首页> 外文OA文献 >What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review
【2h】

What fosters or prevents interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care? A literature review

机译:是什么促进或阻止了小学和社区护理中的跨专业团队合作?文献综述

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: The increase in prevalence of long-term conditions in Western societies, with the subsequent need for non-acute quality patient healthcare, has brought the issue of collaboration between health professionals to the fore. Within primary care, it has been suggested that multidisciplinary teamworking is essential to develop an integrated approach to promoting and maintaining the health of the population whilst improving service effectiveness. Although it is becoming widely accepted that no single discipline can provide complete care for patients with a long-term condition, in practice, interprofessional working is not always achieved. Objectives: This review aimed to explore the factors that inhibit or facilitate interprofessional teamworking in primary and community care settings, in order to inform development of multidisciplinary working at the turn of the century. Design: A comprehensive search of the literature was undertaken using a variety of approaches to identify appropriate literature for inclusion in the study. The selected articles used both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Findings: Following a thematic analysis of the literature, two main themes emerged that had an impact on interprofessional teamworking: team structure and team processes. Within these two themes, six categories were identified: team premises; team size and composition; organisational support; team meetings; clear goals and objectives; and audit. The complex nature of interprofessional teamworking in primary care meant that despite teamwork being an efficient and productive way of achieving goals and results, several barriers exist that hinder its potential from becoming fully exploited; implications and recommendations for practice are discussed. Conclusions: These findings can inform development of current best practice, although further research needs to be conducted into multidisciplinary teamworking at both the team and organisation level, to ensure that enhancement and maintenance of teamwork leads to an improved quality of healthcare provision. © 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
机译:背景:西方社会长期病患率的上升,以及随后对非急性质量病人医疗服务的需求,使卫生专业人员之间的合作问题成为人们关注的焦点。在初级保健中,已经提出了多学科团队合作对于开发一种综合方法以促进和维持人口健康同时提高服务效率至关重要。尽管没有一个学科能够为长期病情的患者提供完整的护理,这一点已被广泛接受,但实际上,并非总是能完成跨专业的工作。目标:这篇综述旨在探讨在初级保健和社区护理环境中抑制或促进跨专业团队合作的因素,以便为世纪之交的多学科工作的发展提供信息。设计:使用多种方法对文献进行全面搜索,以确定合适的文献纳入研究。所选文章同时使用了定性和定量研究方法。发现:在对文献进行主题分析之后,出现了两个对跨专业团队合作产生影响的主题:团队结构和团队流程。在这两个主题中,确定了六个类别:团队场所;团队规模和组成;组织支持;团队会议;明确的目标;和审核。初级保健中跨专业团队合作的复杂性质意味着,尽管团队合作是实现目标和结果的有效方式,但仍然存在一些障碍,阻碍了其潜力的充分利用。讨论了对实践的启示和建议。结论:这些发现可以为当前最佳实践的发展提供信息,尽管需要在团队和组织层面对多学科团队合作进行进一步的研究,以确保增强和维护团队合作可以提高医疗保健质量。 ©2007 ElsevierLtd。保留所有权利。

著录项

  • 作者

    Xyrichis Andreas; Lowton Karen;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2008
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 {"code":"en","name":"English","id":9}
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号