首页> 外文期刊>Psychology in the schools >Improving oral reading fluency in middle-school students: A comparison of repeated reading and listening passage preview
【24h】

Improving oral reading fluency in middle-school students: A comparison of repeated reading and listening passage preview

机译:在中学生中提高口腔读数流畅:重复阅读和听力段预览的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Oral reading fluency has been established in previous literature as a key component in becoming an effective reader. Repeated reading (RR) and listening passage preview (LPP) are both oral reading fluency interventions well-supported in the research literature, however, most of this study explores their use with elementary-aged children, with only a handful of studies over the last 20 years evaluating their use in middle-school children. The overall goal of the current study was to explore the effectiveness of both of these interventions independent and relative to one another. An alternating treatment design (A/ABC), including the use of baseline, was implemented to compare RR, LPP, and a control. Three middle school-aged struggling readers were randomly exposed to the conditions over time, with oral reading fluency acting as the primary dependent variable. Data were analyzed using visual analysis and effect size calculated using nonoverlap of all pairs (NAP). The results indicated primarily large effects for RR, with LPP effects ranging from small to large across participants. Limitations, implications, and future directions are also discussed.
机译:在以前的文献中成立了口腔阅读流畅,作为成为一个有效读者的关键组成部分。重复阅读(RR)和听力通行证预览(LPP)既是口头读数流畅干预,也在研究文献中得到了很好的支持,然而,大多数本研究探讨了与基本老年儿童的用途,只有少数研究20年评估他们在中学生的使用。目前研究的总体目标是探讨这两种干预措施的有效性独立,相对于彼此。实施了另外处理设计(A / ABC),包括使用基线,以比较RR,LPP和控制。三名中学老年的斗争读者随着时间的推移被随机暴露在条件下,口服读数流畅起到主要依赖变量。使用所有对(NAP)计算的视觉分析和效果大小进行分析数据。结果表明RR的大量效果大,LPP效应从参与者的小到大。还讨论了限制,含义和未来方向。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号