经尿道前列腺电气化术

经尿道前列腺电气化术的相关文献在2000年到2021年内共计106篇,主要集中在外科学、临床医学、肿瘤学 等领域,其中期刊论文105篇、会议论文1篇、专利文献215913篇;相关期刊72种,包括中国保健、解放军护理杂志、齐鲁护理杂志等; 相关会议1种,包括全国第十届手术室护理学术交流暨专题讲座会议等;经尿道前列腺电气化术的相关文献由285位作者贡献,包括单玉喜、孙传洋、徐伟等。

经尿道前列腺电气化术—发文量

期刊论文>

论文:105 占比:0.05%

会议论文>

论文:1 占比:0.00%

专利文献>

论文:215913 占比:99.95%

总计:216019篇

经尿道前列腺电气化术—发文趋势图

经尿道前列腺电气化术

-研究学者

  • 单玉喜
  • 孙传洋
  • 徐伟
  • 颜纯海
  • 刘成倍
  • 叶敏
  • 吴毅
  • 周益龙
  • 安杰
  • 张国田

经尿道前列腺电气化术

-相关会议

  • 期刊论文
  • 会议论文
  • 专利文献

搜索

排序:

学科

年份

    • 张建民
    • 摘要: 老朽今年85岁,身体基本健康。两年前,我因前列腺增生引发排尿困难,在憋尿数小时后住进了本地一家医院。医师为我多次插管导尿不成后,施行了经尿道前列腺电气化术,临床治愈了排尿困难。人呀,不经一事,不长一智。经历了临床多次从尿道和膀胱插管导尿的痛苦,又品味了手术台上满耳"吱吱"切割声的滋味,为了不再受病痛折磨。
    • 焦建伟; 王慧真; 乔光华
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨益肾逐瘀汤联合经尿道前列腺电气化术治疗前列腺增生症的临床效果.方法 选取我院2018年9月至2020年3月收治的前列腺增生症患者80例,依据治疗方法将其分为对照组和观察组,每组40例.对照组行经尿道前列腺电气化术治疗,观察组在对照组基础上给予益肾逐瘀汤.比较两组治疗前、后的最大尿流率、IPSS评分、残余尿量和肾功能指标,分析并发症发生情况.结果 治疗后,观察组的最大尿流率大于对照组,IPSS评分低于对照组,残余尿量少于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).观察组的并发症总发生率明显低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05).治疗后,两组的SCr、BUN水平均降低,GFR均升高,且观察组优于对照组(P<0.05).结论 益肾逐瘀汤联合经尿道前列腺电气化术治疗前列腺增生症具有术后恢复快、安全性好、并发症发生率低等优点,值得临床推广.
    • 胡敏
    • 摘要: 目的:总结高危前腺增生经尿道前列腺电气化术(TURP)的护理体会.方法:选择110例高危前列腺增生(BPH)经TURP患者为研究对象,均为2017年6月至2020年1月于我院择期手术,围手术期予以患者精心护理,包括心理支持、术前准备、生命体征及病情观察、合并症预防以及出院指导等.结果:110例患者手术均顺利完成,2例患者24h内出血,电凝止血效果满意;1例冠心病患者术后出现心律不齐,如ICU严格监控2d后返回普通病房,所有患者住院9~17d后痊愈出院,术后随访6~12个月,1例患者激发尿潴留、出血,经膀胱冲洗、抗感染、止血治疗后治愈.结论:规范化、系统化的护理对于接受TURP治疗的高危BPH患者意义重大,有利于提高手术效果,减少手术并发症,促进患者康复.
    • 徐水
    • 摘要: 目的 比较同期微创术与分期微创术治疗前列腺增生合并中下段输尿管结石的治疗效果.方法 选取兰溪市人民医院2016年8月至2017年8月收治的前列腺增生合并输尿管下段结石患者76例为观察对象,采用随机数字表法分为对照组与观察组各38例,对照组采取分期微创术治疗,观察组则给予同期微创术治疗,比较两组手术情况,统计两组术后7d并发症发生情况,观察两组患者术前、术后3个月的前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量评分(QOL)、残余尿量(RU)、最大尿流率(MFR)的变化情况,术后3个月时调查患者对于治疗的满意程度.结果 观察组和对照组术中出血量分别为(101.29±10.01) mL和(187.62±11.69)mL,手术总用时分别为(140.12±9.81)min和(163.98±10.07) min,住院时间分别为(8.12±0.73)d和(13.49±1.21)d,差异均有统计学意义(t=34.579、10.462、23.425,均P<0.05).治疗前两组患者的MFR、RU、IPSS、QOL差异均无统计学意义(均P>0.05);治疗后对照组和观察组患者MFR分别为(19.04±2.17) mL/s和(18.87±2.00) mL/s,RU分别为(30.67±8.19)mL和(29.51±8.06) mL,IPSS分别为(8.47±1.06)分和(8.53±1.02)分,QOL分别为(2.69±0.68)分和(2.58±0.61)分,均显著改善(组内比较t=27.971和28.809,74.327和74.941,33.440和33.670,12.122和14.589,均P<0.05);治疗后两组患者上述各项指标差异均无统计学意义(t=0.352、0.622、0.251、0.742,均P>0.05).术后7d内,观察组并发症总发生率为31.58%(12/38),对照组并发症总发生率为21.05% (8/38),两组差异无统计学意义(x2=1.086,P>0.05).观察组患者满意率为81.58%(31/38),总满意率为97.37%(37/38);对照组患者满意率为47.37%(18/38),总满意率为76.32% (29/38);观察组患者满意度优于对照组(Z=-3.290,P<0.05).