首页> 外文期刊>Renal failure. >Assessment of protein nitrogen appearance in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients-which method to use?
【24h】

Assessment of protein nitrogen appearance in Chinese peritoneal dialysis patients-which method to use?

机译:评估中国腹膜透析患者蛋白质氮素的使用方法?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

OBJECTIVE: We compared the Bergstrom's and Randerson's formula for PNA determination, and compared the normalization of PNA by ideal body weight (IBW) and standard body weight (SBW) as estimated by the Watson's formula. METHODS. We studied 208 Chinese PD patients. Two 24-h dialysate and urine collections were performed six months apart. Protein nitrogen appearance was determined by the Randerson's formula (PNA-Rand) and Bergstrom's formula (PNA-Berg), the latter used as the gold standard. PNA-Berg was normalized with IBW and SBW, denoted as NPNA-IBW and NPNA-Watson respectively. The change of PNA over six months, denoted as APNA-Rand and APNA-Berg, were calculated. The results were compared by the Bland and Altman's method. RESULTS: At zero month, the average PNA-Berg was 61.8 +/- 14.8 g/day, and the average PNA-Rand was 58.1 +/- 14.5 g/day. The value of PNA-Rand was consistently lower than the corresponding PNA-Berg. The bias of PNA-Rand was -3.7g/day. The limits of agreement were -9.2 to +1.8 g/day. When NPNA-Watson was compared to NPNA-IBW, the bias of NPNA-Watson, using NPNA-IBW as gold standard, was 0.01 g/kg/day; the limits of agreement were -0.22 to +0.23 g/kg/day. The difference between NPNA-Watson and NPNA-IBW correlated with the body mass index (r = -0.820, p < 0.001) and body weight (r = -0.834, r < 0.001). After six month, there was a significant reduction in urine protein loss. However, total protein loss was only slightly reduced (7.3 +/- 3.0 to 6.9 +/- 2.8 g/day, p = 0.029). The correlation between APNA-Berg and APNA-Rand remained excellent (r = 0.983, p < 0.001). The bias of APNA-Rand was +0.3 g/day; the limits of agreement were -4.7 to +5.2 g/day. CONCLUSION: Ideal body weight that is validated for specific ethnic group, rather than the Watson's formula, should be used for normalization of PNA. Although the Randerson's formula under-estimates PNA when compared to the Bergstrom's formula, it is a reliable method for serial PNA monitoring because dialysate protein loss is stable in most patients.
机译:目的:我们比较了测定PNA的Bergstrom和Randerson公式,并比较了由Watson公式估算的理想体重(IBW)和标准体重(SBW)对PNA的归一化。方法。我们研究了208名中国PD患者。相隔六个月进行两次24小时透析液和尿液收集。蛋白质氮的外观由Randerson公式(PNA-Rand)和Bergstrom公式(PNA-Berg)确定,后者用作金标准。 PNA-Berg用IBW和SBW标准化,分别表示为NPNA-IBW和NPNA-Watson。计算了六个月内PNA的变化,分别表示为APNA-Rand和APNA-Berg。通过布兰德和奥特曼的方法比较结果。结果:在零个月时,平均PNA-Berg为61.8 +/- 14.8 g /天,平均PNA-Rand为58.1 +/- 14.5 g /天。 PNA-Rand的值始终低于相应的PNA-Berg。 PNA-Rand的偏差为-3.7g /天。同意量为-9.2至+1.8 g /天。当将NPNA-Watson与NPNA-IBW进行比较时,以NPNA-IBW为金标准的NPNA-Watson的偏差为0.01 g / kg /天;协议限制为-0.22至+0.23 g / kg /天。 NPNA-Watson和NPNA-IBW之间的差异与体重指数(r = -0.820,p <0.001)和体重(r = -0.834,r <0.001)相关。六个月后,尿蛋白损失明显减少。但是,总蛋白质损失仅略有减少(7.3 +/- 3.0至6.9 +/- 2.8 g /天,p = 0.029)。 APNA-Berg和APNA-Rand之间的相关性仍然很好(r = 0.983,p <0.001)。 APNA-Rand的偏差为+0.3 g /天;协议限制为-4.7至+5.2 g /天。结论:应该使用针对特定种族验证的理想体重,而不是沃森公式,来对PNA进行标准化。尽管与Bergstrom公式相比,Randerson公式低估了PNA,但由于大多数患者中的透析液蛋白损失稳定,因此它是连续PNA监测的可靠方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号