首页> 外文期刊>Medical teacher >Career-long learning: Relationship between cognitive and metacognitive skills
【24h】

Career-long learning: Relationship between cognitive and metacognitive skills

机译:长期学习:认知与元认知技能之间的关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Objectives: Physicians need metacognitive skills including reflection and goal generation for effective lifelong learning (LLL). These skills are not readily assessed and may not correlate with cognitive skills. We examined early-career physicians' metacognition and relationships between metacognitive skills, cognitive skills, and orientation toward LLL. Methods: Pediatric fellows at UCSF document career progress in annual Individual Development Plans (IDPs). To assess metacognitive skills, we scored narratives in IDPs with a Reflective Ability Rubric (RAR) and goal setting with a SMART Goal Rubric (SMART-GR: consists of global IDP score and four IDP domain subscores). To assess cognitive skills, we collected American Board of Pediatrics scores (ABP), and to measure orientation toward LLL, fellows completed the Jefferson Scale (JeffSPLL). We used Spearman's correlation to examine relationships between scores. Results: About 57/66 (86%) fellows participated. Mean scores were: RAR 2.4 ± 1.3 (scale 0-6); SMART-GR global IDP 2.8 ± 1.0, (1-5); JeffSPLL 46.3 ± 3.9 (14-56); and ABP 559.4 ± 75.7. RAR scores correlated significantly with SMART-GR scores but metacognitive measures did not correlate with ABP scores. Conclusions: Our study suggests early-career physicians may have limited metacognitive skills; cognitive and metacognitive skills do not correlate; and orientation toward LLL does not predict metacognitive skills. Thus, we need improved methods to teach and assess metacognition.
机译:目标:医师需要元认知技能,包括反思和目标生成,以实现有效的终身学习(LLL)。这些技能不容易评估,可能与认知技能不相关。我们研究了早期医师的元认知以及元认知技能,认知技能和对LLL的倾向之间的关系。方法:UCSF的儿科医师在年度个人发展计划(IDP)中记录职业生涯进展。为了评估元认知技能,我们对IDP的叙事进行了评分,并采用了反射能力专栏(RAR),并为目标设定了SMART目标专栏(SMART-GR:包括全球IDP分数和四个IDP域子分数)。为了评估认知技能,我们收集了美国儿科学会评分(ABP),并测量了对LLL的取向,研究人员完成了Jefferson量表(JeffSPLL)。我们使用Spearman的相关性检查分数之间的关系。结果:大约57/66(86%)个研究对象参加了该研究。平均得分为:RAR 2.4±1.3(等级0-6); SMART-GR全球IDP 2.8±1.0,(1-5); JeffSPLL 46.3±3.9(14-56);和ABP 559.4±75.7。 RAR评分与SMART-GR评分显着相关,但元认知指标与ABP评分不相关。结论:我们的研究表明,早期职业医师可能具有有限的元认知能力。认知和元认知技能不相关;面向LLL的方向不能预测元认知能力。因此,我们需要改进的方法来教授和评估元认知。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号