结论 同期微创术治疗前列腺增生合并中下段输尿管结石,疗效确切,并可减少术中出血量、缩短手术总用时和住院时间,术后恢复更快,患者满意度更高,值得临床推广.%Objective To compare the efficacy of simultaneous minimally invasive surgery and staged minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with lower ureteral junction.Methods From August 2016 to August 2017,76 cases of BPH complicated with lower ureteral junction in Lanxi People's Hospital were selected.According to random number table method,the patients were randomly divided into control group and observation group.The control group received the stage of minimally invasive treatment,the observation group was treated with minimally invasive surgery.The incidence of complications 7d after operation was observed.Before operation and 3 months after operation,the prostate symptom score (IPSS),quality of life score (QOL),residual urine volume (RU),maximum urinary flow rate (MFR) were observed in the two groups.The patients' satisfaction with the treatment was investigated in the two groups.Results The amount of blood loss,total operation time,hospitalization time of the observation group and control group were (101.29 ± 10.01) mL vs.(187.62 ± 11.69)mL,(140.12 ±9.81)min vs.(163.98 ± 10.07) min,(8.12 ±0.73) d vs.(13.49 ± 1.21) d,the differences were statistically significant (t =34.579,10.462,23.425,all P < 0.05).Before treatment,the MFR,RU,IPSS and QOL between the two groups had no statistically significant differences (all P > 0.05).Mter treatment,the MFR,RU,IPSS and QOL of the control group and observation group were (19.04 ± 2.17) mL/s vs.(18.87 ± 2.04) mL/s,(30.67 ± 8.19) mL vs.(29.51 ± 8.06) mL,(8.47 ± 1.06) points vs.(8.53 ± 1.02) points,(2.69 ± 0.68) points vs.(2.58 ± 0.61) points,the MFR,RU,IPSS and QOL were significantly improved (t =27.971 and 28.809,74.327 and 74.941,33.440 and 33.670,12.122 and 14.589,all P <0.05).After treatment,there were no statistically significant differences in the above indicators between the two groups (t =0.352,0.622,0.251,0.742,all P > 0.05).Postoperative 7 days,the incidence rate of complications of the observation group was 31.58% (12/38),which of the control group was 21.05% (8/38),there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (x2 =1.086,P > 0.05).The satisfaction rate of the observation group was 81.58% (31/38),the total satisfaction rate was 97.37% (37/38).The satisfaction rate of the control group was 47.37% (18/38),and the total satisfaction rate was 