首页> 外文期刊>Oncology: International Journal of Cancer Research and Treatment >Rechallenge with mTOR inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who progressed on previous mTOR inhibitor therapy
【24h】

Rechallenge with mTOR inhibitors in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients who progressed on previous mTOR inhibitor therapy

机译:在先前使用mTOR抑制剂治疗进展的转移性肾细胞癌患者中使用mTOR抑制剂的挑战

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective: To determine if mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor (everolimus or temsirolimus) rechallenge in the third- or fourth-line setting after sequential use of a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGF)-targeted agent and an mTOR inhibitor is a feasible and effective treatment strategy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Methods: Patients who received a VEGF-targeted agent, an mTOR inhibitor and rechallenge with a second mTOR inhibitor at 2 institutions (H?pital Européen Georges-Pompidou and Vienna Medical School) between 30 March 2001 and 15 September 2011 were included. Analyses of radiographic images were performed according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.0, to determine the objective response rate and treatment duration (TD). Results: Twelve patients met the inclusion criteria. Following 1 or 2 VEGF receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, 7 patients firstly received everolimus and 5 patients received temsirolimus. Irrespective of treatment sequence, 6 of 12 patients (50%) responded to everolimus and 4 of 12 patients (33%) responded to temsirolimus; 3 patients (25%) did not respond to either. Median TDs (95% confidence interval) for everolimus → temsirolimus and temsirolimus → everolimus sequences were 10.3 months (8.8-19.2 months) and 5.8 months (2.9-19.3 months), respectively. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of patients, this highlights the feasibility of utilizing mTOR rechallenge as an integral part of sequential treatment strategies in mRCC.
机译:目的:确定在顺序使用血管内皮生长因子受体(VEGF)靶向药物和mTOR抑制剂后,雷帕霉素(mTOR)抑制剂(依维莫司或temsirolimus)在三线或四线环境中的再攻击目标转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者的可行性和有效治疗策略。方法:包括2001年3月30日至2011年9月15日在两家机构(H?pitalEuropéenGeorges-Pompidou和Vienna医学院)接受VEGF靶向药物,mTOR抑制剂并接受第二种mTOR抑制剂挑战的患者。根据《 1.0版实体肿瘤反应评估标准》对放射线图像进行分析,以确定客观反应率和治疗持续时间(TD)。结果:12名患者符合纳入标准。在使用1或2种VEGF受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂后,首先有7例患者接受了依维莫司,有5例患者接受了西罗莫司。不论治疗顺序如何,12名患者中有6名(50%)对依维莫司有反应,12名患者中有4名(33%)对西罗莫司有反应; 3名患者(25%)均未反应。依维莫司→替莫罗莫司和替莫罗莫司→依维莫司序列的中位TDs(95%置信区间)分别为10.3个月(8.8-19.2个月)和5.8个月(2.9-19.3个月)。结论:尽管患者人数有限,但这突出了将mTOR再挑战作为mRCC序贯治疗策略不可或缺的一部分的可行性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号