首页> 外文期刊>BMC Medical Research Methodology >Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications
【24h】

Response to written feedback of clinical data within a longitudinal study: a qualitative study exploring the ethical implications

机译:在纵向研究中对临床数据的书面反馈的回应:探索伦理意义的定性研究

获取原文

摘要

Background There is a growing ethical imperative to feedback research results to participants but there remains a striking lack of empirical research on how people respond to individualised feedback. We sought to explore longitudinal study participants' response to receiving individual written feedback of weight-related and blood results, and to consider the balance of harms against benefits. Methods A qualitative study with face-to-face and telephone interviews conducted with 50 men and women who had participated in the fifth and most recent wave of the cohort study 'West of Scotland Twenty-07' and received a feedback letter containing body mass index (BMI), body fat percentage, cholesterol and glycated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) results. Results Expectations of, and response to, the feedback of their individual results varied. Whilst half of the participants were on the whole 'pleased' with their results or held neutral views, half reported negative responses such as 'shock' or 'concern', particularly in relation to the weight-related results. Participants who were overweight and obese used the most negative language about their results, with some being quite distressed and reporting feelings of powerlessness, low self-image and anxiety over future health. Nevertheless, some people reported having implemented lifestyle changes in direct response to the feedback, resulting in significant weight-loss and/or dietary improvements. Others reported being motivated to change their behaviour. Age and gender differences were apparent in these narratives of behaviour change. Conclusions The potential harm caused to some participants may be balanced against the benefit to others. More evaluation of the impact of the format, content and means of individualised feedback of research findings in non-trial studies is required given the growing ethical imperative to offer participants a choice of receiving their results, and the likelihood that a high percentage will choose to receive them.
机译:背景技术向参与者反馈研究结果的道德要求越来越高,但是仍然缺乏关于人们如何回应个性化反馈的经验研究。我们试图探讨纵向研究参与者对收到有关体重和血液结果的书面反馈的反应,并考虑伤害与收益之间的平衡。方法:对50名男女进行了定性研究,他们进行了面对面和电话访谈,他们参加了第五次也是最近一波的“ Western Scotland 20th-07”队列研究,并收到了包含体重指数的反馈信(BMI),体脂百分比,胆固醇和糖化血红蛋白A 1c (HbA 1 c )结果。结果对个人结果反馈的期望和反应各不相同。一半的参与者总体上对结果表示“满意”或持中立看法,而另一半则表示负面反应,例如“震惊”或“关注”,尤其是与体重相关的结果。超重和肥胖的参与者对其结果使用了最负面的语言,有些人非常沮丧,并报告了无能为力,自我形象低落和对未来健康的焦虑感。但是,有些人报告说,他们已经对生活方式做出了改变,以直接响应反馈,从而导致体重明显减轻和/或饮食得到改善。其他人则表示有动力改变自己的行为。在这些行为改变的叙述中,年龄和性别差异是显而易见的。结论对某些参与者造成的潜在危害可以与对其他参与者的利益相平衡。鉴于越来越多的道德要求为参与者提供选择接收其结果的可能性以及高百分比的人选择接受研究的可能性,因此需要对非试验研究中研究结果的个性化反馈的格式,内容和手段的影响进行更多评估。接收它们。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号