首页> 外文OA文献 >Aerodynamic designing and position optimization of roof box
【2h】

Aerodynamic designing and position optimization of roof box

机译:车顶箱的空气动力学设计和位置优化

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This project examines the influence of aerodynamic factors of newly designed roof box at various positions over different car geometries. A baseline design of roof box was created and tested using MIRA reference cars in three different configurations at various positions to understand the behavior of the flow. A scaled design of roof box was also considered to understand the trends at various positions. Further investigation was conducted by varying the shape of the box. There was a lack of information in the literature on this subject. The existing data was insufficient to predict the optimum position of a roof box on a vehicle to reduce aerodynamic drag force.This project includes the analysis of a baseline design of roof box and its design variation which was inspired from Thule Motion 800 using CATIA V5 R20. It also includes the analysis at various positions in three perpendicular directions over MIRA vehicles. The key factor analyzed throughout the project was drag coefficient. In parallel, moment coefficients and flow behavior around the car and box were also evaluated.The numerical investigation of flow around MIRA cars and roof box were carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamics toolbox - Star-CCM+ V8.04. Due to the large number of experiments required to understand the influence of the position variation of roof box, Design of Experiments (DOE) using Taguchi method and general full factorial method in MINITAB were employed. Using Taguchi method, two-thirds of the simulations can be reduced.Out of the three geometric shape vehicles tested, the roof box has the highest influence on fastback car and least effect on squareback car. The average variation of drag due to roof box on squareback and fastback cars were 3% and 30% respectively. It was observed that there was a difference of 20% drag between the lowest and highest drag obtained with fastback car and that of squareback car was 5%. Nearly 6kW excess engine power was required to pull the fastback car along with fully loaded roof box. Due to the variation in design of roof box, 6% drag reduction was obtained on fastback car. Even if the individual drag due to roof box was higher, the overall drag remains less due to the interaction of flow between car and roof box. The results from various positions of roof box were compared using both methods in MINITAB. The result shows that Taguchi method was suitable to reduce the number of simulations in external aerodynamics.
机译:该项目研究了新设计的车顶箱在不同位置对不同几何形状的空气动力因素的影响。创建了车顶箱的基线设计,并使用MIRA参考车在不同位置的三种不同配置下对其进行了测试,以了解流的行为。还考虑了比例缩放的车顶箱设计,以了解各个位置的趋势。通过改变盒子的形状进行进一步的研究。文献中缺乏有关该主题的信息。现有数据不足以预测车顶盒在车辆上的最佳位置以减少空气阻力,该项目包括对车顶盒基线设计及其设计变化的分析,该设计灵感来自Thule Motion 800使用CATIA V5 R20 。它还包括MIRA车辆在三个垂直方向上各个位置的分析。在整个项目中分析的关键因素是阻力系数。同时,还评估了车厢和车厢周围的力矩系数和流动特性。使用计算流体动力学工具箱Star-CCM + V8.04对MIRA车厢和车顶箱周围的流动进行了数值研究。由于需要大量的实验来了解车顶箱位置变化的影响,因此在MINITAB中采用了Taguchi方法和通用全因子方法进行实验设计(DOE)。使用田口方法,可以减少三分之二的模拟量。在测试的三种几何形状的车辆中,车顶箱对快背车的影响最大,对方背车的影响最小。方盖车和快背车上的车顶箱造成的平均阻力变化分别为3%和30%。观察到,快背车的最低阻力和最高阻力之间的阻力相差20%,而方背车的阻力相差5%。要拉快退车和满载的车顶箱,需要将近6kW的发动机额外功率。由于车顶箱设计的变化,快背车的阻力降低了6%。即使由于车顶箱引起的单个阻力较高,由于汽车和车顶箱之间的相互作用,总阻力仍然较小。使用MINITAB中的两种方法比较了车顶箱各个位置的结果。结果表明,Taguchi方法适合减少外部空气动力学的仿真次数。

著录项

  • 作者

    George B.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2014
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 English
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号