首页> 外文期刊>Bone marrow transplantation >A randomized study of melphalan 200 mg/m(2) vs 280 mg/m(2) as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-SCT
【24h】

A randomized study of melphalan 200 mg/m(2) vs 280 mg/m(2) as a preparative regimen for patients with multiple myeloma undergoing auto-SCT

机译:美法仑200 mg / m(2)和280 mg / m(2)作为多发性骨髓瘤患者接受自动SCT的准备方案的随机研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We aimed to examine whether doses of melphalan higher than 200 mg/m(2) improve response rates when used as conditioning before autologous transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Patients with MM, n=131, were randomized to 200 mg/m(2) (mel200) vs 280 mg/m(2) (mel280) using amifostine pretreatment. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving near complete response (>= nCR). No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study. Responses following ASCT were for mel200 vs mel280, respectively, >= nCR 22 vs 39%, P=0.03, >= PR 57 vs 74%, P=0.04. The hazard of mortality was not statistically significantly different between groups (mel200 vs mel280; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.15 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.62-2.13, P=0.66)) nor was the rate of progression/mortality (HR = 0.81 (0.52-1.27, P=0.36)). The estimated PFS at 1 and 3 years were 83 and 46%, respectively, for mel200 and 78 and 54%, respectively, for mel280. Amifostine and mel280 were well tolerated, with no grade 4 regimen-related toxicities and only one grade 3 mucositis (none with mel200) and three grade 3 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities (two in mel200). Hospitalization rates were more frequent in the mel280 group (59 vs 43%, P=0.08). Mel280 resulted in a higher major response rate (CR+nCR) and should be evaluated in larger studies.
机译:我们旨在研究多发性骨髓瘤(MM)患者在自体移植(ASCT)之前用作调理品时,高于200 mg / m(2)的美法仑剂量是否能提高缓解率。 MM患者(n = 131)使用氨磷汀预处理被随机分为200 mg / m(2)(mel200)和280 mg / m(2)(mel280)。主要终点是达到完全缓解(> = nCR)的患者比例。在这项研究中没有发生与治疗有关的死亡。 ASCT后的响应分别为mel200 vs mel280,> = nCR 22 vs 39%,P = 0.03,> = PR 57 vs 74%,P = 0.04。两组之间的死亡危险在统计学上没有显着差异(mel200与mel280;危险比(HR)= 1.15(95%置信区间(CI),0.62-2.13,P = 0.66)),病程/死亡率也无统计学差异( HR = 0.81(0.52-1.27,P = 0.36))。 mel200在1年和3年时的估计PFS分别为83%和46%,mel280在78%和54%。氨磷汀和mel280的耐受性良好,没有4级方案相关的毒性,只有1级3级粘膜炎(无mel200)和3级3级胃肠道(GI)毒性(mel200有2级)。 mel280组的住院率更高(59%vs 43%,P = 0.08)。 Mel280导致较高的主要缓解率(CR + nCR),应在较大的研究中进行评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号