首页> 外文学位 >The professional development of teachers involved in collaborative curriculum change: The case of New Basic Education Project in Shanghai.
【24h】

The professional development of teachers involved in collaborative curriculum change: The case of New Basic Education Project in Shanghai.

机译:参与合作课程变更的教师的专业发展:以上海新基础教育项目为例。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Although teacher professional development has been widely studied in English-speaking countries during the last two decades, few researches are conducted based on the context of Mainland China. Taking a university-school collaborative curriculum change project (New Basic Education Project) as a case, this exploratory research aims to investigate (a) on what bases (e.g., routines and procedures in schools, teachers' daily professional activities) and (b) how teachers participating in this project gain professional development, and (c) what changes teachers may experience during the process of curriculum change under the educational context of Mainland China.;New Basic Education Project was initiated by several university educators and teachers from a primary school in 1994 in Shanghai and extended to more than 30 schools in Shanghai five years later. One of the most important aims of this project is to change the students' classroom lives by changing teachers.;Multiple methods of data collection were adopted in this qualitative study: (1) The researcher spent two months in the project field observing the procedures and activities in the change process, including teaching observation, university educator and peer reviewing, group discussion and meetings. Field notes were taken during the process of observation. (2) Documents including newsletters, reports, journals, and articles written by university educators and teachers were collected. (3) 13 teachers and 8 principals (including vice principals) from 5 schools, 6 university educators and 3 teaching researchers were interviewed, all of the interviews were recorded.;All the interview records were transcribed and were read repeatedly along with field notes and documents. Themes, comments and ideas emerging during this period were written down and acted as guidelines for further data-analysis. At last the themes were categorized and sequenced into the final report.;The study finds that (a) principals and teachers hold different expectations and have different understandings of the project with university educators, (b) routines, rules and widely shared standards in schools play an important role in the way principals and teachers interpret and treat the change, (c) even after participating in the project for a rather long period of time, participant teachers are still not sure what the change is about and what does it mean to their daily professional activities.;Detailed description of participant teachers' daily professional activities and strategies employed in the project to enhance change is given in this report. Participant teachers report a wide range of change during the project, including (a) receptivity of the project, (b) needs and motivation, (c) degree of openness, (d) habits and ability to reflect, (e) education conceptions, and (f) teaching behavior. The study also finds that positive changes happening on students may be the main reason why teachers finally accept the project and tend to continue the project.
机译:尽管在过去的二十年中,英语国家的教师专业发展得到了广泛的研究,但很少根据中国大陆的情况进行研究。以大学与学校的合作课程改革项目(新基础教育项目)为例,该探索性研究旨在调查(a)基于什么基础(例如,学校的日常活动和程序,教师的日常专业活动)以及(b)参与该项目的教师如何获得专业发展,以及(c)在中国大陆的教育背景下,教师在课程改革过程中可能会遇到什么变化。新的基础教育项目是由几所大学教育者和一所小学的教师发起的1994年在上海,五年后扩展到上海的30余所学校。该项目的最重要目标之一是通过更换老师来改变学生的课堂生活。;该定性研究采用了多种数据收集方法:(1)研究人员在项目现场花了两个月的时间观察程序和变革过程中的活动,包括教学观察,大学教育者和同行评审,小组讨论和会议。在观察过程中记录了实地记录。 (2)收集了新闻通讯,报告,期刊和大学教育者和教师撰写的文章。 (3)采访了来自5所学校的13位教师和8位校长(包括副校长),6位大学教育者和3位教学研究人员,记录了所有访谈记录;所有访谈记录都被抄录并与田野笔记和笔记一起反复阅读文件。写下了在此期间出现的主题,评论和想法,并作为进一步数据分析的指南。最终,主题被归类并编入最终报告。研究发现(a)校长和老师对项目的期望与大学教育工作者不同,对项目的理解也不同;(b)学校的惯例,规则和广泛共享的标准在校长和教师解释和对待变更的方式中起着重要作用,(c)即使参与了相当长的一段时间后,参与教师仍然不确定变更的含义和含义。他们的日常专业活动。;本报告详细介绍了参与教师在项目中采用的日常专业活动和策略,以促进变革。参与教师报告了项目进行期间的广泛变化,包括(a)项目的接受程度,(b)需求和动机,(c)开放程度,(d)反映的习惯和能力,(e)教育观念, (f)教学行为。研究还发现,学生身上发生的积极变化可能是教师最终接受该项目并倾向于继续该项目的主要原因。

著录项

  • 作者

    Wang, Jianjun.;

  • 作者单位

    The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Education Teacher Training.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2002
  • 页码 247 p.
  • 总页数 247
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:46:33

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号