首页> 外文OA文献 >Comparison Of Capillary Electrophoresis And High Performance Liquid Chromatography Methods For Caffeine Determination In Decaffeinated Coffee [comparação De Métodos Por Eletroforese Capilar E Cromatografia Líquida De Alta Eficiência Para A Determinação De Cafeína Em Café Descafeinado]
【2h】

Comparison Of Capillary Electrophoresis And High Performance Liquid Chromatography Methods For Caffeine Determination In Decaffeinated Coffee [comparação De Métodos Por Eletroforese Capilar E Cromatografia Líquida De Alta Eficiência Para A Determinação De Cafeína Em Café Descafeinado]

机译:毛细管电泳与高效液相色谱法测定脱咖啡因咖啡中咖啡因的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Decaffeinated coffee accounts for 10 percent of coffee sales in the world; it is preferred by consumers that do not wish or are sensitive to caffeine effects. This article presents an analytical comparison of capillary electrophoresis (CE) and high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods for residual caffeine quantification in decaffeinated coffee in terms of validation parameters, costs, analysis time, composition and treatment of the residues generated, and caffeine quantification in 20 commercial samples. Both methods showed suitable validation parameters. Caffeine content did not differ statistically in the two different methods of analysis. The main advantage of the high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was the 42-fold lower detection limit. Nevertheless, the capillary electrophoresis (CE) detection limit was 115-fold lower than the allowable limit by the Brazilian law. The capillary electrophoresis (CE) analyses were 30% faster, the reagent costs were 76.5-fold, and the volume of the residues generated was 33-fold lower. Therefore, the capillary electrophoresis (CE) method proved to be a valuable analytical tool for this type of analysis.
机译:不含咖啡因的咖啡占世界咖啡销售量的10%;不希望或对咖啡因效果敏感的消费者首选。本文介绍了在验证参数,成本,分析时间,产生的残留物的组成和处理以及咖啡因定量方面,毛细管电泳(CE)和高效液相色谱(HPLC)方法对无咖啡因咖啡中残留咖啡因定量的分析比较。在20个商业样本中。两种方法均显示出合适的验证参数。在两种不同的分析方法中,咖啡因含量在统计学上没有差异。高效液相色谱(HPLC)方法的主要优点是检出限降低了42倍。但是,毛细管电泳(CE)的检测限比巴西法律所允许的限低115倍。毛细管电泳(CE)分析速度提高了30%,试剂成本降低了76.5倍,残留物的体积降低了33倍。因此,毛细管电泳(CE)方法被证明是这种分析的一种有价值的分析工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号