首页> 外文期刊>The Journal of continuing education in the health professions >Social interaction and participation: formative evaluation of online CME modules.
【24h】

Social interaction and participation: formative evaluation of online CME modules.

机译:社交互动和参与:在线CME模块的形成性评估。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: This exploratory study examines Canadian physicians' participation in online social activities and learning discussions, perceptions of online social closeness, barriers and motivators to participation, and perceptions of the impact of course duration and face-to-face meetings on learning. METHODS: Formative evaluations were administrated to physicians participating in two online continuing medical education (CME) courses. Responses were recorded and calculated by the Blackboard Learning System. Content analysis was used to categorize comments and identify influencing factors. Online postings were counted to measure participation in the learning activities. RESULTS: The participation rate of 158 physicians and 10 facilitators in online social activities was very low. Forty-five percent of responding participants reported that more time for discussion would help them learn more; 62% stated that the initial face-to-face meeting helped improve online social relations and increase peer interactions online. Thirty-five percent of respondents reported participating in online social activities, while 29% had no time to do so, and 18% were not interested in doing so. Thirty-five percent felt closer or more connected to their peers after two discussion sessions; 11% did not feel closer because of their low participation; and 16% did not feel closer because of inadequate peer interaction. On the two evaluations, 49% and 22% of respondents, respectively, perceived lack of time and social bonding as major barriers to participating in learning discussion. DISCUSSION: Lack of time and peer response were given as the main reasons for low participation in social activity and learning discussions. Time and social bonding were major barriers to learning discussion. Course usefulness and participants' desire, commitment, and time management skills helped overcome barriers. Facilitators needed training in online systems and facilitation skills. Longer course duration and realistic pacing would probably foster more social interaction and greater course participation.
机译:简介:这项探索性研究调查了加拿大医师对在线社交活动和学习讨论的参与,对在线社交亲密感的认识,参与的障碍和动机,以及对课程持续时间和面对面会议对学习的影响的认识。方法:对参加两个在线继续医学教育(CME)课程的医师进行了形成性评估。答案由Blackboard Learning System记录和计算。内容分析用于对评论进行分类并确定影响因素。在线发布被计数以衡量学习活动的参与度。结果:158位医生和10位主持人对在线社交活动的参与率非常低。 45%的受访者表示,更多的讨论时间可以帮助他们学习更多; 62%的人表示,最初的面对面会议有助于改善在线社交关系并增加在线同伴互动。 35%的受访者表示参加了在线社交活动,而29%的人没有时间参加,而18%的人对此不感兴趣。经过两次讨论后,有35%的人感到与同伴之间的联系越来越紧密; 11%的人由于参与度低而感到不亲近; 16%的人由于同伴之间的互动不足而感到不亲近。在这两项评估中,分别有49%和22%的受访者认为缺乏时间和社交联系是参加学习讨论的主要障碍。讨论:缺乏时间和同伴的反应是社会活动和学习讨论参与度低的主要原因。时间和社交联系是学习讨论的主要障碍。课程的有用性以及参与者的愿望,承诺和时间管理技能有助于克服障碍。主持人需要在线系统和协助技巧方面的培训。更长的课程持续时间和现实的节奏可能会促进更多的社交互动和更多的课程参与。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号