...
首页> 外文期刊>Pain. >Effects of intensity of electroacupuncture upon experimental pain in healthy human volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
【24h】

Effects of intensity of electroacupuncture upon experimental pain in healthy human volunteers: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

机译:电针强度对健康志愿者体内实验性疼痛的影响:一项随机,双盲,安慰剂对照的研究。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Electroacupuncture is commonly used for pain relief. Despite an extensive evidence-base guiding the selection of stimulation parameters, little methodologically robust research exists regarding the level of intensity required to provide effective doses. This study investigated the hypoalgesic effects of two stimulation intensities compared to placebo on pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) in pain-free humans. Forty-eight acupuncture-naive volunteers (mean age 23), stratified by gender, were screened for relevant contraindications and randomly allocated to four groups: control, placebo, high-intensity ("to tolerance but sub-noxious") or low-intensity ("strong but comfortable"). True or placebo electroacupuncture, using the Streitberger placebo needle, was administered to acupoints on dominant forearm (LI10, TH5) and ipsilateral leg (GB34, ST38). True needles (30 mm long, 0.3 mm diameter) were inserted 20-25 mm and "de-qi" was elicited from active groups, prior to administering 30 min of 4 Hz, 200 micros electroacupuncture. No electrical stimulation was performed on control and placebo groups, and placebo needles were used. After the intervention period, all needles were removed. Volunteers were monitored for 30 further minutes. Two PPT measurements were taken bilaterally from muscle bellies of first dorsal interosseous by an independent rater, at baseline and at six subsequent 10-min intervals. Square-root transformed data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA, with baseline data as covariate. The high-intensity group was significantly different from the placebo group for both measurement sites (p=.020, p=.033). The control group displayed stable PPT readings over time. No significant differences were observed between the placebo and control groups. These findings suggest that high-intensity levels may be important in optimal dose selection.
机译:电针通常用于缓解疼痛。尽管有大量的证据指导选择刺激参数,但在提供有效剂量所需的强度水平方面,尚缺乏方法论上可靠的研究。这项研究调查了两种刺激强度与安慰剂相比对无痛人的压力痛阈值(PPT)的镇痛作用。筛选了48位按性别分类的初次针灸志愿者(平均年龄23岁)相关禁忌症,并将其随机分为四组:对照组,安慰剂,高强度(“耐受但低毒”)或低强度(“强壮但舒适”)。使用Streitberger安慰剂针进行真针或安慰剂电针刺至优势前臂(LI10,TH5)和同侧腿(GB34,ST38)上的穴位。将真正的针头(长30毫米,直径0.3毫米)插入20-25毫米,并在进行30分钟的4 Hz,200微米电针刺之前,从活跃组中引出“ de-qi”。对照组和安慰剂组均未进行电刺激,使用了安慰剂针头。干预期过后,将所有针头拔出。进一步监测志愿者30分钟。在基线时以及在随后的六个10分钟间隔内,由独立评估者从第一背骨内侧的肌肉腹两侧进行两次PPT测量。使用重复测量方差分析对平方根转换后的数据进行分析,并将基线数据作为协变量。高强度组与安慰剂组在两个测量部位均存在显着差异(p = .020,p = .033)。对照组随时间显示稳定的PPT读数。安慰剂组和对照组之间未观察到显着差异。这些发现表明,高强度水平对于最佳剂量选择可能很重要。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号