首页> 外文期刊>The European journal of health economics: HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care >A method to simulate incentives for cost containment under various cost sharing designs: an application to a first-euro deductible and a doughnut hole
【24h】

A method to simulate incentives for cost containment under various cost sharing designs: an application to a first-euro deductible and a doughnut hole

机译:一种模拟各种成本分担设计中成本遏制的动作的方法:将第一欧元免赔额和甜甜圈洞的应用程序

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Abstract Many health insurance schemes include deductibles to provide consumers with cost containment incentives (CCI) and to counteract moral hazard. Policymakers are faced with choices on the implementation of a specific cost sharing design. One of the guiding principles in this decision process could be which design leads to the strongest CCI. Despite the vast amount of literature on the effects of cost sharing, the relative effects of specific cost sharing designs—e.g., a traditional deductible versus a doughnut hole—will mostly be absent for a certain context. This papers aims at developing a simulation model to approximate the relative effects of different deductible modalities on the CCI. We argue that the CCI depends on the probability that healthcare expenses end up in the deductible range and the expected healthcare expenses given that they end up in the deductible range. Our empirical application shows that different deductible modalities result in different CCIs and that the CCI under a certain modality differs across risk-groups.
机译:摘要许多健康保险计划包括推迟,为消费者提供成本遏制激励措施(CCI)并抵消道德风险。政策制定者面临着实施特定成本共享设计的选择。该决策过程中的指导原则之一可以是哪种设计导致最强的CCI。尽管成本分担的影响,但特定成本共享设计的相对效果 - 例如,传统的可扣除与甜甜圈孔 - 一定的背景。本文旨在开发模拟模型,以近似不同可扣除模型对CCI的相对影响。我们认为CCI取决于医疗费用最终在可扣除范围内的概率以及预期的医疗保健费用,因为它们最终可以在可扣除范围内。我们的实证应用表明,不同的可扣除模式导致不同的CCI,并且在某种方式下的CCI跨风险组不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号