首页> 外文学位 >Volatile compounds from dough, fermented dough, bread and popcorn: Comparison of headspace analytical methods.
【24h】

Volatile compounds from dough, fermented dough, bread and popcorn: Comparison of headspace analytical methods.

机译:面团,发酵面团,面包和爆米花中的挥发性化合物:顶空分析方法的比较。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Direct helium purge (DHP) was used to observe the volatile compounds from fresh bread crust, crumb and commercial flavored and non-flavored microwave popcorn. The obtained results were compared with supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) followed by DHP. Results show that the sensitivity of the latter method (SFE-DHP), in general, was several fold higher than DHP itself. Several flavor compounds reported previously in the literature using other techniques were found in this study with relatively very little sample preparation time. Previously reported high flavor dilution (FD) compounds like 2-acetyl-tetrahydropyridine, 4-vinylguaiacol, 2-phenylacetaldehyde and 2-acetyl-1-pyrroline were found by both the methods in popcorn. In popcorn, except for 2-methyl pyrazine, all the observed pyrazines were 2–6 fold higher with the SFE-DHP method. Methionol was found in bread about 10 fold higher by SFE-DHP method than by DHP method alone. SFE-DHP method showed lower abundance towards very volatile compounds due to inefficient trapping before the DHP. However, higher boiling compounds, relatively non-volatile compounds were least extracted by DHP method. The supercritical fluid (SF) extract from popcorn was also used to compare the solid-phase micro extraction (SPME) headspace technique along with injecting the SF extract directly into the gas chromatograph. SFE-SPME showed higher sensitivity towards pyrazines. Furaneol, vanillin, sulfurol, maltoxaine, and Y-nonalactone were found to be higher by the SFE-direct injection (DI) method. Direct SPME on popcorn headspace was compared with SFE-SPME. Results showed over 10 fold increase by SFE-SPME technique. Volatile compounds from several stages of breadmaking for pup straight dough (PSD) and sponge and dough (SD) methods were compared using DHP technique. Due to the increased fermentation time in the SD method, several compounds were found at higher levels than in the PSD bread crumb. 2,6-Nonadienal, 2-nonen-1-ol, E-2-nonanal and nonanal were found to be higher in the SD bread crumb. E-6-Nonenal was found only in the bread crumb by both the PSD and SD methods, with an increased level with the latter method. Proofing increased the level of acetoin in the SD method. Several furan compounds and pyrazines were found to be at higher level in the bread crust made by PSD method.
机译:使用直接氦气吹扫(DHP)来观察新鲜面包皮,面包屑以及市售风味和非风味微波爆米花中的挥发性化合物。将获得的结果与超临界流体萃取(SFE)和DHP进行比较。结果表明,后一种方法(SFE-DHP)的灵敏度通常比DHP本身高几倍。在这项研究中发现了以前使用其他技术在文献中报道的几种调味剂化合物,样品制备时间相对很少。两种方法都在爆米花中发现了以前报道的高风味稀释(FD)化合物,例如2-乙酰基-四氢吡啶,4-乙烯基愈创木酚,2-苯基乙醛和2-乙酰基-1-吡咯啉。在爆米花中,除2-甲基吡嗪外,使用SFE-DHP方法观察到的所有吡嗪均高2至6倍。通过SFE-DHP方法,发现面包中的甲硫醇比单独使用DHP方法高约10倍。由于在DHP之前捕集效率低,SFE-DHP方法显示出对极易挥发化合物的丰度较低。但是,沸点较高的化合物,相对非挥发性的化合物最少可通过DHP方法提取。从爆米花中提取的超临界流体(SF)也用于比较固相微提取(SPME)顶空技术,并将SF提取物直接注入气相色谱仪中。 SFE-SPME对吡嗪显示出更高的敏感性。通过SFE直接注射(DI)方法发现了呋喃酚,香兰素,硫醇,麦芽还和Y-壬内酯的含量更高。将爆米花顶部空间上的直接SPME与SFE-SPME进行了比较。结果表明,采用SFE-SPME技术可提高10倍以上。使用DHP技术比较了用于纯面包面团(PSD)和海绵和面团(SD)方法的面包制作各个阶段的挥发性化合物。由于SD方法中发酵时间的增加,发现一些化合物的含量高于PSD面包屑中的含量。 SD面包屑中的2,6-壬二醛,2-壬烯-1-醇,E-2-壬醛和壬醛含量更高。 PSD和SD方法均仅在面包屑中发现E-6-无醛,后一种方法的含量增加。校对增加了SD方法中乙酰丙酮的水平。通过PSD方法制得的面包皮中发现了几种呋喃化合物和吡嗪的含量较高。

著录项

  • 作者

    Rengarajan, Ramachandran.;

  • 作者单位

    Kansas State University.;

  • 授予单位 Kansas State University.;
  • 学科 Agriculture Food Science and Technology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 145 p.
  • 总页数 145
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 农产品收获、加工及贮藏;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号