...
首页> 外文期刊>Journal of public economics >Cost-sharing design matters: A comparison of the rebate and deductible in healthcare
【24h】

Cost-sharing design matters: A comparison of the rebate and deductible in healthcare

机译:费用分摊设计很重要:医疗保健中的折扣和免赔额的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Since 2006, the Dutch population has faced two different cost-sharing schemes in health insurance for curative care: a mandatory rebate in 2006 and 2007, and a mandatory deductible since 2008. With administrative data for the entire Dutch population and using a difference-in-differences design, we compare the effect of these schemes on healthcare consumption. We draw upon a regression discontinuity design to extrapolate effects to the cut-off age 18 and incorporate the size of the cost-sharing scheme. Our estimate shows that for individuals around the age of eighteen, one euro of the deductible reduces healthcare expenditures 18 eurocents more than one euro of the rebate. This demonstrates that different designs of a cost-sharing scheme can have substantially different effects on total healthcare expenditure. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
机译:自2006年以来,荷兰人在医疗保险的医疗保健方面面临两种不同的费用分摊方案:2006年和2007年的强制性退税,以及自2008年以来的强制性自付额。利用整个荷兰人口的行政数据并使用差额-差异设计,我们比较了这些计划对医疗保健消费的影响。我们利用回归不连续性设计将影响推断到18岁的截止年龄,并纳入成本分摊方案的规模。我们的估计显示,对于18岁左右的个人,自付额中的1欧元会减少18欧分的医疗支出,而不是1欧元的退税。这表明,费用分摊方案的不同设计可能对医疗保健总支出产生实质上不同的影响。 (C)2019 Elsevier B.V.保留所有权利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号