首页> 外文期刊>Journal of communication >Cross-National Differences in Political Discussion: Can Political Systems Narrow Deliberation Gaps?
【24h】

Cross-National Differences in Political Discussion: Can Political Systems Narrow Deliberation Gaps?

机译:政治讨论中的跨国分歧:政治制度能否缩小审议差距?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Even though many researchers devoted considerable attention to political discussion and its individual-level antecedents and outcomes, insights are based on single-country studies. Cross-national variations were either never studied or implicitly equated to the U.S. context. This study integrates explanations from communication and comparative politics to test whether political system features (e.g., electoral competitiveness and multiple parties) affect the macrosupply of political information, and thus either amplify or diminish the effects of individual characteristics on discussion. Analyses of cross-national data show system features correlate with greater discussion frequency and moderate the contribution of individual differences to discussion. The potential of systems to narrow gaps in mass public discussion and implications for future research are considered in conclusion.
机译:尽管许多研究人员对政治讨论及其各个层面的前因和结果投入了相当多的关注,但见解还是基于单个国家的研究。从未研究过跨国差异或将其隐含地等同于美国的情况。这项研究综合了传播政治学和比较政治学的解释,以检验政治制度特征(例如选举竞争力和多党制)是否会影响政治信息的宏观供给,从而扩大或减少个人特征对讨论的影响。跨国数据分析表明,系统特征与更大的讨论频率相关,并减轻了个人差异对讨论的影响。总结认为,该系统有可能缩小公众讨论中的空白及其对未来研究的影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Journal of communication》 |2012年第3期|p.553-570|共18页
  • 作者

    Lilach Nir;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Communication, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 91905 Jerusalem, Israel Department of Political Science, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Mount Scopus, 91905 Jerusalem, Israel;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号