首页> 外文期刊>Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education >Academic practice as explanatory framework: reconceptualising international student academic engagement and university teaching
【24h】

Academic practice as explanatory framework: reconceptualising international student academic engagement and university teaching

机译:以学术实践为解释框架:重新概念化国际学生的学术参与和大学教学

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

This paper joins growing interest in the concept of practice, and uses it to reconceptualise international student engagement with the demands of study at an Australian university. Practice foregrounds institutional structures and student agency and brings together psychologically- and socially-oriented perspectives on international student learning approaches. Utilising discourse theory, practice is defined as habitual and individual instances of socially-contextualised configurations of elements such as actions and interactions, roles and relations, identities, objects, values, and language. In the university context, academic practice highlights the institutionally-sanctioned ways of knowing, doing and being that constitute academic tasks. The concept is applied here to six international students' ‘readings’ of and strategic responses to academic work in a Master of Education course. It is argued that academic practice provides a comprehensive framework for explaining the interface between university academic requirements and international student learning, and the crucial role that teaching has in facilitating the experience.View full textDownload full textKeywordspractice, international students, higher education, second-language learning, learning strategies, critical discourse analysisRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.537067
机译:本文与实践概念的兴趣日益浓厚,并用它来重新构想国际学生对澳大利亚大学学习要求的参与。实践着重于体制结构和学生代理,并就国际学生的学习方法汇集了以心理学和社会为导向的观点。利用话语理论,实践被定义为习惯性和个体性实例,这些个体在社交语境下配置元素,例如动作和互动,角色和关系,身份,对象,价值和语言。在大学环境中,学术实践强调了制度认可的知识,行为和存在方式,这些构成了学术任务。该概念在此适用于六个国际学生对教育硕士课程中学术工作的“阅读”和战略性回应。有人认为,学术实践为解释大学学术要求和国际学生学习之间的界面以及教学在促进经验中的关键作用提供了一个全面的框架。查看全文下载全文关键字实践,国际学生,高等教育,第二语言学习,学习策略,批评性话语分析相关var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,servicescompact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,pubid: ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2011.537067

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号