首页> 外文学位 >Poststructural subjects and feminist concerns: An examination of identity, agency and politics in the works of Foucault, Butler and Kristeva (Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Julia Kristeva).
【24h】

Poststructural subjects and feminist concerns: An examination of identity, agency and politics in the works of Foucault, Butler and Kristeva (Michel Foucault, Judith Butler, Julia Kristeva).

机译:后结构主题和女权主义者的关注:对福柯,巴特勒和克里斯蒂娃(米歇尔·福柯,朱迪思·巴特勒,朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃)作品中的身份,代理和政治的考察。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I address the question of whether poststructuralist theories of subjectivity can accommodate emancipatory politics. I examine the models of subjectivity offered by Michel Foucault, Judith Butler and Julia Kristeva, and I evaluate these models in terms of their ability to provide an ethical and political framework that does not perpetuate oppression, and in particular that should be adopted by feminists. In chapter 1, I argue that Foucault reduces the subject to a placeholder within a discursive system and forecloses the possibility of meaningful agency and emancipatory politics. Because nothing escapes the discursive system, Foucault eliminates the subject's capacity for critical reflection, agency and intervention on the systems of oppression. Given Foucault's description of power and of subjugated knowledge, the only promise that Foucault holds is for total contestation and constant transgression. I examine the utility of Foucault's work for feminist politics and conclude that a better alternative should be sought. In chapter 2, I examine the utility of Foucault's work for feminist politics, and offer a critique of some feminist appropriations of Foucault. In chapter 3, I examine Judith Butler's theory of subjectivity. I argue that, like Foucault, Butler reduces subjects to placeholders within an inherently oppressive system and forecloses the possibility of a subject's capacity for critical reflection on that system. Throughout this chapter I address problems for feminist politics. Chapter 4 is a critique of attempts to find a meaningful account of agency in Butler's work by recasting her as an existentialist. In chapter 5, I turn to Kristeva's theory of signification and subjectivity. I argue that Kristeva does not reduce the subject to the discursive system, and that her theory allows for meaningful agency. I argue that Kristeva's theory can be used to diagnose social oppression. I show how Kristeva's theory can be used to diagnose fascist movements and sexism. I argue that her theory holds promise for a remedy to oppression.
机译:我要解决的问题是后结构主义的主体性理论是否可以容纳解放政治。我研究了米歇尔·福柯(Michel Foucault),朱迪思·巴特勒(Judith Butler)和朱莉娅·克里斯蒂娃(Julia Kristeva)提供的主观性模型,并根据它们提供的道德和政治框架不会永久压迫,尤其是女权主义者应该采用的能力评估这些模型。在第一章中,我认为福柯将主题简化为话语系统中的占位符,并排除了有意义的代理和解放政治的可能性。因为话语体系中没有任何东西可以逃脱,所以福柯消除了主体对压迫系统进行批判性反思,代理和干预的能力。鉴于福柯对权力和被屈服的知识的描述,福柯所拥有的唯一诺言是完全竞争和不断的犯罪。我研究了福柯的著作对女权政治的效用,并得出结论,应该寻求更好的选择。在第二章中,我研究了福柯的著作对女权政治的效用,并对福柯的某些女权主义拨款提出了批评。在第三章中,我研究了朱迪思·巴特勒的主体性理论。我认为,就像福柯一样,巴特勒在固有的压迫性系统中将主题简化为占位符,并排除了主题在该系统上进行批判性思考的能力。在本章中,我将讨论女权政治的问题。第四章对试图通过改写巴特勒为一个存在主义主义者来寻找有意义的代理人的行为进行了评论。在第5章中,我将讨论克里斯蒂娃的意义和主观性理论。我认为克里斯蒂娃并没有将主题归结于话语系统,并且她的理论允许有意义的代理。我认为克里斯蒂娃的理论可以用来诊断社会压迫。我将展示克里斯蒂娃的理论如何用于诊断法西斯主义运动和性别歧视。我认为她的理论对补救压迫有希望。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cooklin, Katherine Lowery.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Texas at Austin.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Texas at Austin.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Womens Studies.; Political Science General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2004
  • 页码 378 p.
  • 总页数 378
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;社会学;政治理论;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:43:58

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号