首页> 外文会议>International Conference on Science and Applied Science >Effects of cognitive conflict and scientific approach on students' alternative conceptions and scientific literacy levels regarding characteristics of mechanical waves
【24h】

Effects of cognitive conflict and scientific approach on students' alternative conceptions and scientific literacy levels regarding characteristics of mechanical waves

机译:认知冲突与科学方式对学生替代概念的影响,以及关于机械波特征的替代概念和科学识字水平

获取原文

摘要

This research aims to describe students' alternative conceptions and scientific literacy levels in characteristics of mechanical waves after getting cognitive conflict and scientific approach learning. The research method is experimental with two experimental groups and one control group. The experimental group using cognitive conflict approach and control group using scientific approach. The subject of this study 11th science students of SMAN 1 Karanganyar. The instrument used is a four-tier wave diagnostic instrument given at pre-test and post-test. Data analyzed using qualitative and quantitative analysis. Qualitative analysis obtained through classification ofstudents' answer into suitable categories. Quantitative analysis obtained through calculation of Mann Whitney test and N-gain. The result show increasing of students' scientific conceptions and conceptual/ procedural literacy in first experimental group from 0%-50% become 0%-66,7%, in second experimental group from 0%-55,6% become 2,8%-75%, and in control group from 0%-62,5% become 5%-87,5%. Based on Mann Whitney test result can be concluded there is a significant difference between post-test scores of experimental and control groups. Average value of n-gain in the first experimental group is 0,3 with category medium, in the second experimental group is 0,27 with category low, and in control group is 0,44 with category medium. Therefore, both cognitive conflict and scientific approach can increase students' understanding and scientific literacy levels. N-gain scores for the control group is highest means the increase of students' understanding using scientific approach higher than students' understanding using cognitive conflict learning.
机译:该研究旨在在获得认知冲突和科学方法学习后描述学生的机械波特征的替代概念和科学识字水平。研究方法是实验性,两组实验组和一个对照组。使用科学方法使用认知冲突方法和对照组的实验组。本研究第11届Sman Scen Scients 1 Karanganyar的主题。使用的仪器是在预测试和后测试时给出的四层波诊断仪器。使用定性和定量分析分析的数据。通过对合适类别的答案进行分类获得的定性分析。通过计算Mann Whitney试验和N-GAIN获得的定量分析。结果表明,学生的科学观念和概念性/程序识字在第一个实验组中,从0%-50%变为0%-66,7%,在0%-55,6%的第二个实验组中变为2,8% -75%,对照组0%-62,5%变为5%-87,5%。基于Mann Whitney试验结果,可以得出结论,实验和对照组的测试后分数之间存在显着差异。在第一实验组中N-GAIN的平均值为0.3分类培养基,在第二个实验组中为0.27类,对照组为0.44类别介质。因此,认知冲突和科学方法都可以提高学生的理解和科学素养水平。对照组的N-AIG分数最高意味着使用科学方法的学生了解高于使用认知冲突学习的理解。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号