首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing Young Thinkers: Discovering Baseline Understandings of Effective Thinking among Children and Teachers and Intervening to Enhance Thinking Skills
【2h】

Developing Young Thinkers: Discovering Baseline Understandings of Effective Thinking among Children and Teachers and Intervening to Enhance Thinking Skills

机译:培养年轻的思想家:发现儿童和教师对有效思维的基本认识并进行干预以提高思维能力

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This thesis considers teachers’ and pupils’ conceptions of effective thinking, andudanalyses how these are developed through an explicit thinking skills intervention. Anudanalysis of children’s concepts of intelligence has shown that, with age, children tendudto associate ‘cleverness’ with knowledge acquisition rather than active thinking.udPerhaps as a reflection of this it is increasingly popular to teach thinking skills inudschools, although how best to support practitioners in this task remains contested. Thisudthesis presents findings from three linked studies conducted to discover pupils’ andudpractitioners’ understandings of ‘effective thinking’ (which few research studies haveudattempted) before intervening to explicitly enhance children’s thinking skills.udStudy 1 was questionnaire-based and investigated teachers’ definitions of effectiveudthinking, their views of thinking skills taught within the curriculum and whetherudthinking skills are fostered developmentally. 127 questionnaires were returnedudrepresenting teachers from 36 primary schools in central Scotland. A qualitativeudanalysis of teachers’ concepts indicated that many did not have a clear understandingudof ‘effective thinking’. Quantitative data indicated that practitioners believe thinkingudskills are more frequently integrated into some curricular areas than others andudhighlighted the lack of a developmental progression of thinking skills being taughtudthroughout primary school.udIn Study 2, 75 children were interviewed with 25 children from each of the followingudages: 5, 7 and 11 years. This study explored the development of children’s definitionsudof intelligence and effective thinking and the characteristics and causes associated withudeach. It also produced novel data on how children’s knowledge of thinking skillsudchanges over time. Content analysis revealed age trends in children’s definitions ofudintelligence, as, with age, children were increasingly likely to hold cognitive views andudincorporate knowledge into those definitions. Whilst no age trends were found inudchildren’s concepts of effective thinking, with all three age groups defining it as audcognitive ability, clear developmental trends emerged in children’s understandings ofudindividual thinking skills. The final study (involving 178 primary 7 pupils and their teachers) challenged theseudconcepts through an intervention designed to evaluate the effects of infusing thinkingudskills throughout the curriculum, and investigated the belief that collaborative learningudenhances thinking skills. There were three intervention conditions: collaborative,udindividual and control. Six thinking skills were focused on, with training sessions andudcurricular lesson plans devised to support practitioners. The intervention lessons wereudbased on an identified underpinning pedagogy of effective thinking (i.e., making theudthinking skill explicit; fostering appropriate thinking dispositions; developingudmetacognition and encouraging transfer). The intervention evaluation utilisedudstandardised and study-specific pre- and post-tests. Results demonstrated statisticallyudsignificant gains for the individual and collaborative learning conditions in a range ofudthinking skills. The greatest increase in performance was seen in the collaborativeudlearning condition.udThese three studies highlight the importance of gathering baseline data onudunderstandings of effective thinking before intervening to successfully developudawareness of the cognitive processes involved in ‘good thinking’ and enhanceudchildren’s thinking skills. The findings from this thesis have significant implicationsudfor education; practitioners need clearer guidance on how to teach a coherentuddevelopmental progression of thinking skills, and need to be supported when explicitlyudinfusing thinking skills throughout the curriculum.
机译:本文考虑了教师和学生的有效思维概念,并 u分析了通过明确的思维技能干预如何发展这些概念。对儿童智力概念的分析表明,随着年龄的增长,儿童倾向于将“聪明”与知识的获取而不是积极的思维联系起来。 ud也许反映了这一点,在 udschool中教授思维技能的情况越来越普遍,尽管在该任务中如何最好地支持从业人员仍存在争议。本研究提出了三项相关研究的发现,这些研究旨在发现学生和实践者对“有效思维”的理解(很少有研究已经尝试过),然后进行干预以显着提高儿童的思维能力。 ud研究1基于问卷调查,调查了教师对有效思考的定义,他们对课程中所教授的思考技能的看法以及是否在发展中培养了思考能力的观点。返回了127份问卷,代表苏格兰中部36所小学的老师。对教师概念的定性否定分析表明,许多教师对“有效思维”的理解不清晰。定量数据表明,从业者认为,思维/技巧比其他课程更容易融入某些课程领域,并突显了小学阶段所教授的思维能力缺乏发展。 ud在研究2中,有75名儿童与25名儿童进行了访谈。根据以下每个 udage:5、7和11年。这项研究探讨了儿童定义,智力和有效思维的发展以及与学习相关的特征和原因。它还产生了关于儿童随着时间的推移如何思考思维能力/变化的新颖数据。内容分析揭示了儿童对“智力”定义的年龄趋势,因为随着年龄的增长,儿童越来越有可能持有认知观点并将知识纳入这些定义。虽然 udchild儿童的有效思维概念没有发现年龄趋势,但所有三个年龄组都将其定义为 udcognitive能力,但孩子对 udividual思维技巧的理解却出现了明显的发展趋势。最终研究(涉及178名小学7年级学生及其老师)通过一项旨在评估整个课程中注入思维/技能的效果的干预措施,对这些观念提出了挑战,并调查了对协作学习/增强思维技能的看法。共有三种干预条件:协作,个人和控制。着重于六种思维技能,并设计了培训课程和课程计划以支持从业者。干预课程基于已确定的有效思维基础教学法(即,使思维能力清晰;培养适当的思维倾向;发展认知能力并鼓励转移)。干预评估采用了标准化,针对研究的预测试和后测试。结果表明,在一系列深思熟虑的技能中,个人学习和协作学习条件的统计学上显着的提高。在协作学习环境中,表现的提高最大。 ud这三项研究强调了在进行干预以成功地发展/理解“良好思维”所涉及的认知过程并增强其意识之前,收集关于有效思维理解的基线数据的重要性。 udchildren的思维能力。本文的研究结果对教育具有重要意义。从业者需要更清晰的指导,以指导如何教授连贯的/发展的思维技巧,并且在整个课程中明确/融合思维技巧时需要得到支持。

著录项

  • 作者

    Burke Lynsey A;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2007
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号