首页> 外文OA文献 >Processes of participation in decision-making: Self-efficacy and performance-outcome instrumentalities as mediating variables in three levels of employee participation.
【2h】

Processes of participation in decision-making: Self-efficacy and performance-outcome instrumentalities as mediating variables in three levels of employee participation.

机译:参与决策的过程:自我效能感和绩效指标工具是员工参与三个层次的中介变量。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The potential of two variables, performance-outcome instrumentalities and self-efficacy, to mediate the relationships between employeesu27 participation in decision making (PDM) and the outcomes of PDM, job satisfaction and work performance, were investigated within the framework of Dachler and Wilpertu27s (1978) conceptual model of participation. Sixty-two direct-care workers on eight residences in a large Provincial residential facility for developmentally delayed persons completed the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire (Weiss, Dawis, England u26 Lofquist, 1967), two scales constructed for the present research to measure instrumentalities and self-efficacy, the Work Locus of Control Scale (Spector, 1988), and a perceived skill-utilization scale (Dowling u26 Ou27Brien, 1980). Residence supervisors rated the work performance of residential workers who participated in the research. Two weeks later semi-structured interviews and a perceived group influence scale (adapted from Moch, Cammann, u26 Cooke, 1983) were administered to subjects in order to classify the eight residential work groups according to the level of PDM used in their routine decision making procedures. Two residences (n = 15) that had been involved in a participation intervention two years prior to the present research were classified as Formal Participation residences. Three residences (n = 25) were classified as Informal Participation residences and the remaining three residences (n = 22) were classified as Non Participation. Results provided qualified support for positive relationships between PDM and both employeesu27 intrinsic job satisfaction and work performance. No support was found for the potential of instrumentalities to mediate the relationship between PDM and intrinsic job satisfaction, or for employeesu27 self-efficacy beliefs about performing their work to mediate the relationship between PDM and work performance. Ancillary analyses showed statistically significant correlations between intrinsic job satisfaction and both perceived group influence, and skill-utilization. These findings are discussed within the context of Dachler and Wilpertu27s (1978) convergent conceptual model of participation.Dept. of Psychology. Paper copy at Leddy Library: Theses u26 Major Papers - Basement, West Bldg. / Call Number: Thesis1991 .C458. Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 53-09, Section: B, page: 4988. Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Windsor (Canada), 1991.
机译:在Dachler和Dachler的框架下,研究了绩效变量工具和自我效能这两个变量在调解员工参与决策(PDM)与PDM的结果,工作满意度和工作绩效之间的关系的潜力。 Wilpert u27s(1978)参与的概念模型。在明尼苏达州满意度调查表(Weiss,Dawis,England u26 Lofquist,1967)上,在一个大型省级居民设施中的八个住所中的62个直接护理工人完成了对明尼苏达州满意度问卷的调查。效能,控制的工作场所量表(Spector,1988)和感知的技能利用量表(Dowling,1980)。住宅主管对参加研究的住宅工人的工作绩效进行了评估。两周后,对受试者进行了半结构化访谈和一个可感知的群体影响力量表(根据Moch,Cammann,1983年的修订),对受试者进行了分类,以便根据他们日常决策中使用的PDM等级对八个住宅工作组进行分类。制作程序。在本研究之前两年参与参与干预的两个住所(n = 15)被分类为正式参与住所。三个住所(n = 25)被归为非正式参与住所,其余三个住所(n = 22)被归类为不参与。结果为PDM与两名员工的内在工作满意度和工作绩效之间的积极关系提供了合格的支持。没有发现支持工具来调解PDM与内在工作满意度之间关系的潜力,也没有支持员工关于执行其工作来调解PDM与工作绩效之间关系的自我效能信念。辅助分析表明,内在的工作满意度与感知的群体影响力和技能利用之间在统计学上具有显着的相关性。这些发现在Dachler和Wilpert u27s(1978)的融合参与概念模型的背景下进行了讨论。心理学。莱迪图书馆的纸质副本:论文主要论文-西楼地下室。 /电话号码:Thesis1991 .C458。资料来源:国际学位论文摘要,第53-09卷,第B部分,第4988页。论文(博士学位)-温莎大学(加拿大),1991年。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cheston James E.;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 1991
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号