首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison of dimensionally-split and multi-dimensional atmospheric transport schemes for long time-steps
【2h】

Comparison of dimensionally-split and multi-dimensional atmospheric transport schemes for long time-steps

机译:长时间步长上的分流和多维大气传输方案的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Dimensionally split advection schemes are attractive for atmospheric modelling due to their efficiency and accuracy in each spatial dimension. Accurate long time steps can be achieved without significant cost using the flux-form semi-Lagrangian technique. The dimensionally split scheme used in this paper is constructed from the one-dimensional Piecewise Parabolic Method and extended to two dimensions using COSMIC splitting. The dimensionally split scheme is compared with a genuinely multi-dimensional, method of lines scheme which, with implicit time-stepping, is stable for Courant numbers significantly larger than one.ududTwo-dimensional advection test cases on Cartesian planes are proposed that avoid the complexities of a spherical domain or multi-panel meshes. These are solid body rotation, horizontal advection over orography and deformational flow. The test cases use distorted non-orthogonal meshes either to represent sloping terrain or to mimic the distortions near cubed-sphere edges.ududMesh distortions are expected to accentuate the errors associated with dimension splitting, however, the accuracy of the dimensionally split scheme decreases only a little in the presence of mesh distortions. The dimensionally split scheme also loses some accuracy when long time-steps are used. The multi-dimensional scheme is almost entirely insensitive to mesh distortions and asymptotes to second-order accuracy at high resolution. As is expected for implicit time-stepping, phase errors occur when using long time-steps but the spatially well-resolved features are advected at the correct speed and the multi-dimensional scheme is always stable.ududA naive estimate of computational cost (number of multiplies) reveals that the implicit scheme is the most expensive, particularly for large Courant numbers. If the multi-dimensional scheme is used instead with explicit time-stepping, the Courant number is restricted to less than one, the accuracy is maintained and the cost becomes similar to the dimensionally split scheme.
机译:由于在每个空间维度上的效率和准确性,按维度划分的对流方案对大气建模很有吸引力。使用磁通形式的半拉格朗日技术,无需花费大量成本即可实现准确的长时间步长。本文使用的维分解方案是从一维分段抛物线方法构造的,并使用COSMIC分裂扩展到二维。将尺寸划分方案与真正的多维线法方案进行比较,该方案采用隐式时间步长,对于库兰特数明显大于1的情况稳定。 ud ud在笛卡尔平面上进行二维对流测试案例避免使用球形域或多面板网格的复杂性。这些是固体旋转,地形上的水平对流和变形流。测试用例使用变形的非正交网格来表示倾斜的地形或模拟立方体球体边缘附近的变形。 ud ud网格变形会加剧与尺寸分割相关的误差,但是,尺寸分割方案的准确性在存在网格变形的情况下仅减小一点。当使用较长的时间步长时,维分解方案也会失去一些准确性。多维方案几乎对网格变形完全不敏感,并且在高分辨率下渐近于二阶精度。正如隐式时间步长所预期的那样,当使用较长的时间步长时会发生相位误差,但是以正确的速度平移空间上分辨率良好的特征,并且多维方案始终是稳定的。 (乘法数)表明,隐式方案最昂贵,尤其是对于较大的库兰特数。如果使用多维方案代替显式的时间步长,则将Courant数限制为小于1,保持精度,并且成本变得与多维拆分方案相似。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号