首页> 外文期刊>BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth >Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A comparison of indices
【24h】

Inadequate prenatal care and its association with adverse pregnancy outcomes: A comparison of indices

机译:产前保健不足及其与不良妊娠结局的关联:指标比较

获取原文

摘要

Background The objectives of this study were to determine rates of prenatal care utilization in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada from 1991 to 2000; to compare two indices of prenatal care utilization in identifying the proportion of the population receiving inadequate prenatal care; to determine the association between inadequate prenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcomes (preterm birth, low birth weight [LBW], and small-for-gestational age [SGA]), using each of the indices; and, to assess whether or not, and to what extent, gestational age modifies this association. Methods We conducted a population-based study of women having a hospital-based singleton live birth from 1991 to 2000 (N = 80,989). Data sources consisted of a linked mother-baby database and a physician claims file maintained by Manitoba Health. Rates of inadequate prenatal care were calculated using two indices, the R-GINDEX and the APNCU. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between inadequate prenatal care and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Stratified analysis was then used to determine whether the association between inadequate prenatal care and LBW or SGA differed by gestational age. Results Rates of inadequateo prenatal care ranged from 8.3% using APNCU to 8.9% using R-GINDEX. The association between inadequate prenatal care and preterm birth and LBW varied depending on the index used, with adjusted odds ratios (AOR) ranging from 1.0 to 1.3. In contrast, both indices revealed the same strength of association of inadequate prenatal care with SGA (AOR 1.4). Both indices demonstrated heterogeneity (non-uniformity) across gestational age strata, indicating the presence of effect modification by gestational age. Conclusion Selection of a prenatal care utilization index requires careful consideration of its methodological underpinnings and limitations. The two indices compared in this study revealed different patterns of utilization of prenatal care, and should not be used interchangeably. Use of these indices to study the association between utilization of prenatal care and pregnancy outcomes affected by the duration of pregnancy should be approached cautiously.
机译:背景技术这项研究的目的是确定1991年至2000年加拿大曼尼托巴省温尼伯的产前保健利用率。比较两个产前护理利用率指标,以确定未得到足够产前护理的人口比例;使用每个指标来确定产前保健不足与不良妊娠结局(早产,低出生体重[LBW]和小胎龄[SGA])之间的关联;以及评估胎龄是否会在这种程度上改变这种关联。方法我们对1991年至2000年以医院为基础的单胎活产妇女进行了一项基于人口的研究(N = 80,989)。数据源由一个链接的母婴数据库和一个由Manitoba Health维护的医生索赔文件组成。使用R-GINDEX和APNCU这两个指数来计算产前护理不足的比率。 Logistic回归分析用于确定产前护理不足与不良妊娠结局之间的关联。然后使用分层分析来确定不足的产前护理与LBW或SGA之间的关联是否因胎龄而异。结果不足/没有进行产前检查的比率范围从使用APNCU的8.3%到使用R-GINDEX的8.9%不等。不足的产前护理与早产和LBW之间的关联因所使用的指标而异,调整后的优势比(AOR)为1.0至1.3。相比之下,两个指标都表明,不足的产前护理与SGA的关联强度相同(AOR 1.4)。两项指标均显示了整个胎龄层的异质性(非均匀性),表明存在胎龄对效应的影响。结论选择产前护理利用指数需要仔细考虑其方法论基础和局限性。在这项研究中比较的两个指数显示了产前保健利用的不同模式,因此不应互换使用。应该谨慎地使用这些指数来研究产前保健的利用与受妊娠持续时间影响的妊娠结局之间的关联。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号