...
首页> 外文期刊>The Review of Economic Studies >Cheap Talk in the Classroom: How Biased Grading at School Explains Gender Differences in Achievements, Career Choices and Wages
【24h】

Cheap Talk in the Classroom: How Biased Grading at School Explains Gender Differences in Achievements, Career Choices and Wages

机译:课堂上的廉价谈话:学校的偏见评分如何解释成就,职业选择和工资方面的性别差异

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In this paper, I provide a theoretical explanation for the gender differences in education and on the labour market that are observed empirically in most OECD (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development) countries, including the US Within a cheap talk model of grading, I show that biased grading in schools results in (1) boys outperforming girls in maths and sciences, (2) boys having more top and more bottom achievers in maths and sciences than girls, (3) girls outperforming boys in reading literacy, (4) female graduates enrolling in university studies more often than male graduates, (5) the predominance of female students in arts and humanities at the university, (6) the predominance of male students in maths and sciences at the university and (7) the gender wage gap on the labour market for the highly educated.
机译:在本文中,我提供了在包括美国在内的大多数OECD(经济合作与发展组织)国家/地区通过经验观察到的教育和劳动力市场上的性别差异的理论解释,我展示了一种廉价的分级评分模型在学校中有偏见的成绩导致(1)在数学和科学方面的男孩表现优于女孩;(2)在数学和科学方面,男孩的成就和成就均高于女孩;(3)在识字能力方面女孩的表现优于男孩;(4)女性进入大学学习的毕业生比男性毕业生更为频繁;(5)在艺术和人文科学领域中,女学生占主导地位;(6)在大学的数学和科学领域中,男学生占主导地位;(7)性别工资差距在劳动力市场上受过高等教育的人。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号