76.32% (29/38).The satisfaction of the observation group was better than that of the control group(Z =-3.290,P < 0.05).Conclusion The curative effect of minimally invasive surgery in the treatment of BPH with middle and lower ureteral calculi is exact,and can reduce the amount of bleeding,shorten operation time and total hospitalization time,faster postoperative recovery in patients with higher satisfaction,it is worthy of clinical promotion.
    • 康望妮
    • 摘要: 目的 探讨经尿道前列腺电气化术后实施优质护理对前列腺增生症(BPH)的疗效.方法 选取我院收治的BPH患者160例为研究对象,随机分为对照组(60例)和研究组(100例).两组患者均给予经尿道前列腺电气化术和常规护理,术后对照组实施一般护理,研究组额外给予优质护理.比较两组的疗效、前列腺症状积分及并发症发生情况.结果 研究组患者护理总有效率高于对照组(P=0.009);治疗后,研究组的IPSS评分低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P=0.019);研究组患者术后并发出血、膀胱痉挛和尿失禁的发生率均低于对照组(P<0.05).结论 TUVR术后对患者实施优质护理干预能够减少术后出血、膀胱痉挛和尿失禁的发生,提高治疗效果.
    • 黄卫权
    • 摘要: 目的:观察双极气化治疗前列腺增生的临床疗效及并发症.方法:选取本院收治的前列腺增生患者112例,采取分层法分成两组,观察组采取经尿道双极气化术治疗,对照组采取经尿道前列腺单极气化术治疗,比较两组临床疗效及并发症情况.结果:观察组患者导尿管留置时间 、术中出血量与对照组比较,差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05).观察组患者手术时间 、住院时间均短于对照组,且并发症发生率低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:双极气化治疗前列腺增生效果显著,创伤小,术后并发症少,是理想的手术方法之一.
    • 李建友; 陈鑫; 王胜; 姜浩然; 陈蕊
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨经尿道前列腺电气化术联合钬激光碎石术治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者的临床疗效.方法:选取2014年10月至2016年3月收治的60例前列腺增生合并膀胱结石患者作为研究对象,均行经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)联合钬激光碎石术治疗,观察治疗效果.结果:本组60例患者均一次手术成功,手术平均时间(86.3 ±9.6) min,其中TURP术时间40 ~ 95 min,钬激光碎石术时间10 ~ 36min.术中平均出血量(115.3±16.8) mL,未见TURP综合征、膀胱穿孔及严重感染等并发症.术后仅出现1例暂时性尿失禁,经提肛训练后恢复正常,术后平均住院时间(7.2±0.6)d,术后复查B超膀胱结石清除率100%,术后随访3~18个月,平均PVR降低至(19.3±1.6)mL,平均MRF上升至(15.8 ±3.2) mL/s,平均QOL降低至(2.0±0.3)分,平均IPSS降低至(8.0±1.2)分,术前后上述指标比较差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05).结论:TURP联合钬激光碎石术治疗前列腺增生合并膀胱结石疗效显著,安全性好,值得在临床上推广应用.%Objectives:To investigate the clinical efficacy of transurethral resection of prostate combined with hohnium laser lithotripsy in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stones.Methods:The 60 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stones in our hospital from October 2014 to March 2016 were selected.All the patients were treated with transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) combined with holmium laser lithotripsy.The treatment effect was observed.Results:All the 60 patients were successfully operated.The mean operation time was (86.3 ± 9.6) min,including the TURP of 40 ~95min and holmium laser