving, using contextual clues, skimming, background knowledge, and translation. The analysis also shows that there were differences in term of frequency and the way how the students use the strategies. In addition, regarding to the research question about the most helpful metacognitive reading strategies for students especially when answering questions in reading comprehension test successfully, it was found that the students who successfully answered questions in reading comprehension test used three metacognitive reading strategies such as skimming, looking for specific purposes and using contextual clues. Finally, based on the data, it is indicated that the students employed metacognitive strategies because: (a) it is easier to understand the text, (b) it is easier to answer the questions, (c) it is easier to know the main idea of the text, and (d) it helps the students to solve their problems in reading. Considering the limited participants in this study, it is suggested to carry out further research by using large group of participants in order to have a wider perspective. Such information can help teachers to think further about what treatment should be conducted to enhance students’ reading comprehension.
展开▼
机译:这项研究是描述性研究,旨在研究元认知阅读策略,这些策略在西爪哇万隆的英语教育计划中的大学生中经常阅读TOEFL考试材料。这项研究还旨在找出哪种元认知阅读策略对学生最有帮助,尤其是在成功回答阅读理解测试中的问题以及他们采用这些策略的原因上。 ud ud该研究的参与者是三年级学生万隆英语教育课程。数据来自三种来源,即访谈,即遵循Aengpongpaow(2008)的TAP(思维大声协议)和阅读与20名学生共同编写的期刊的方法。 10名成绩优异的学生。使用基于Cohen(1998)的元认知阅读策略类别和以前由Kummin&Rahman(2010)进行的研究进行改编的工具对数据进行分析。 ud ud数据分析的结果表明,成绩优异的学生和成绩低下的学生最常使用重复,解决问题的能力,使用上下文线索,浏览,背景知识和翻译。分析还表明,频率和学生使用策略的方式存在差异。此外,针对有关对学生最有帮助的元认知阅读策略的研究问题,尤其是在成功回答阅读理解测试中的问题时,发现在阅读理解测试中成功回答问题的学生使用了三种元认知阅读策略,例如:略读,寻找特定目的并使用上下文线索。最后,根据数据表明,学生采用了元认知策略,因为:(a)易于理解课文,(b)易于回答问题,(c)易于理解主要内容(d)帮助学生解决阅读中的问题。考虑到本研究的参与者有限,建议使用大量的参与者进行进一步研究,以便有更广阔的视野。这些信息可以帮助教师进一步思考应该采取什么措施来增强学生的阅读理解能力。
展开▼