首页> 美国卫生研究院文献>Springer Open Choice >A method to simulate incentives for cost containment under various cost sharing designs: an application to a first-euro deductible and a doughnut hole
【2h】

A method to simulate incentives for cost containment under various cost sharing designs: an application to a first-euro deductible and a doughnut hole

机译:一种模拟各种成本分担设计下的成本控制激励措施的方法:应用于第一欧元免赔额和甜甜圈洞

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Many health insurance schemes include deductibles to provide consumers with cost containment incentives (CCI) and to counteract moral hazard. Policymakers are faced with choices on the implementation of a specific cost sharing design. One of the guiding principles in this decision process could be which design leads to the strongest CCI. Despite the vast amount of literature on the effects of cost sharing, the relative effects of specific cost sharing designs—e.g., a traditional deductible versus a doughnut hole—will mostly be absent for a certain context. This papers aims at developing a simulation model to approximate the relative effects of different deductible modalities on the CCI. We argue that the CCI depends on the probability that healthcare expenses end up in the deductible range and the expected healthcare expenses given that they end up in the deductible range. Our empirical application shows that different deductible modalities result in different CCIs and that the CCI under a certain modality differs across risk-groups.
机译:许多健康保险计划都包括免赔额,以向消费者提供成本遏制激励措施(CCI)并消除道德风险。决策者在实施特定的成本分摊设计时面临选择。在此决策过程中的指导原则之一可能是设计导致最强的CCI。尽管有大量关于成本分摊效应的文献,但是在特定情况下,大多数情况下将不存在特定成本分摊设计的相对效应,例如,传统的免赔额与甜甜圈洞。本文旨在开发一种模拟模型,以近似估算不同免赔额方式对CCI的相对影响。我们认为,CCI取决于医疗保健费用最终在可抵扣范围内的可能性以及预期的医疗保健费用(假定它们在可扣除范围内)。我们的经验应用表明,不同的可抵扣方式导致了不同的CCI,并且在特定模式下的CCI在各个风险组之间也有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号