首页> 外文期刊>Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society >Comparison of dimensionally split and multi-dimensional atmospheric transport schemes for long time steps
【24h】

Comparison of dimensionally split and multi-dimensional atmospheric transport schemes for long time steps

机译:长时间步骤比较尺寸分割和多维大气输送方案的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Dimensionally split advection schemes are attractive for atmospheric modelling due to their efficiency and accuracy in each spatial dimension. Accurate long time steps can be achieved without significant cost using the flux-form semi-Lagrangian technique. The dimensionally split scheme used in this paper is constructed from the one-dimensional Piecewise Parabolic Method and extended to two dimensions using COSMIC splitting. The dimensionally split scheme is compared with a genuinely multi-dimensional, method-of-lines scheme which, with implicit time-stepping, is stable for Courant numbers significantly larger than 1. Two-dimensional advection test cases on Cartesian planes are proposed which avoid the complexities of a spherical domain or multi-panel meshes. These are solid-body rotation, horizontal advection over orography and deformational flow. The test cases use distorted non-orthogonal meshes either to represent sloping terrain or to mimic the distortions near cubed-sphere edges. Mesh distortions are expected to accentuate the errors associated with dimension splitting, however the accuracy of the dimensionally split scheme decreases only a little in the presence of mesh distortions. The dimensionally split scheme also loses some accuracy when long time steps are used. The multi-dimensional scheme is almost entirely insensitive to mesh distortions and asymptotes to second-order accuracy at high resolution. As is expected for implicit time-stepping, phase errors occur when using long time steps but the spatially well-resolved features are advected at the correct speed and the multi-dimensional scheme is always stable. A naive estimate of computational cost (number of multiplies) reveals that the implicit scheme is the most expensive, particularly for large Courant numbers. If the multi-dimensional scheme is used instead with explicit time-stepping, the Courant number is restricted to less than 1, the accuracy is maintained, and the cost becomes similar to the dimensionally split scheme.
机译:尺寸分裂的平流计划由于它们在每个空间尺寸的效率和准确性而具有大气建模的吸引力。无需使用磁通形式半拉格朗日技术即可实现准确的长时间步骤。本文中使用的尺寸分割方案由一维分段抛物线方法构成,并使用宇宙分裂延伸到两个维度。将维度分开方案与线路上的真正多维方法进行比较,该方案具有隐含的时间阶梯,对于显着大于1.慢性平面的二维平面测试用例的稳定性,避免球形结构域或多面板网的复杂性。这些是坚固的旋转,水平平流过度,过度平流和变形流动。测试用例使用扭曲的非正交网格来表示倾斜地形或模拟立方球边缘附近的扭曲。网眼扭曲预计会突出与尺寸分裂相关的误差,但尺寸分割方案的准确性在网眼失真的情况下仅减少了一点。当使用长时间步骤时,尺寸分割方案也会丢失一些精度。多维方案几乎完全不敏感以在高分辨率下对二阶精度进行网状失真和渐近。正如预期的隐式时间级步进,在使用长时间步骤时发生相位误差,但是以正确的速度建立空间良好的分辨功能,并且多维方案始终稳定。对计算成本(乘数数量)的天真估计揭示了隐式方案是最昂贵的,特别是对于大的龙头数。如果使用多维方案而是用明确的时间踩踏使用,则扶手数限制为小于1,因此保持精度,并且成本与维度分开方案类似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号