首页> 外文期刊>International Journal of Food Sciences and Nutrition >In vitro carbohydrate digestibility of whole-chickpea and chickpea bread products
【24h】

In vitro carbohydrate digestibility of whole-chickpea and chickpea bread products

机译:鹰嘴豆和鹰嘴豆面包产品的体外碳水化合物消化率

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Pulses such as the chickpea are generally considered to be valuable dietary sources of slowly digestible starch, a form of starch that is considered beneficial to health since it results in relatively low post-meal blood glucose levels compared with more rapidly digested starch. The development of novel chickpea-based foods is necessary to help expand the worldwide consumption of the chickpea. However, the effect of different processing methods on the starch digestibility of chickpea-based foods has not been widely investigated. This study used an in vitro method simulating human carbohydrate digestion to determine levels of slowly digestible starch, rapidly digestible starch (RDS), resistant starch, total starch and rapidly available glucose (RAG) of: (i) whole-chickpea products (domestically boiled, commercially canned and commercially precooked/vacuum-packaged); and (ii) standard white bread, chickpea flour bread (25% replacement of wheat flour by chickpea flour) and extruded chickpea flour bread (25% replacement of wheat flour by extruded chickpea flour). The RAG levels were then used to predict the relative in vivo glycaemic indices of the products. The commercially precooked/vacuum-packaged whole chickpeas demonstrated higher levels of RDS than the commercially canned and domestically boiled products (P<0.05). In addition, the domestically boiled product had lower levels of RAG (g/100 g available carbohydrate) compared with the canned and precooked/vacuum-packaged products (P??0.05) and all bread products demonstrated far higher RAG (g/100 g available carbohydrate) values than the whole-chickpea products. The findings suggest that the commercially precooked/vacuum-packaged whole chickpeas and the canned product may have higher and less beneficial glycaemic indices than the domestically boiled chickpeas. It appears unlikely that the use of chickpea flour or extruded chickpea flour, at the incorporation rate investigated in this study, would modify the glycaemic index of bread. It is probable, however, that the chickpea bread products investigated would demonstrate higher and potentially less beneficial glycaemic indices than the whole-chickpea products.
机译:通常认为豆类(如鹰嘴豆)是缓慢消化的淀粉的重要饮食来源,这种淀粉被认为对健康有益,因为与更快消化的淀粉相比,其餐后血糖水平相对较低。开发新型鹰嘴豆基食品对帮助扩大鹰嘴豆的全球消费量至关重要。但是,尚未广泛研究不同加工方法对鹰嘴豆类食品淀粉消化率的影响。这项研究使用了一种模拟人类碳水化合物消化的体外方法来确定以下各项的慢消化淀粉,快速消化淀粉(RDS),抗性淀粉,总淀粉和快速可用葡萄糖(RAG)的水平:(i)全鹰嘴豆产品(在国内煮熟) ,商业罐头和商业预煮/真空包装); (ii)标准白面包,鹰嘴豆粉面包(用鹰嘴豆粉替代小麦粉25%)和挤压鹰嘴豆粉面包(用挤压鹰嘴豆粉替代小麦粉25%)。然后将RAG水平用于预测产物的相对体内血糖指数。商业预煮/真空包装的完整鹰嘴豆的RDS水平高于商业罐头和家庭煮熟的产品(P <0.05)。另外,与罐装和预煮/真空包装的产品相比,国内煮制的产品具有较低水平的RAG(g / 100g可利用的碳水化合物)(P≤0.05)。白面包,鹰嘴豆粉面包和膨化鹰嘴豆粉面包的碳水化合物消化率指标之间均无显着差异(P≥0.05),并且所有面包产品的RAG(g / 100 g有效碳水化合物)值均远高于全鹰嘴豆制品。该发现表明,商业上预煮过的/真空包装的完整鹰嘴豆和罐头产品可能比国内煮熟的鹰嘴豆具有更高和更少的有益血糖指数。以鹰嘴豆粉或膨化鹰嘴豆粉的使用量,以本研究调查的掺入率,似乎不太可能改变面包的血糖指数。但是,所研究的鹰嘴豆面包产品可能显示出比全鹰嘴豆产品更高和更低的有益血糖指数。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号