首页> 外文期刊>Educational Studies in Mathematics >How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions
【24h】

How reform curricula in the USA and Korea present multiplication and division of fractions

机译:美国和韩国的改革课程如何呈现分数的乘法和除法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In order to give insights into cross-national differences in schooling, this study analyzed the development of multiplication and division of fractions in two curricula: Everyday Mathematics (EM) from the USA and the 7th Korean mathematics curriculum (KM). Analyses of both the content and problems in the textbooks indicate that multiplication of fractions is developed in KM one semester earlier than in EM. However, the number of lessons devoted to the topic is similar in the two curricula. In contrast, division of fractions is developed at about the same time in both curricula, but due to different beliefs about the importance of the topic, KM contains five times as many lessons and about eight times as many problems about division of fractions as EM. Both curricula provide opportunities to develop conceptual understanding and procedural fluency. However, in EM, conceptual understanding is developed first followed by procedural fluency, whereas in KM, they are developed simultaneously. The majority of fraction multiplication and division problems in both curricula requires only procedural knowledge. However, multistep computational problems are more common in KM than in EM, and the response types are also more varied in KM.
机译:为了深入了解跨国教育差异,本研究分析了两个课程中分数的乘法和除法的发展:美国的日常数学(EM)和第七届韩国数学课程(KM)。对教科书内容和问题的分析表明,KM的分数乘法要比EM的早一个学期。但是,在两个课程中,专门针对该主题的课程数量是相似的。相比之下,两种课程的分数划分都是在同一时间进行的,但是由于对主题重要性的看法不同,知识管理所包含的课程和分数问题的数量是EM的五倍和八倍。两种课程都提供了发展概念理解和程序流畅性的机会。但是,在EM中,首先要发展概念性理解,然后才是程序流畅性,而在KM中,它们是同时发展的。两种课程中大多数分数乘法和除法问题都只需要程序知识。但是,多步计算问题在KM中比在EM中更为常见,并且响应类型在KM中也更加多样化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号