首页> 外文OA文献 >Joint Green Marketing Decision-Making of Green Supply Chain Considering Power Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility
【2h】

Joint Green Marketing Decision-Making of Green Supply Chain Considering Power Structure and Corporate Social Responsibility

机译:考虑电力结构和企业社会责任的绿色供应链联合绿色营销决策

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

In order to explore the impact of a manufacturer’s or retailer’s undertaking corporate social responsibility (CSR) and different power structures on their joint green marketing decisions and profits in the green supply chain, this paper establishes green supply chain optimization models under six different decision-making scenarios according to two different CSR bearers and three different power structures. Based on the main assumptions of a linear product demand function and CSR measured by consumer surplus, this paper solves the equilibrium solutions of the manufacturer and the retailer through game theory. The results show that: First, the difference in the degree of CSR undertaken by manufacturers and retailers leads to a difference in the ranking of optimal strategies of both parties under the three power structures. Second, under the same power structure, compared with undertaking CSR by oneself, when the other party undertakes CSR, the level of the product’s green degree, the level of green promotion, the party’s own profit, and the profit of the other party are all higher. Third, regardless of the power structure, manufacturers and retailers undertaking CSR is conducive to improving the level of product greenness, increasing green promotion, lowering the retail price, increasing consumers’ willingness to buy green products, and ultimately helping to increase the profits of manufacturers and retailers.
机译:为了探讨制造商或零售商的企业社会责任(CSR)和不同电力结构对绿色供应链的联合绿色营销决策和利润的影响,本文在六种不同决策下建立了绿色供应链优化模型根据两种不同的CSR承载和三种不同的电源结构的情况。基于由消费者盈余测量的线性产品需求功能和CSR的主要假设,本文通过博弈论解决了制造商和零售商的均衡解决方案。结果表明:首先,制造商和零售商所采取的CSR程度的差异导致双方在三个电力结构下双方的最佳策略排名差异。二,在相同的电力结构下,与自己的企业社会责任相比,当另一方进行企业社会责任,产品绿色程度,绿色促销水平,党的自身利润,以及对方的利润都是全部更高。三,无论电力结构,制造商和零售商都有利于改善产品绿色水平,增加绿色促销,降低零售价,增加消费者购买绿色产品的意愿,最终有助于增加制造商的利润和零售商。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号