首页> 外文OA文献 >Nursing Ethics Education in Finland from the Perspective of Codes of Ethics
【2h】

Nursing Ethics Education in Finland from the Perspective of Codes of Ethics

机译:道德规范视角下的芬兰护理伦理教育

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The purpose of this study was to analyze nursing ethics education from the perspective of nurses’ codes of ethics in the basic nursing education programmes in polytechnics in Finland with the following research questions: What is known about nurses’ codes in practice and education, what contents of the codes are taught, what teaching and evaluation methods are used, which demographic variables are associated with the teaching, what is nurse educators’ adequacy of knowledge to teach the codes and nursing students’ knowledge of and ability to apply the codes, and what are participants’ opinions of the need and applicability of the codes, and their importance in nursing ethics education. The aim of the study was to identify strengths and possible problem areas in teaching of the codes and nursing ethics in general. The knowledge gained from this study can be used for developing nursing ethics curricula and teaching of ethics in theory and practice. The data collection was targeted to all polytechnics in Finland providing basic nursing education (i.e. Bachelor of Health Care). The target groups were all nurse educators teaching ethics and all graduating nursing students in the academic year of 2006. A total of 183 educators and 214 students from 24 polytechnics participated. The data was collected using a structured questionnaire with four open-ended questions, designed for this study. The data was analysed by SPSS (14.0) and the open-ended questions by inductive content analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data. Inferential statistics were used to estimate the differences between the participant groups. The reliability of the questionnaire was estimated with Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. The literature review revealed that empirical research on the codes was scarce, and minimal in the area of education. Teaching of nurses’ codes themselves and the embedded ethical concepts was extensive, teaching of the functions of the codes and related laws and agreements was moderate, but teaching of the codes of other health care professions was modest. Issues related to the nurse-patient relationship were emphasised. Wider social dimensions of the codes were less emphasized. Educators’ and students’ descriptions of teaching emphasized mainly the same teaching contents, but there were statistically significant differences between the groups in that educators assessed their teaching to be more extensive than what students had perceived it had been. The use of teaching and evaluation methods was rather narrow and conventional. However, educators’ and students’ descriptions of the used methods differed statistically significantly. Students’ knowledge of the codes and their ability to apply them in practice was assessed as mediocre by educators and by students themselves. Most educators assessed their own knowledge of the codes as adequate to teach the codes, as did most of the students. Educators who regarded their knowledge as adequate taught the codes more extensively than those who assessed their knowledge as less adequate. Also students who assessed their educators’ knowledge as adequate perceived the teaching of the codes to be more extensive. Otherwise educators’ and students’ demographic variables had little association with their descriptions of the teaching. According to the participants, nurses need their own codes, and they are also regarded as applicable in practice. The codes are an important element in nursing ethics education, but their teaching needs development. Further research should focus on the organization of ethics teaching in the curricula, the teaching process, and on the evaluation of the effectiveness of ethics education and on educators’ competence. Also the meaning and functions of the codes at all levels of nursing deserve attention. More versatile use of research methods would be beneficial in gaining new knowledge.
机译:这项研究的目的是从芬兰理工学院基础护理教育计划中的护士道德守则的角度分析护理道德教育,并提出以下研究问题:对实践和教育中的护士守则了解多少,内容如何?教授了哪些守则,使用了哪些教学和评估方法,与该教学有关的人口统计学变量,什么是护士教育者的知识足以教授该守则以及护理学生的知识和运用该守则的能力以及什么?是参与者对准则的必要性和适用性及其在护理伦理教育中的重要性的看法。这项研究的目的是确定在规范和护理伦理学教学中的长处和可能存在的问题领域。从这项研究中获得的知识可用于开发护理伦理课程以及理论和实践中的伦理教学。数据收集针对的是芬兰所有提供基础护理教育的理工学院(即卫生学学士)。目标人群是2006学年所有护理伦理学的护士教育者和所有应届护理专业的学生。来自24个理工学院的183名教育者和214名学生参加了培训。数据是使用针对此研究设计的带有四个开放性问题的结构化问卷收集的。通过SPSS(14.0)分析数据,通过归纳内容分析分析开放式问题。描述性统计用于汇总数据。推论统计被用来估计参与者组之间的差异。问卷的可靠性通过Cronbach系数α估算。文献综述表明,对密码的实证研究很少,在教育领域则很少。护士守则本身和内在的道德观念的教学广泛,守则的职能以及相关法律和协议的教学适度,而其他卫生保健专业的守则则适度。强调了与医患关系的问题。守则的社会层面较少强调。教育者和学生对教学的描述主要强调了相同的教学内容,但是两组之间在统计学上存在显着差异,因为教育者认为他们的教学比学生所认为的要广泛。教学和评估方法的使用范围很窄,属于常规形式。但是,教育者和学生对所用方法的描述在统计上有显着差异。教育者和学生本人对学生对代码的了解及其在实践中应用代码的能力被评为中等。与大多数学生一样,大多数教育者认为自己对密码的知识足以教密码。认为知识足够的教育者比认为知识不足的教育者更广泛地讲授代码。同样,评估他们的教育者的知识足够的学生认为代码的教学范围更广。否则,教育者和学生的人口统计学变量与他们对教学的描述几乎没有关联。与会人员认为,护士需要自己的密码,在实践中也被认为是适用的。守则是护理伦理教育的重要组成部分,但其教学需要发展。进一步的研究应侧重于课程中的道德教学组织,教学过程,以及对道德教育的有效性和教育者的能力进行评估。同样,护理各个级别的法规的含义和功能也应引起注意。研究方法的更多用途将有利于获得新知识。

著录项

  • 作者

    Numminen Olivia;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2010
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号