首页> 外文OA文献 >The impact of teaching an inquiry-based scheme of work on pupils’ attainment and critical thinking skills; and on the pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based teaching in science.
【2h】

The impact of teaching an inquiry-based scheme of work on pupils’ attainment and critical thinking skills; and on the pupils’ and teachers’ perceptions of inquiry-based teaching in science.

机译:教授基于探究性的工作计划对学生的学业和批判性思维能力的影响;以及学生和老师对探究式科学教学的看法。

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

This research was conducted to test the researcher’s view that when pupils learn science through inquiry-based teaching strategies, they improve their understanding of the subject and develop critical thinking skills. Although there is much research into inquiry-based teaching and learning, definitions are varied, and as such this research developed its own on which to base the intervention. Research into critical thinking skills focuses on older adolescents and young people, and therefore assessing 12-13 year olds, as in this research, is infrequent.udQuantitative and qualitative data was collected using a quasi-experimental format. Data for pupils’ attainment and critical thinking scores were collected both pre- and post-intervention, and this was analysed alongside perceptions of inquiry-based teaching stated in pupil and teacher focus groups.udThe intervention was a three-topic scheme of work taught to half of the cohort with the other half being taught the same content but using their teachers’ normal approach. The intervention was written by the researcher and was based on research into the strategies termed inquiry-based following the literature review.udIt was found that there were no gains in attainment for pupils being taught using the intervention rather than the normal style of teaching compared to the control group. Gains in critical thinking were found in the treatment group but were not significant, and therefore, it was concluded the inquiry-based teaching did not have a positive effect on either pupils’ understanding of science or their critical thinking skills.udPupils’ perceptions highlighted that they did not enjoy the group work, open-ended nature of inquiry-based learning, and missed the structure of creating a set of notes. Teachers believed that pupils’ critical thinking skills would improve using inquiry-based techniques, but that pupils required more training in the skills needed to make this type of learning successful for this to take place.ud
机译:进行这项研究是为了检验研究人员的观点,即当学生通过基于探究的教学策略来学习科学时,他们会提高对主题的理解并发展批判性思维能力。尽管对基于探究的教与学进行了大量研究,但定义却有所不同,因此,本研究在干预的基础上发展了自己的研究。批判性思维技能的研究主要集中于青少年和年轻人,因此,像本研究一样,很少评估12-13岁的青少年。 ud使用准实验格式收集定量和定性数据。在干预前后,均收集了学生的学业成绩和批判性思维得分的数据,并与学生和教师焦点小组中陈述的基于探究性教学的看法进行了分析。 ud干预是一个三主题的教学计划一半的学生,而另一半则使用老师的常规方法教相同的内容。这项干预措施是由研究人员撰写的,是基于对文献回顾后基于探究策略的研究的结果。 ud发现,采用干预措施而不是正常的教学方式对学生的学习成绩没有任何提高。到对照组。在治疗组中发现了批判性思维的收获,但没有显着意义,因此,得出结论,基于探究的教学对学生对科学的理解或他们的批判性思维技能没有积极的影响。 udPupils的感知突出显示他们不喜欢团队合作,探究式学习的开放式性质,并且错过了创建笔记的结构。教师相信,使用基于探究的技术,学生的批判性思维能力将得到提高,但是学生需要进行更多的技能培训,以使这种学习成功进行。 ud

著录项

  • 作者

    Atkinson Emma Jane;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号