首页> 外文学位 >Methodological and theoretical issues in cross-national comparative studies of psychosocial job hazards: From questionnaire item to social class.
【24h】

Methodological and theoretical issues in cross-national comparative studies of psychosocial job hazards: From questionnaire item to social class.

机译:跨国社会心理工作危害比较研究中的方法论和理论问题:从问卷调查项目到社会阶层。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There has been little concern, among international work and health researchers, for methodological and theoretical issues that are critical for the validity of international comparison studies of perceived psychosocial job hazards. In this study, two methodological issues were addressed: internal and external consistencies of the five psychological demands items of the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) as a scale for practical use; differential understanding of JCQ items among different cultures and its impact on the scale-level cross-cultural mean comparisons. One important theoretical debate was also addressed: the relationship between socioeconomic status (SES) and job strain of Karasek's Demand-Control model. Multidimensional structures of the five items were identified. In some sub-samples of a dataset, several significant correlations of the components of the psychological demands scale with job dissatisfaction and life dissatisfaction were obscured by the full scale. On average, 34.0% to 39.5% of the total tested items turned out to be understood differentially between cultures. The psychological demands and supervisor support scales of the JCQ were the most affected. The impact of the differential item functioning on the scale-level mean comparisons was minor generally, but some of the findings have implications for a robust international comparison. The orthogonal relationship between SES and job strain was generally supported, if not in all of the datasets tested. The proportion of variance in minor mental disorders explained by job strain (on average, 7% for males and 5% for females) was much higher than that by SES (less than 1%). However, significant indirect effects of SES on mental disorders via psychosocial job hazards were also identified in some female samples. A more robust theoretical framework of work demands should be developed. A stricter translation process needs to be employed for effective cross-cultural adaptation of JCQ items. More diverse SES indicators and more objective psychosocial job characteristics/health outcomes in representative and longitudinal datasets need to be employed for the debate. Nonetheless, this study implies that work quality policy could bring major improvement of daily worker's mental health in the working populations of industrialized countries.
机译:在国际工作和卫生研究人员中,很少有人关注方法和理论问题,这些问题对于感知到的社会心理工作危害的国际比较研究的有效性至关重要。在这项研究中,解决了两个方法问题:工作内容问卷(JCQ)的五个心理需求项目的内部和外部一致性,作为实际使用的量表;不同文化之间对JCQ项目的不同理解及其对规模水平跨文化均值比较的影响。还讨论了一项重要的理论辩论:社会经济地位(SES)与Karasek需求控制模型的工作压力之间的关系。确定了五个项目的多维结构。在数据集的一些子样本中,心理需求量表的各个组成部分与工作不满和生活不满之间的几种显着相关性被完整量表所掩盖。事实证明,平均而言,在所有测试项目中有34.0%至39.5%的理解是不同的。 JCQ的心理需求和主管支持量表受到的影响最大。一般而言,差异项功能对量表水平均值比较的影响较小,但是某些发现对稳健的国际比较具有影响。如果不是在所有测试的数据集中,SES和工作压力之间的正交关系通常都得到支持。用工作压力解释的轻度精神障碍的差异比例(平均为7%,男性为5%,女性为5%)远高于SES(小于1%)。但是,在某些女性样本中,SES还通过心理社会工作危害对精神障碍产生了显着的间接影响。应该建立一个更强大的工作需求理论框架。需要使用更严格的翻译过程,以有效地跨文化适应JCQ项目。辩论中需要采用代表性和纵向数据集中更多样化的SES指标和更客观的心理社会工作特征/健康结果。但是,这项研究表明,工作质量政策可以在工业化国家的劳动人口中极大地改善日常工人的心理健康。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号