首页> 外文期刊>Nurse education in practice >Simulation as an educational tool in acute nursing care: A controlled intervention study
【24h】

Simulation as an educational tool in acute nursing care: A controlled intervention study

机译:作为急性护理护理中的教育工具的模拟:受控干预研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Simulations have become a common educational tool among nursing students; however, the impact of clinical simulations as tested using an experimental design is not yet well established. In a controlled intervention study, nursing students received either traditional classroom lessons (C) or traditional classroom lessons combined with simulation-based lessons at the hospital (I). The primary outcome variable was the basic knowledge of acute nursing measured by a multiple-choice questionnaire. Secondary outcome variables were grade point average, the students' perception of the learning process, and self-efficacy. Seventy-four students participated in the study; C:n = 36 and I:n = 38. Regarding basic knowledge, there was no significant difference between the groups (I:11.8 +/- 0.4, C:12.1 +/- 0.4, p = 0.54). The I-group had a more positive perception of the learning process (Delta:6.0 +/- 1.1,p 0.002) and rated their self-efficacy higher (Delta:8.5 2.3,p 0.002). The students reported higher levels of self-efficacy, when combining the traditional lessons and simulation-based lessons. When combining the two approaches, their fundamental knowledge is not improved.
机译:仿真已成为护理学生中的一个共同的教育工具;然而,使用实验设计测试的临床模拟的影响尚未确定。在受控干预研究中,护理学生接受了传统课堂课程(C)或传统课堂课程,与医院(I)的仿真课程相结合。主要结果变量是通过多项选择问卷测量的急性护理的基本知识。次要结果变量是等级点平均值,学生对学习过程的看法,以及自我效能。七十四名学生参加了这项研究; C:n = 36和i:n = 38.关于基本知识,组之间没有显着差异(i:11.8 +/- 0.4,c:12.1 +/- 0.4,p = 0.54)。 I-Group对学习过程(Delta:6.0 +/- 1.1,P <0.002)进行了更积极的看法,并评定了它们的自效高(Delta:8.5 2.3,P <0.002)。当与基于传统课程和模拟的课程相结合时,学生报告了更高水平的自我效能。结合两种方法时,他们的基本知识并不改善。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号