首页> 外文OA文献 >Michel Foucault and Judith Butler : troubling Butler's appropriation of Foucault's work
【2h】

Michel Foucault and Judith Butler : troubling Butler's appropriation of Foucault's work

机译:米歇尔·福柯和朱迪思·巴特勒:令人不安的巴特勒对福柯工作的挪用

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

One of the main influences on Judith Butler‘s thinking has been the work of Michel Foucault. Although this relationship is often commented on, it is rarely discussed in any detail. My thesis makes a contribution in this area. It presents an analysis of Foucault‘s work with the aim of countering Butler‘s representation of his thinking. In the first part of the thesis, I show how Butler initially interprets Foucault‘s project through Nietzschean genealogy, psychoanalysis and Derridean discourse, and how she later develops this interpretation in line with the progress of her own project. In the main part of the thesis, I present an analysis of Foucault‘s thinking in the period from The Archaeology of Knowledge (1969) to The History of Sexuality volume 1 (1976). This analysis focuses on the aspect of his work which has most influenced Butler‘s thinking: namely the notion of a relationship between knowledge, discourse and power. The other issues in his work which Butler addresses—genealogy, the subject, the body, abnormality, and sexuality—are discussed within this framework. I show how, in the early 1970s, Foucault develops the notion of power-knowledge, and sets out a relationship between power-knowledge and discourse which is overlooked by Butler. I argue that Butler interprets Foucaultian power through the notions of repression and social norms, and ignores the concepts of technology and strategy which form a key part of Foucault‘s thinking. I show how, from The Archaeology of Knowledge on, Foucault develops a socio-historical ontology and a genealogy of the subject, both of which are at variance with Butler‘s interpretation of his thinking.
机译:米歇尔·福柯的著作对朱迪思·巴特勒的思想产生了重大影响。尽管这种关系经常被评论,但很少详细讨论。我的论文在这方面做出了贡献。它对福柯的工作进行了分析,目的是反对巴特勒对他的思想的表示。在论文的第一部分,我将展示巴特勒最初是如何通过尼采家谱,心理分析和德里德里安的话语来解释福柯的项目的,以及她后来如何根据自己项目的进展来发展这种解释。在论文的主要部分,我对福柯的思想进行了分析,从《知识考古》(1969年)到《性历史》第1卷(1976年)。这种分析集中在影响巴特勒思想的工作方面:即知识,话语和权力之间关系的概念。巴特勒在工作中要解决的其他问题-家谱,主题,身体,异常和性行为-在此框架内进行讨论。我展示了1970年代初期,福柯如何发展权力知识的概念,并提出了权力知识与话语之间的关系,而巴特勒却忽略了这种关系。我认为巴特勒通过镇压和社会规范的概念来解释福柯的权力,而忽略了构成福柯思想的关键部分的技术和战略概念。我将展示从《知识考古》开始,福柯如何发展这一主题的社会历史本体论和家谱学,两者都与巴特勒对他的思想的解释背道而驰。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ennis Kathleen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号