首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >Association between mobilization regimen and PFS after auto-SCT for multiple myeloma
【24h】

Association between mobilization regimen and PFS after auto-SCT for multiple myeloma

机译:auto-SCT后多发性骨髓瘤的动员方案与PFS之间的关联

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Filgrastim (G-CSF) is commonly combined with either chemotherapy (typically CY) or plerixafor for mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) before auto-SCT for multiple myeloma. These G-CSF-based combinations are often preferred to G-CSF alone because they reliably allow collection of sufficient HSCs for multiple auto-SCTs. Few studies have examined the association between mobilization regimen and post-auto-SCT multiple myeloma outcomes. One retrospective analysis compared outcomes after mobilization with G-CSF+CY vs G-CSF alone and found no PFS difference; this study, however, pre-dated the availability of plerixafor and widespread use of pretransplant lenalidomide and bortezomib. The prospective, randomized study of plerixafor in multiple myeloma patients did not include a chemotherapy-based mobilization arm and did not report long-term multiple myeloma outcomes.
机译:非格司亭(G-CSF)通常与化学疗法(通常为CY)或普来沙福联合使用,以在进行多发性骨髓瘤的自动SCT之前动员造血干细胞(HSC)。这些基于G-CSF的组合通常比单独使用G-CSF更可取,因为它们可靠地允许为多个自动SCT收集足够的HSC。很少有研究检查动员方案与自动SCT后多发性骨髓瘤预后之间的关系。一项回顾性分析比较了动员后单独使用G-CSF + CY与单独使用G-CSF的结果,发现PFS没有差异。然而,这项研究早于普来沙福的可用性以及来那度胺和硼替佐米的移植前广泛使用。在多发性骨髓瘤患者中使用plerixafor进行的前瞻性随机研究未包括基于化疗的动员组,也未报告长期的多发性骨髓瘤预后。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号