首页> 外文期刊>Educational and Psychological Measurement >The convergent validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories
【24h】

The convergent validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories

机译:创造性思维和创造性兴趣量表的测验收敛性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This study compared scores on two divergent thinking tests, the Verbal and the Figural Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT), with scores on two creativity interest inventories, Davis's How Do You Think? and Raudsepp's How Creative Are You? The creativity interest inventories showed weak correlations with the Verbal TTCT and no correlations with the Figural TTCT. The two interest inventories showed a strong intercorrelation, but the Verbal and Figural TTCTs were only moderately intercorrelated. These interrelationships were not substantially affected by controlling for standardized academic test scores. A principal components analysis of the subscale scores on the four tests resulted in three factors: Interests and Attitudes, Verbal Divergent Thinking, and Figural Divergent Thinking. These results provide evidence that creative interest inventories are not measuring the same construct as divergent thinking tests and that both are distinct from academic aptitude/achievement. They also support the contention that divergent thinking is multidimensional.
机译:这项研究比较了两个不同的思维测验的得分(创造性思维的口头和形象托伦斯测验(TTCT))与两个创新兴趣量表(戴维斯的《您如何看待》)的得分。和拉德塞普(Raudsepp)的《你有什么创造力?创造力兴趣量表与言语TTCT的相关性较弱,而与形象TTCT的相关性则不相关。两个兴趣量表显示出很强的相互关系,但是言语和人物形象TTCT的相关性都中等。控制标准学术考试成绩并没有实质性地影响这些相互关系。对这四个测试的分量表分数进行主成分分析,得出三个因素:兴趣和态度,言语发散思维和形象发散思维。这些结果提供了证据,表明创意兴趣量表的度量结构与发散性思维测验的度量值不同,并且两者均与学术才能/成就不同。他们还支持不同思维是多维的观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号