首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A methodology for cross-national comparative focus group research: illustrations from discussions about political protest
【2h】

A methodology for cross-national comparative focus group research: illustrations from discussions about political protest

机译:跨国比较焦点小组研究的方法:关于政治抗议的讨论中的插图

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We propose a methodology for comparative cross-national focus group research and illustrate how this methodology is useful for advancing our understanding of political protest. Focus group research allows researchers to study the collective process of meaning making and formation of intersubjective attitudes. This process has been shown to be relevant for how people discuss politics, and how in turn it could influence participation in politics. However, a systematic methodology for examining the influence of the historical, social, and political context in different countries has not been developed hitherto. In order to allow for comparisons between the formation of attitudes in different countries, we put forward several methodological decisions aimed at achieving standardization in cross-national focus group research design. Group composition, recruitment strategies, and moderation style are the key facets of focus group research that need to be standardized in order to make meaningful cross-national comparisons, but more practical considerations in implementing focus groups cross-nationally are also discussed. We illustrate and critically assess the proposed methodology based on data from an international comparative research project in which 80 focus groups were conducted in nine different countries in Europe and Latin America.
机译:我们提出了一种用于跨国跨国焦点小组研究的方法,并说明了该方法如何有助于增进我们对政治抗议的理解。焦点小组研究使研究人员能够研究意义形成和主体间态度形成的集体过程。事实证明,这一过程与人们讨论政治以及如何影响政治参与有关。但是,迄今尚未开发出一种系统的方法来检查历史,社会和政治环境在不同国家的影响。为了在不同国家的态度形成之间进行比较,我们提出了一些旨在实现跨国焦点小组研究设计标准化的方法学决策。小组组成,招聘策略和节制方式是焦点小组研究的关键方面,需要进行标准化才能进行有意义的跨国比较,但同时也讨论了在跨国实施焦点小组时应考虑的更多实际问题。我们根据一项国际比较研究项目的数据来说明和批判性地评估所提议的方法,该项目在欧洲和拉丁美洲的9个不同国家进行了80个焦点小组的研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号