...
首页> 外文期刊>Computer assisted language learning >Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision
【24h】

Blog-based peer response for L2 writing revision

机译:基于博客的L2写作修订的同行响应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Few studies have been conducted to see how blog-based peer response helps students to improve their writing revisions. The present study investigates peer comments made through blogs, the nature of the comments and their areas of focus, and the ratios of students incorporating suggestions made through blog-based comments into revisions of their writing. Thirty-two second-year English major students taking a 15-week academic writing course at Nong Lam University in Ho Chi Minh City were selected to participate in this study. The students posted their writings on blogs and, through blog comments, also provided and received suggestions for revision. The results indicated that though the comments on global areas were greater than those on local areas, the qualified comments (revision-oriented comments) were not guaranteed to be greater in the global area. The total revisions made during blog-based peer response were greater than the total revision-oriented comments delivered by peers. In addition, revisions at lower levels such as word or phrase needed less help from peers, whereas those at higher levels such as sentence or paragraph needed more help from peers. The study brings illumination for instructors who are considering whether to apply blogs to their writing classes.
机译:很少进行研究来了解基于博客的同伴反应如何帮助学生提高写作水平。本研究调查通过博客发表的同龄人评论,评论的性质及其关注的领域,以及将通过基于博客的评论提出的建议纳入其写作修订中的学生比例。选择了32名在胡志明市农林大学学习15周学术写作课程的英语专业二年级学生参加了这项研究。学生们将自己的作品发表在博客上,并通过博客评论提供并收到修改建议。结果表明,尽管对全球区域的评论要多于对局部区域的评论,但不能保证合格的评论(面向修订的评论)在全球范围内会更大。在基于博客的对等方响应期间进行的修订总数大于对等方提供的针对修订的注释总数。此外,较低级别的修订(例如单词或短语)需要同行的帮助较少,而较高级别的修订(例如句子或段落)则需要同行的帮助。该研究为正在考虑是否在其写作课程中应用博客的讲师提供启发。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号