lithotripsy time of 10 ~36min.The mean intraoperative blood loss were (115.3 ± 16.8) ml.No complications were found such as TURP syndrome,bladder perforation and severe infection.After operation,only 1 case had temporary incontinence,and it returned to normal after exercising levator ani muscle.The average postoperative hospitalization time was (7.2 ± 0.6) d,and after surgery,the removal rate of bladder stone was 100%.After 3 ~ 18 month follow-up,the average PVR was reduced to (19.3 ± 1.6) ml,the average MRF was increased to (15.8 ± 3.2) ml/s,the average QOL was reduced to (2.0 ± 0.3) points,and the average IPSS was reduced to (8.0 ± 1.2) points,all with statistically significant difference compared with those before treatment (P < 0.05).Conclusion:TURP combined with holmium laser lithotripsy is of remarkable effect in treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia complicated with bladder stones,which is worthy to be popularized in clinical application.
    • 张朝晖
    • 摘要: 目的 探究微创手术治疗前列腺增生(BPH)合并输尿管结石(UC)的临床效果.方法 选取周口市中医院2014年8月至2016年9月收治的46例前列腺增生合并输尿管中下段结石患者,随机数表法分组,各23例.观察组同期实施输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术+经尿道前列腺电气化切除术(TUVP)治疗.对照组患者一期行输尿管镜下钬激光碎石术治疗,术后依据患者耐受情况二期行TUVP治疗.比较两组手术情况以及治疗前、治疗后3月国际前列腺症状评分量表(IPSS)评分、生活质量指数评分表(QOL)评分、残余尿量(RU)、最大尿流率(MFR)变化;统计术后7 d两组并发症发生情况.结果 观察组术中失血量、手术时间、住院时间明显优于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);观察组并发症发生率为30.43%,与对照组21.74%比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).结论 同期微创手术治疗前列腺增生合并输尿管中下段结石临床效果显著,可减少患者术中失血量,并缩短手术时间及住院时间,具有较高的安全性.
    • 王天培
    • 摘要: 目的:实验分析经尿道等离子体切除前列腺技术(TUPKVP)对良性前列腺增生治疗的临床有效性及临床可靠性。方法选取98例患有良性前列腺增生患者,将其随机分为两组,每组各49例,一组进行经尿道等离子体切除前列腺技术(TUPKVP)治疗称治疗组,另一组进行经尿道前列腺电切术治疗称观察组,两组患者的年龄、病史、病种等资料均无明显差异(P>0.05),两组患者实验所得资料具有可比性。治疗组采用经尿道等离子双极气化电切术切除前列腺,而观察组采用单级电切术切除前列腺。结果观察两组患者治疗后的效果,运用经尿道等离子体切除前列腺技术(TUPKVP)进行治疗的患者,①手术时间(9.54±2.52)h小于观察组(11.96±2.73)h;②手术出血量(13.44±3.35)mL小于观察组(20.96±4.10)mL;③住院天数(6.1±2.5)d小于观察组(9.6±2.7)d,且无患者水中毒导致尿失禁的情况发生,治疗效果较好,相对安全可靠,术后痊愈率高。结论实验结果表明,经尿道等离子体切除前列腺技术(TUPKVP)与经尿道前列腺电切术相比较,更为先进,高效,疗效更好,是值得临床推广的一种治疗方法。
    • 吴毅
    • 摘要: 目的:探讨经尿道前列腺汽化电切术治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)的疗效。方法回顾性分析 TUVP 联合 TURP 治疗前列腺增生症49例的临床资料。结果术后排尿功能恢复良好,术后5~26个月时随访,国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)平均8.3分,最大尿流率(MFR)平均18.0ml /s,49例 B 超剩余尿量平均为15ml。术中发生电切综合征1例,输血1例。膀胱颈后尿道狭窄1例,术后假性尿失禁1例。结论联合应用 TUVP 和 TURP 治疗前列腺增生症具有效果好、安全性高及并发症少等优点,值得临床推广应用。
  • 查看更多

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号