首页> 外文期刊>Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior >The design, implementation, and evaluation of online credit nutrition courses: a systematic review.
【24h】

The design, implementation, and evaluation of online credit nutrition courses: a systematic review.

机译:在线信用营养课程的设计,实施和评估:系统回顾。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objective: To assess how postsecondary online nutrition education courses (ONEC) are delivered, determine ONEC effectiveness, identify theoretical models used, and identify future research needs. Design: Systematic search of database literature. Setting: Postsecondary education. Participants: Nine research articles evaluating postsecondary ONEC. Main Outcome Measures: Knowledge/performance outcomes and student satisfaction, motivation, or perceptions. Analysis: Systematic search of 922 articles and review of 9 articles meeting search criteria. Results: Little research regarding ONEC marketing/management existed. Studies primarily evaluated introductory courses using email/websites (before 2000), or course management systems (after 2002). None used true experimental designs; just 3 addressed validity or reliability of measures or pilot-tested instruments. Three articles used theoretical models in course design; few used theories to guide evaluations. Four quasi-experimental studies indicated no differences in nutrition knowledge/performance between online and face-to-face learners. Results were inconclusive regarding student satisfaction, motivation, or perceptions. Conclusions and Implications: Students can gain knowledge in online as well as in face-to-face nutrition courses, but satisfaction was mixed. More up-to-date investigations on effective practices are warranted, using theories to identify factors that enhance student outcomes, addressing emerging technologies, and documenting ONEC marketing, management, and delivery. Adequate training/support for faculty is needed to improve student experiences and faculty time management.Digital Object Identifier http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.04.001
机译:目的:评估如何提供中学后在线营养教育课程(ONEC),确定ONEC的有效性,确定使用的理论模型以及确定未来的研究需求。设计:系统搜索数据库文献。地点:专上教育。参与者:九篇评估中学后ONEC的研究文章。主要成果指标:知识/表现成果和学生满意度,动力或看法。分析:系统搜索922条文章,并审查9条符合搜索条件的文章。结果:关于ONEC营销/管理的研究很少。研究主要使用电子邮件/网站(2000年之前)或课程管理系统(2002年之后)评估入门课程。没有人使用真正的实验设计。只有3个提到了措施或经过试验测试的仪器的有效性或可靠性。三篇文章在课程设计中使用了理论模型;很少有人用理论来指导评估。四项准实验研究表明,在线学习者和面对面学习者的营养知识/表现没有差异。关于学生的满意度,动机或看法,结果尚无定论。结论和启示:学生可以在网上以及面对面的营养课程中获得知识,但满意度却参差不齐。需要对有效的实践进行更多的最新调查,使用理论来识别可提高学生学习成绩的因素,解决新兴技术并记录ONEC的营销,管理和交付情况。需要为教职员工提供足够的培训/支持以改善学生体验和教职时间管理。数字对象标识符http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jneb.2010.04.001

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号